`
`Paper No. 14
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Ocean Tomo, LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PatentRatings, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case: CBM20l5—00157
`
`Patent No. 9,075,849 B2
`
`Mail Stop PA TENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S.P.T.O.
`
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`PETITIONER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`CHICAGO/#2779487.1
`
`
`
`Paper No. 14
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.63(e), Petitioner Ocean Tomo, LLC hereby
`
`submits a current listing of Petitioner’s Exhibits to counsel for Patent Owner
`
`PatentRatings, LLC.
`
`Exhibits 1001-1025 were previously provided. Exhibits 1026 and 1027 are
`
`attached hereto.
`
`F““‘E""“"‘
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1001:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,075,849 (the “’849 Patent”)
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1002:
`
`
`License Agreement among Patent Ratings, Jonathan
`A. Barney, and Ocean Tomo, LLC and amendments
`thereto
`
`Petition Exhibit 1003:
`
`Declaration of Dr. Patrick Thomas
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1004:
`Ocean Tomo Complaint in Ocean Tomo, LLC v.
`
`Jonathan Barney and Patent Ratings LLC, Case
`No. 12 C 8450 (N.D. Ill.)
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1005 :
`Amended Counterclaim of Jonathan Barney and
`PatentRatings, LLC in Ocean Tomo LLC v. Jonathan
`
`Barney and Patent Ratings LLC, 12 C 8450 (N.D. 111.)
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1006:
`Defendants and Counter-Plaintiff PatentRatings,
`LLC’s Second Set of Interrogatories, served in Ocean
`
`Tomo LLC v. Jonathan Barney and Patent Ratings
`
`LLC, 12 C 8450 (N.D. Ill.)
`
` Petition Exhibit 1007:
`Plaintiff—Counter Defendant’s Motion for Summary
`Judgment of Invalidity under 35 USC § 101 filed in
`
`Ocean Tomo LLC v. Jonathan Barney and Patent
`Ratings LLC, 12 C 8450 G\T.D. 111.)
`
`
`
` Petition Exhibit 1008:
`
`Joe Matal, A Guide to the Legislative History of the
`America Invents Act: Part II ofII, 21 Fed. Cir. B. J.
`
`539
`
`
`
`CHICAGO/#2779487.l
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 14
`
`Petition Exhibit 1009:
`
`157 Cong. Rec. S1360—94 (daily ed. Mar. 8, 2011)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1010:
`
`Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., No. 2: 12—cV-
`00800, 2015 WL 3452469 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2015).
`
`Petition Exhibit 1011:
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 157
`(Aug. 14, 2012)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1012:
`
`Bascom Research, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., No. 3-12-
`
`Petition Exhibit 1013:
`
`cV—06293, 2015 WL 149480 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2015,
`Order)
`
`Vehicle Intelligence & Safety LLC v. Mercea’es—Benz
`USA, LLC, No. 13 C 4417, 2015 WL 394273 (N.D.
`111. Jan. 29, 2015, Order)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1014:
`
`In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, No. 2014-
`1301, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Jul. 8, 2015)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1015:
`
`Versata Development Group v. SAP America, Inc. ,
`No. 2014-1194, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2015)
`(“Versata”)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1016:
`
`Original Prosecution History of the ’849 Patent
`
`Petition Exhibit 1017:
`
`Petition Exhibit 1018:
`
`Transitional Program for Covered Business Method
`Patents—Definitions of Covered Business Method
`
`Patent and Technological Invention, 77 Fed. Reg.
`48734 (Aug. 14, 2012)
`
`SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group,
`No. CBM20l2-00001, Paper 36 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 9,
`2013) (afi”a' Versata Development Group v. SAP
`America, Inc., No. 2014-1194 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2015))
`(“SAP”)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1019:
`
`Google, Inc. v. Unwirea’ Planet, LLC, No. CBM2014-
`00006, Paper 11 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 8, 2014)
`
`CHICAGO/#2779487}
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Paper No. 14
`
`
`
`
`Salesforce. com, Inc. v. VirtualAgilily, Inc.,
`Petition Exhibit 1020:
`No. CBM2013—00024, Paper 47 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 16,
`2014)
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1021: CRS Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Frontline
`Technologies, Inc., No. CBM2012—000O5, Paper 66
`
`(P.T.A.B. Jan. 21, 2014)
`
` Petition Exhibit 1022:
`Data Distribution Techs. v. Brer Afliliates, No. 12-
`4878 (JBS/KMW), 2014 WL 4162765 (D.N.J. Aug.
`
`
`19, 2014)
`
`Petition Exhibit 1023:
`
` OIP Techs, Inc. V. Amazon. Com, Inc., No. 1012-1696,
`2015 WL 3622181 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 11, 2015)
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1024:
`
`
`P1aintiff—Counter Defendant’s Memorandum in
`Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of
`
`Invalidity under 35 USC § 101 filed in Ocean Tomo
`
`LLC v. Jonathan Barney and Patent Ratings LLC, 12
`C 8450 O\I.D. I11.)
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1025:
`American Express Co. v. Metasearch Sys., LLC,
`No. CBM2014—O0001, Paper 70 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 13,
`
`2015)
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Exhibit 1026:
`
`PatentRatings’ Arbitration Brief for Arbitration No.
`73117 Y 0004711
`
`Petition Exhibit 1027:
`
`Supplemental License Agreement among Patent
`Ratings, Jonathan A. Barney, and Ocean Tomo, LLC
`
`and amendments thereto
`
`
`
`CHICAGO/#2779487.1
`
`iv
`
`
`
`Paper No. 14
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`Exhibit List, Exhibit 1026, and Exhibit 1027 were served Via email directed to
`
`counsel of record for the Patent Owner at the following:
`
`James Cooke
`
`j arnes.cooke@f1nnegan.com
`
`Joshua Goldberg
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`
`Dated: December 1, 2015
`
`
`
` By:
`
`./-I
`4
`I
`Robert S. Rigg
`Registration No. 36,991
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
