`Filed: October 10, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.,
`TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., IBG LLC, and
`INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case CBM2015-001611
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`
`1 Case CBM2016-00035 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Relief Requested
`Pursuant to this Board’s authorization on October 10, 2019, Trading
`
`Technologies International, Inc. (“TT” or “Patent Owner”), respectfully requests
`
`that all confidential information filed by Patent Owner be expunged from the
`
`record pursuant to Rule 42.56 and not be made public. Patent Owner has conferred
`
`with Petitioner on this request and Petitioner does not oppose.
`
`II.
`
`Reasons Why Requested Relief Should Be Granted
`A. The Board Found Good Cause to Seal Patent Owner’s Confidential
`Information
`In connection with its Patent Owner’s Response, TT filed four Motions to
`
`Seal. (Papers 53, 62, 91 and 93). These motions covered certain pleadings,
`
`declarations and exhibits containing or referring to Patent Owner’s confidential
`
`business information. (Papers 54, 63, 68, 89, and 94; Exhibits 2169, 2172, 2224,
`
`2225, 2232, 2247, 2270, 2286, 2294, and 2295).
`
`All four Motions to Seal were granted (Paper 130). Such information should
`
`be expunged because this Board has already found that there was good cause to
`
`grant the motions to seal in the first instance. (Paper 130, at 3). Specifically, TT
`
`identified that the sealed papers contain sensitive business information that would
`
`not otherwise be published or made available to the public. As this information
`
`was not relied on in the Final Written Decision here, expunging the confidential
`
`material does not impact the public interest in obtaining access to these
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`proceedings. Further, any impact to the public interest has been minimized as non-
`
`confidential versions of the papers have already been filed. (Id.).
`
`On February 13, 2019, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Final Written
`
`Decision of the Board in this case, and the formal mandate issued on May 7, 2019.
`
`On July 24, 2019, Petitioner IB filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which the
`
`Supreme Court denied on October 7, 2019. Because the appeals in this case have
`
`been concluded, this motion to expunge is now ripe for decision.
`
`B. The Sealed Documents Contain Confidential and Sensitive Business
`Information that was not Relied on by the Board in the Final Written
`Decision
`For the same reasons set forth in Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal, namely
`
`that the sealed information “contain[s] sensitive business information that would
`
`not otherwise be published or made available to the public,” all the information
`
`filed under seal in this matter should be expunged from the record. Expunging the
`
`sealed information will avoid the prejudice to the parties that would be caused by
`
`public disclosure of their sealed information. The information Patent Owner seeks
`
`to have expunged after the disposition of appeals is as follows: Papers 54, 63, 68,
`
`89, and 94, and Exhibits 2169, 2172, 2224, 2225, 2232, 2247, 2270, 2286, 2294,
`
`and 2295.
`
`Because Patent Owner has already filed redacted versions of the sealed
`
`documents, expunging confidential materials after appeal addresses the “public
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history for public notice
`
`purposes” while protecting the confidential and proprietary information of other
`
`parties. (See 77 FED. REG. 48623). A short summary of these materials follows.
`
`First, Patent Owner’s Motion for Additional Discovery (Paper 54) was not
`
`cited in the Board’s Final Written Decision and contains (1) confidential
`
`information consisting of internal TradeStation documents relating to its products
`
`and customers, (2) the deposition transcripts of Mr. Bartleman (TradeStation’s
`
`President) and Mr. Galik (IB’s head of software development) and (3) quotations
`
`from those documents and transcripts. This information has not been published or
`
`otherwise made public. The redacted information is not specifically referenced in
`
`the Board’s final decision.
`
`Second, the redacted versions of Confidential Patent Owner’s Response
`
`(Paper 63) and Confidential Corrected Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 68) were
`
`cited in the Board’s Final Written Decision and contain declarations and exhibits
`
`that contain highly sensitive, non-public information that a business would not
`
`make public. Specifically, the redacted portions of Patent Owner’s Response
`
`(Paper 64) and Corrected Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 69) contain business
`
`sensitive statements in the context of licensing Patent Owner’s products, and
`
`business strategy information. The redacted information is not specifically
`
`referenced in the Board’s final decision.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`Third, the redacted versions of Patent Owner’s Motion to Submit
`
`Supplemental Information and Briefing Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.223(b) (Paper 90)
`
`and Patent Owner’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Submit Supplemental
`
`Information and Briefing Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.223(b) (Paper 95) contain
`
`confidential information consisting of discussions relating to Petitioners’
`
`confidential information. Petitioners indicated that this information has not been
`
`published or otherwise made public. The redacted information is not specifically
`
`referenced in the Board’s final decision.
`
`Fourth, the confidential information in Exhibits 2169, 2172, 2224, 2225,
`
`2232, 2247, 2270, 2286, 2294, and 2295 were not cited or relied upon in the
`
`Board’s Final Written Decision. (Paper 130, at 2). These exhibits contain highly
`
`sensitive and proprietary Patent Owner information, including internal financial
`
`information, third-party business strategy information, and third-party admissions
`
`and statements.
`
`III. Conclusion
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that, because all appeals have been
`
`exhausted in this matter, the sealed materials be expunged from the CBM docket.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Dated: October 10, 2019
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Jennifer M. Kurcz/
`
`Jennifer M. Kurcz
`Back-Up Counsel, Reg. No. 54,481
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`One North Wacker Drive
`Suite 4500
`Chicago, IL 60606
`312-416-6282
`jkurcz@bakerlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00161
`U.S. Patent 6,766,304
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 10, 2019, a copy of
`
`the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE was served via e-
`
`mail on the following:
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl@skgf.com
`
`John C. Phillips
`phillips@fr.com
`
`Kevin Su
`CBM41919-0005CP1@fr.com
`
`Michael T. Rosato
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`
`Matthew A. Argenti
`margenti@wsgr.com
`
`/Jennifer M. Kurcz/
`Jennifer M. Kurcz
`Back-Up Counsel, Reg. No. 54,481
`BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
`One North Wacker Drive
`Suite 4500
`Chicago, IL 60606
`312-416-6282
`jkurcz@bakerlaw.com
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`7
`
`