throbber
Paper No. ____
` Filed: May 12, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
`and IBFX, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners IBG, LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC,
`
`TradeStation Group, Inc., TradeStation Securities, Inc., TradeStation
`
`Technologies, Inc., and IBFX, Inc. Exhibits 2072 through 2103 were reserved for
`
`later use. Exhibit 2107 was filed on the PRPS and served via email to counsel of
`
`record for the Petitioner.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Exhibit 2003
`
`Exhibit 2004
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 13, 2015
`Attachment A to Letter to Director Lee: Trading Tech Int’l v
`BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C- 715 (N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 609
`Attachment B to Letter to Director Lee: Trading Tech Int’l v
`BGC Partners, Inc , Case No. 10-C- 715 (N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 613
`Email to Petitioner regarding Discovery, October 19, 2015
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 23, 2015
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG, Case No. 2014-1194 (CAFC), Docket No. 61, Brief for the
`Intervenor - Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office (May 1, 2014)
`Exhibit 2007 Meyers, Brad A. “A Brief History of Human-Computer
`Interaction Technology.” Interactions 5.2 (1998): 44-54
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`3
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`
`Exhibit 2013
`
`Exhibit 2014
`
`Exhibit 2015
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2021
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Senate Congressional Record, S936-S953 (Feb. 28, 2011)
`Crossing the Finish Line on Patent Reform: What Can and
`Should Be Done, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on
`Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet of the
`Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives (Feb. 11,
`2011)
`Exhibit 2019 Markup of H.R. 1249, The America Invents Act, House of
`Representatives Committee on the Judiciary (Apr. 14, 2011)
`Study and Report on the Implementation of the Leahy-Smith
`America Invents Act, USPTO Report to Congress (Sept. 2015)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 613, Supplemental Response of Certain
`Defendants to TT’s Emergency Motion (July 20, 2015)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Transcript of Proceedings - Motion (Sept. 10, 2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, Ex. 1032, Declaration of
`Kendyl A. Román (May 17, 2014)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, Ex. 2097, Declaration of
`Harold Abilock (March 6, 2015)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 176, Defendants’ Case Management Statement
`for May 5, 2011 Status Hearing (May 3, 2011)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 528, Position Statement of the TD Ameritrade
`Defendants on the Federal Circuit’s Decision in OEC and How
`this Case Should Proceed (Feb. 20, 2014)
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc., Case No. 1:10-
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 562, Reply Memorandum in
`Support of the IBG Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings
`Pursuant to Section 18(b) of the America Invents Act (June 18,
`2014)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners,Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 558, TradeStation Defendants’ Joinder In and
`Motion for Stay (June 11, 2014)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners,Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 546, Memorandum in Support of the TD
`Ameritrade Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to
`Section 18(b) of the America Invents Act (May 22, 2014)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 609, Response of Certain Defendants to Trading
`Technologies’ “Emergency” Motion (July 15, 2015)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. TradeStation Securities, Inc. Case No. 10-
`cv-884 (N.D. Ill.), TradeStation Securities, Inc.’s and
`TradeStation Group, Inc.’s Initial Invalidity Contentions
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 2.3 (Oct. 12, 2010)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,993,572 B2
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Volume 11-A Trial Transcript of Proceedings
`(Sept. 26, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (Oct. 10, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Instructions (Oct. 10, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc. et al. , Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Dkt. 1140, Notification of Docket Entry (Jan. 3, 2008)
`79 Fed. Reg. 74618- 633, USPTO 2014 Interim Guidance on
`Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (Dec. 16, 2014)
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`Guidelines (July 2015)
`The American Heritage College Dictionary Fourth Edition, 100
`(2002): Definition of “Axis”
`Notice of Allowance 09/590,692 (Feb. 10, 2004)
`Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate
`90/008,576 (Jan. 16, 2008)
`Decision Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination
`90/011,250 (July 15, 2011)
`5
`
`Exhibit 2028
`
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`Exhibit 2032
`Exhibit 2033
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`Exhibit 2036
`
`Exhibit 2037
`
`Exhibit 2038
`
`Exhibit 2039
`
`Exhibit 2040
`Exhibit 2041
`
`Exhibit 2042
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`Information Disclosure Statement 90/008,576 (Sept. 26, 2008)
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Supplemental Invalidity Contentions of eSpeed, Inc.,
`eSpeed International, Ltd., Ecco LLC, and EccoWare Ltd. (May
`25, 2007)
`Petition to Make Special Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.102(d) 09/590,692
`(Aug. 21, 2000)
`Excerpts from File History of 09/590,692, Information
`Disclosure Statements signed by Examiner (various dates)
`Corrected Request for Ex Parte Reexamination 90/008,576 (May
`25, 2007)
`Information Disclosure Statement 90/008,576 (Feb. 28, 2008)
`Request for Reexamination 90/011,250 (Sept. 22, 2010)
`Non-Final Rejection 09/590,692 (June 8, 2001)
`Reserved
`Smith, Warren, Subpoena Honyaku English - Japanese
`Translation List, Google Group Discussion Web Page Print out
`(Aug. 24, 2007)
`Submission of Publications, etc., PCT 2004-504652 (Apr. 18,
`2005) (Japanese language original)
`Submission of Publications, etc., PCT 2004-504652 (Ap. 18,
`2005) (Translation)
`Certification of Translation (Nov. 15, 2005)
`Japanese Patent 2004-504652
`Auroratm: The Most Technologically Advanced Trading System
`Available Today, Aurora Chicago Board of Trade
`Rosenthal Collins Group LLC Notice of Opposition to a
`European Patent, EP1319211 (Jan. 12, 2006)
`Deutsche Börse AG Notice of Opposition to a European Patent,
`EP1319211 (Jan. 12, 2006)
`Eccoware Limited Notice of Opposition to a European Patent,
`EP1319211 (Jan. 13, 2006)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-
`cv-4811 (N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 105, Memorandum Opinion and Order
`(Oct. 31, 2006)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-
`cv-4811 (N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 1043, CQG’s Reply Brief Regarding the
`Patent-Ineligibility/Invalidity of the TT Patents-In-Suit Under 35
`6
`
`Exhibit 2043
`Exhibit 2044
`
`Exhibit 2045
`
`Exhibit 2046
`
`Exhibit 2047
`
`Exhibit 2048
`Exhibit 2049
`Exhibit 2050
`Exhibit 2051
`Exhibit 2052
`
`Exhibit 2053
`
`Exhibit 2054
`
`Exhibit 2055
`Exhibit 2056
`Exhibit 2057
`
`Exhibit 2058
`
`Exhibit 2059
`
`Exhibit 2060
`
`Exhibit 2061
`
`Exhibit 2062
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`
`U.S.C. § 101 (Feb. 17, 2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000137, TDA Ex. 1050,
`Deposition of Harold Abilock (Apr. 24, 2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading Techs.
`Int’l, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131, Petitioners’ Reply to
`Patent Owner’s Response, Paper 48 (May 29, 2015)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-
`cv-4811 (N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 898, Redacted CQG’s Opening Brief
`Regarding the Patent-Ineligibility/Invalidity of the TT Patents-In-
`Suit Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Feb. 2, 2015)
`Response to Communication Pursuant to Article 101(1) and Rule
`81(2) to (3) EPC dated 1 Dec. 2010 (the "Article 101(1)
`Communication"), Opposition to EP1319211 (June 14, 2011)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 550, Memorandum in Support of the IBG
`Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to Section
`18(b) of the America Invents Act (June 2, 2014)
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Dkt. 553, CQG’s Position Statement Regarding TD
`Ameritrade’s Motion to Stay (June 4, 2014)
`Response to the Office Action Mailed April 18, 2008, Appl. No.
`11/585,966
`Comments on Allowance, Appl. No. 11/415,163 (July 19, 2010)
`Served
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`
`7
`
`Exhibit 2063
`
`Exhibit 2064
`
`Exhibit 2065
`
`Exhibit 2066
`
`Exhibit 2067
`
`Exhibit 2068
`
`Exhibit 2069
`
`Exhibit 2070
`Exhibit 2071
`Exhibit 2072
`Exhibit 2073
`Exhibit 2074
`Exhibit 2075
`Exhibit 2076
`Exhibit 2077
`Exhibit 2078
`Exhibit 2079
`Exhibit 2080
`Exhibit 2081
`Exhibit 2082
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`
`Exhibit 2083
`Exhibit 2084
`Exhibit 2085
`Exhibit 2086
`Exhibit 2087
`Exhibit 2088
`Exhibit 2089
`Exhibit 2090
`Exhibit 2091
`Exhibit 2092
`Exhibit 2093
`Exhibit 2094
`Exhibit 2095
`Exhibit 2096
`Exhibit 2097
`Exhibit 2098
`Exhibit 2099
`Exhibit 2100
`Exhibit 2102
`Exhibit 2103
`Exhibit 2104
`Exhibit 2105
`Exhibit 2106
`Exhibit 2107
`
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Served
`Served
`Served
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated May 11,
`2016
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`
`
`
`Description
`Declaration of Cory C. Bell
`Table of Contents from CBM2015-00181 Petition (Exhibit 1019)
`Table of Contents from CBM2015-00182 Petition (Exhibit 1007)
`Futures/Option Purchasing System: Trading Terminal Operation
`Guide
`
`
`
`Served Exhibits
`
`Exhibits
`Exhibit 2071
`Exhibit 2104
`Exhibit 2105
`Exhibit 2106
`
`Dated: May 12, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rachel L. Emsley/
` Rachel L. Emsley, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 63,558
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc
`
`9
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00181
`U.S. Patent 7,676,411
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibit 2107 were served on May 12, 2016,
`
`via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Robert Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Richard Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`CBM41919-0008CP1@fr.com
`
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Date: May 12, 2016
`
`/Valencia Daniel/
`Valencia Daniel
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket