`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and
`IBFX, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`_________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`via PTAB E2E
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`via Express Mail
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`c/o Office of the General Counsel, 10B20
`Madison Building East
`600 Dulany Street
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`via CM/ECF
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`1
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 and 142, and 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.2 and 90.3,
`
`Patent Owner, Trading Technologies International, Inc. (TT), hereby provides
`
`notice that it appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`from the Final Written Decision (Paper 143) entered on February 17, 2017, from
`
`the Decision Denying Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 145) entered
`
`April 27, 2017, and from all underlying orders, decisions, rulings, institutions, and
`
`opinions regarding U.S. Patent 7,533,056 (“the ’056 patent”) at issue in Covered
`
`Business Method No. CBM2015-00179. This notice of appeal is timely filed
`
`because it is filed within 63 days of the April 27, 2017 Decision (Paper 145)
`
`Denying Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), the issues on appeal include,
`
`but may not be limited to:
`
`(1) the Board’s determination that it had jurisdiction to issue the Final
`
`Written Decision because the ‘056 patent is a covered business method patent
`
`under § 18 of the America Invents Act;
`
`(2) the Board’s determination that claims 1-15 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103;
`
`(3) the Board’s determination that claims 1-15 are ineligible under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 101;
`
`2
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`(4) the Board’s claim constructions, failure to construe terms, and/or
`
`determination of the level of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention;
`
`(5) the Board’s determination that a cited reference qualifies as prior art
`
`because it was publicly accessible under 35 U.S.C. § 102; and
`
`(6) the Board’s determination that the invention of the ‘056 patent was not
`
`conceived before the alleged prior art date of a Tokyo Stock Exchange document;
`
`
`
`(7) the Board’s determination that the invention of the ‘056 patent was not
`
`actually reduced to practice;
`
`(8) the Board’s determination that the Applicant for the ‘056 patent was not
`
`diligent from the alleged prior art date of a Tokyo Stock Exchange document until
`
`constructively reducing the invention to practice;
`
`(9) the Board’s denial and dismissal as moot of Patent Owner’s motion to
`
`exclude evidence;
`
`(10) the unconstitutionality of the Transitional Program for Covered
`
`Business Method Patents and Covered Business Method Review (AIA § 18) under
`
`Article III, the Seventh Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment of the United States
`
`Constitution; and
`
`(11) any other findings or determinations supporting or related to the
`
`aforementioned issues, as well as all other issues decided adversely to Patent
`
`Owner in any order, decision, ruling, or opinion.
`
`3
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`The remedy sought on appeal is vacatur of the Final Written Decision, see
`
`Secure Axcess, LLC v. PNC Bank Nat'l Ass'n, No. 2016-1353, 2017 WL 676601,
`
`*9 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2017), and/or, at a minimum, reversal of the Final Written
`
`Decision.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 142 and 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a), this Notice is being
`
`filed with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and a
`
`copy of this Notice is being concurrently filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal
`
`Board. In addition, a copy of this Notice along with the required docketing fees are
`
`being filed with the Clerk’s Office for the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit via CM/ECF.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 29, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT &
`BERGHOFF LLP
`
`/Jennifer M. Kurcz/
`
`Jennifer M. Kurcz,
`Back-Up Counsel, Reg. No. 54,481
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 913-0001
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`I hereby certify that on this 29th day of June, 2017, a true and correct copy of
`
`the foregoing “PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL” was mailed via
`
`Express mail to the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, at
`
`the following address:
`
`Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`c/o Office of the General Counsel
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`I also herby certify that on this 29th day of June, 2017, a true and correct
`
`
`
`copy of the foregoing “PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL,” and the
`
`filing fee, were filed with the Clerk’s Office of the United States Court of Appeals
`
`for the Federal Circuit, via CM/ECF.
`
`I also herby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing “PATENT
`
`OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL,” was served by electronic mail on this 29th day
`
`of June, 2017 on counsel of record for the Petitioners as follows:
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Richard M. Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 29, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`phillips@fr.com
`CBM41919-0007CP1@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Cole B. Richter/
`Cole B. Richter,
`Counsel for Patent Owner,
`Reg. No. 65,398
`
`By:
`
`6
`
`