` Filed: March 9, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00172
`U.S. Patent 7,783,556
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00172
`U.S. Patent 7,783,556
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners TradeStation Group, Inc. and TradeStation
`
`Securities, Inc.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Exhibit 2003
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Trading Tech Int’l v CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-
`Exhibit 2001
`cv-4811 (N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 1073, Memorandum Opinion and Order
`denying Motion for Summary Judgment (35 U.S.C. § 101) (Feb.
`24, 2015)
`79 Fed. Reg. 74618- 633, USPTO 2014 Interim Guidance on
`Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (December 16, 2014)
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`Guidelines
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 609, Response of Certain Defendants to Trading
`Technologies’ “Emergency” Motion (July 15, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Incm, Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 613, Supplemental Response of Certain
`Defendants to TT’s Emergency Motion (July 20, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 176, Defendants’ Case Management Statement
`for May 5, 2011 Status Hearing (May 30, 2011)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 528, Position Statement of the TD Ameritrade
`Defendants on the Federal Circuit’s Decision in OEC and How
`this Case Should Proceed (Feb. 20, 2014)
`Transcript of Teleconference Call with the Board, dated
`September 10, 2015
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 546, Memorandum in Support of the TD
`Ameritrade Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to
`Section 18(b) of the America Invents Act (May 22, 2014)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C- 715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 558, TradeStation Defendants’ Joinder In and
`Motion for Stay (June 11, 2014)
`2
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2011
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2013
`
`Exhibit 2015
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Case CBM2015-00172
`U.S. Patent 7,783,556
`Senate Congressional Record, S936-S953 (Feb. 28, 2011)
`Crossing the Finish Line on Patent Reform: What Can and
`Should Be Done, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on
`Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet of the
`Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives (Feb. 11,
`2011)
`Study and Report on the Implementation of the Leahy-Smith
`America Invents Act, USPTO Report to Congress (Sept. 2015)
`Exhibit 2014 Markup of H.R. 1249, The America Invents Act, House of
`Representatives Committee on the Judiciary (Apr. 14, 2011)
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG, Case No. 2014-1194 (CAFC), Docket No. 61, Brief for the
`Intervenor - Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office (May 1, 2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 562, Reply
`Memorandum in Support of the IBG Defendants’ Motion to Stay
`Proceedings Pursuant to Section 18(b) of the America Invents
`Act (Jun. 18, 2014)
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2019
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2021
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00172
`U.S. Patent 7,783,556
`Exhibit 2026 Meyers, Brad A. “A Brief History of Human-Computer
`Interaction Technology.” Interactions 5.2 (1998): 44-54.
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 23, 2015
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`March 7, 2016
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2028
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rachel L. Emsley/
`Rachel L. Emsley, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 63,558
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 9, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case CBM2015-00172
`U.S. Patent 7,783,556
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibit 2028 were served on March 9, 2016,
`
`via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`John C. Phillips
`phillips@fr.com
`
`Kevin Su
`CBM41919-0002CP1@fr.com
`
`
`Date: March 9, 2016
`
`/Valencia Daniel/
`Valencia Daniel
`Litigation Clerk
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP