throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and
`IBFX, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. ____
`
` Filed: June 16, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners IBG, LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC,
`
`TradeStation Group, Inc., TradeStation Securities, Inc., TradeStation
`
`Technologies, Inc., and IBFX, Inc. Exhibits 2108 through 2139 are reserved for
`
`later use. Exhibit 2140 through 2158 were filed on the PRPS and served via email
`
`to counsel of record for the Petitioner.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 23, 2015
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG, Case No. 2014-1194 (CAFC), Docket No. 61, Brief for the
`Intervenor - Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office (May 1, 2014)
`Exhibit 2003 Meyers, Brad A. “A Brief History of Human-Computer
`Interaction Technology.” Interactions 5.2 (1998): 44-54
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2019
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2021
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Exhibit 2013
`Exhibit 2014
`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Senate Congressional Record, S936-S953 (Feb. 28, 2011)
`Crossing the Finish Line on Patent Reform: What Can and
`Should Be Done, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on
`Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet of the
`Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives (Feb. 11,
`2011)
`Exhibit 2015 Markup of H.R. 1249, The America Invents Act, House of
`Representatives Committee on the Judiciary (Apr. 14, 2011)
`Study and Report on the Implementation of the Leahy-Smith
`America Invents Act, USPTO Report to Congress (Sept. 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 613, Supplemental Response of Certain
`Defendants to TT’s Emergency Motion (July 20, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Transcript of Proceedings - Motion (September 10,
`2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading
`Technologies International, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131,
`Declaration of Kendyl A. Román (May 17, 2014)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading
`Technologies International, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131,
`Declaration of Harold Abilock (March 6, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 176, Defendants’ Case Management Statement
`for May 5, 2011 Status Hearing (May 30, 2011)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 528, Position Statement of the TD Ameritrade
`Defendants on the Federal Circuit’s Decision in OEC and How
`this Case Should Proceed (Feb. 20, 2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 562, Reply
`Memorandum in Support of the IBG Defendants’ Motion to Stay
`Proceedings Pursuant to Section 18(b) of the America Invents
`Act (Jun. 18, 2014)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 558, TradeStation Defendants’ Joinder In and
`Motion for Stay (June 11, 2014)
`3
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 546, Memorandum in Support of the TD
`Ameritrade Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to
`Section 18(b) of the America Invents Act (May 22, 2014)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 609, Response of Certain Defendants to Trading
`Technologies’ “Emergency” Motion (July 15, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v TradeStation Securities, Inc. and
`TradeStation Group, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-884 (N.D.Ill.),
`TradeStation Securities, Inc.’s and TradeStation Group, Inc.’s
`Initial Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 2.3
`(October 12, 2010)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,993,572 B2
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., Ecco LLC and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No.
`1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.), Volume 11-A Trial Transcript of
`Proceedings (September 26, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Instruction Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc. et al. , Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Dkt. 1140, Notification of Docket Entry (January 3, 2008)
`79 Fed. Reg. 74618- 633, USPTO 2014 Interim Guidance on
`Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (December 16, 2014)
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`Guidelines
`The American Heritage College Dictionary Fourth Edition, 100
`(2002): Definition of “Axis”
`Served
`Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination 90/013,578 (Jan. 28,
`2016)
`Reserved
`
`Served
`Reserved
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2028
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`Exhibit 2032
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`Exhibit 2036
`Exhibit 2037
`
`Exhibit 2038 –
`Exhibit 2102
`Exhibit 2103
`Exhibit 2104
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`Reserved
`Reserved
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated May 11,
`2016
`Reserved
`
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated June 13,
`2016
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated June 14,
`2016
`Trading Techs. Int’l v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D. Ill.), Transcript of Proceedings (May 12, 2016)
`TS0028765
`TS0107054
`TS0024612
`TS1261405
`TS1268720
`TS1533977
`TS1525667
`Video Deposition Transcript of John Bartleman, dated June 8,
`2016 in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BGC
`Parnters, Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-715 (Consolidated) (N.D. Ill.).
`Draft Video Deposition Transcript of John Bartleman, dated June
`9, 2016 in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BGC
`Parnters, Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-715 (Consolidated) (N.D. Ill.).
`Listing Additional Discovery Sought: Produced Documents and
`Transcripts
`Listing of Additional Discovery Sought: Documents Withheld in
`District Court
`Video Deposition Transcript of Milan Galik, dated June 13, 2016
`in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BGC Parnters,
`Inc., Case No. 1:10-cv-715 (Consolidated) (N.D. Ill.).
`Relevance of Additional Discovery Sought
`IBG_00026004
`IBG_00040515
`IBG_00014726
`
`5
`
`Exhibit 2105
`Exhibit 2106
`Exhibit 2107
`
`Exhibit 2108 –
`Exhibit 2139
`Exhibit 2140
`
`Exhibit 2141
`
`Exhibit 2142
`
`Exhibit 2143
`Exhibit 2144
`Exhibit 2145
`Exhibit 2146
`Exhibit 2147
`Exhibit 2148
`Exhibit 2149
`Exhibit 2150
`
`Exhibit 2151
`
`Exhibit 2152
`
`Exhibit 2153
`
`Exhibit 2154
`
`Exhibit 2155
`Exhibit 2156
`Exhibit 2157
`Exhibit 2158
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`Description
`Declaration of Cory C. Bell
`U.S. Patent No. 6,803,931 to Roman (‘931 patent”)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rachel L. Emsley/
` Rachel L. Emsley, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 63,558
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`6
`
`
`Served Exhibits
`
`Exhibits
`Exhibit 2036
`Exhibit 2103
`
`Dated: June 16, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibits 2140-2158 were served on June 16,
`
`2016, via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Lori Gordon
`lgordon@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`phillips@fr.com
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibits 2140-42, 2152-53, and 2155, were
`
`served on June 16, 2016, via email directed to all counsel of record:
`
`Robert Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`Lori Gordon
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`Richard Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`John C. Phillips
`CBM41919-0007CP1@fr.com
`PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`/Valencia Daniel/
`Valencia Daniel
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: June 16, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket