`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2094
`TRADESTATION v TRADING TECH
`CBM2015-00161
`
`
`
`Page|2
`
`Furthermore, for the same reasons set forth in our First and Second Letters, the ’OSS patent
`
`is not a covered business method patent within the jurisdictional scope of Section 18. Like the
`
`patents discussed in our First and Second Letters, the ’055 patent claims are not directed to a
`
`business method or practice. Rather, they are directed to technology — particular structural and
`
`filnctional features of a GUI tool. The claims were found by the USPTO to be novel and non-
`
`obvious over other GUI prior art based on the claimed GUI features — not based on alleged
`
`innovations in the steps of a business process or practice.
`
`Therefore, for the same reasons set forth in our First and Second Letters, TT respectfillly
`
`requests that you exercise your discretion as Director (pursuant to, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. §§ 324-325
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.208) to also promptly deny institution of this new petition.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`ay Q. Knoblqclih
`
`ensing & Litigation
`Director of IP
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`cc:
`
`John C. Phillips (phillips@fr.com);
`Robert E. Sokohl (rsokohl@skgf.com);
`Erika H. Arner (erika.amer@finnegan.com);
`Steven F. Borsand (steve.borsand@tradingtechnologies.com).
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Page 2 of 2