throbber
Kurcz, Jennifer
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`
`
`Adam Kessel <Kessel@fr.com>
`Monday, August 01, 2016 1:46 PM
`Kurcz, Jennifer
`Healey, David J.; nmorgan@wsgr.com; Levin, Michael; Bailey Harris
`RE: TTI v. TS/IBG - Protective Order Issue re CBM
`
`Hi Jen: 

`Defendants do not object to discussing the documents at a high level on the telephone 
`conference. We do not believe specific details are necessary for the discussion; however, if 
`specifics are disclosed, we would simply request that the transcript be filed under the PTAB 
`protective order. 

`Regards, 

`Adam 

`From: Kurcz, Jennifer [mailto:kurcz@mbhb.com]  
`Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 12:24 PM 
`To: Adam Kessel <Kessel@fr.com> 
`Cc: David Healey <Healey@fr.com>; nmorgan@wsgr.com; Michael Levin <mlevin@wsgr.com>; Bailey Harris 
`<bharris@fr.com> 
`Subject: RE: TTI v. TS/IBG ‐ Protective Order Issue re CBM 
`
`Adam,
`
`Thank you for your response.
`
` I
`
` also assume that TS and IB do not object to TT discussing with the Board some of the documents/information
`on the telephone conference in which we seek leave to file our motion?
`
`Thanks,
`Jen
`
`From: Adam Kessel [mailto:Kessel@fr.com]
`Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 5:51 PM
`To: Kurcz, Jennifer
`Cc: Healey, David J.; nmorgan@wsgr.com; Levin, Michael; Bailey Harris
`Subject: RE: TTI v. TS/IBG - Protective Order Issue re CBM
`
`
`
`Hi Jen: 
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2403
`IBG ET AL. v. TRADING TECH
`CBM2015-00181
`
`

`


`We understand that TT must first seek leave from the Board to file a motion to file 
`supplemental information. If the PTAB permits TT to file a motion to file supplemental 
`information, TradeStation and IBG will not object on the basis of the district court protective 
`order. Likewise, if PTAB’s motion to file supplemental information is itself granted, 
`TradeStation and IBG will not object to the actual filing on the basis of the district court 
`protective order. All of this is subject, of course, to any TradeStation/IBG documents or 
`deposition testimony being filed under the PTAB Protective Order. I believe this answers your 
`inquiry but please advise if there remains any ambiguity. 

`Regards, 

`Adam 

`From: Kurcz, Jennifer [mailto:kurcz@mbhb.com]  
`Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 5:34 PM 
`To: Adam Kessel <Kessel@fr.com> 
`Cc: David Healey <Healey@fr.com>; nmorgan@wsgr.com; Michael Levin <mlevin@wsgr.com>; Bailey Harris 
`<bharris@fr.com> 
`Subject: Re: TTI v. TS/IBG ‐ Protective Order Issue re CBM 
`
`Adam,
`
`Just to clarify based on a question I have received from CBM counsel--we plan on filing certain of these and
`referencing them in the motion before the board to request that we can file them as supplemental information. I
`guess it is a two step process, so I assume there is no objection to either step. If I am wrong, please provide a
`basis for that distinction and availability to confer today or Monday.
`
`Thanks.
`
`On Jul 29, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Adam Kessel <Kessel@fr.com> wrote:
`
`
`
`Dear Jennifer:

`
`TradeStation and IBG will not argue that the District Court Protective Order 
`prevents TT from seeking leave to file a motion for supplemental information, or 
`from submitting the documents that have been produced in the litigation 
`specifically identified in Exhibit B to your July 27 email as well as the TradeStation 
`and IBG deposition transcripts you identified, to the PTAB under the PTAB 
`Protective Order, in the event that the PTAB permits TT to file supplemental 
`information. To be clear, TradeStation and IBG do not waive any potential 
`arguments opposing TT’s request to file supplemental information other than any 
`objection that might be based on the District Court Protective Order.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`


`
`We believe this agreement eliminates the need for a meet‐and‐confer today as 
`well as any motion practice before the District Court. If you believe there remains 
`any issues to discuss on this topic, plus let us know and we can speak at 1:30pm 
`CT / 2:30pm ET.

`
`Regards,

`
`Adam
`Adam J. Kessel :: Principal :: Fish & Richardson P.C.
`617 368 2180 direct :: kessel@fr.com
`fr.com :: Bio :: LinkedIn
`
`**************************************************************************************
`**************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
`email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`**************************************************************************************
`**************************************
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This message and any attachments may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to
`you in error, please reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and then delete the message from your system.
`
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
`and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`
`
`
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
`and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket