CONCLUSION OF MORNING
`BUSINESS
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Morning
`business is closed.
`
`-~??
`- :?
`81360
`March 8, 2011
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE
`So if you vote for H.R. 1, you are cut(cid:173)
`bill that we passed last year. Well,
`The assistant bill clerk proceeded to
`ting student a id. If you vote for H.R. 1,
`what does that mean? Well, that means
`call the roll.
`Mr. LEAHY. I ask unanimous con(cid:173)
`you are going to slash job training pro(cid:173)
`right now, in law, because of the Af(cid:173)
`sent that the order for the quorum call
`grams. The House bill that came over,
`fordable Care Act we passed last year,
`be rescinded.
`H.R. 1, completely eliminates Federal
`kids can stay on their parents' policy
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`funding for adult training, dislocated
`until they are age 26. That would be
`objection. it is so order ed.
`worker assistance and youth training
`gone. The question would be, the ones
`programs, completely eliminates it .
`who got on before this, will they be
`These programs provide job training
`able to stay on? But I can tell you, no
`and reemployment services to about 8
`new kids would ever be allowed to stay
`million Americans every year, 8 mil(cid:173)
`on their parents' policy until they are
`lion. They just do away with it.
`age 26.
`If you vote for H.R. 1, you are voting
`We put in-and as you know, it is in
`to slash the community services block
`law right now-thac an insurance com(cid:173)
`pany cannot impose a lifetime limit on
`grant. Well, they cut about $305 million
`from that. That provides services to
`individuals. That was in the bill last
`some of our lowest income people and
`year. That would be gone. They can
`elderly. If you vote for H.R. 1, you are
`start reinstituting lifetime limits and
`voting to cut investments in
`infra(cid:173)
`annual limits.
`Also we had a pl'ovision in the bill
`structure, highway funding, sewer and
`drinking water funds, and rural eco(cid:173)
`that provided for a medical loss provi(cid:173)
`nomic development funding because
`sion. Let me try t o explain that.
`In our bill we said insurers and
`H.R. 1 slashes community development
`health insurance companies have to
`block grants by 62 percent.
`pay at least 80 cents of every dollar of
`Now, I say go out and talk to your
`premium they collect on health care
`mayot·s, t alk to your city council, talk
`rather than profits, bonuses, overhead,
`to your boards of supervisors in your
`counties. Ask them if they can take a
`fancy buildings, and corporate jets and
`all of that. They had to pay- 80 cents
`62-percent cut in their community de(cid:173)
`of every premium dollar has to go for
`velopment block grants and what it is
`health care. It is done away with under
`going to mean to them.
`Well, I cannot help but also speak to
`H.R. 1. We cannot enforce that at all.
`So, again, for those who have seen
`my own constituents in Iowa about
`what this means for my own State. If
`benefits to themselves from the health
`care bill we passed, whether it is keep(cid:173)
`H.R. 1, the House bill which passed the
`ing their kids on their policy or elderly
`House, if it were to be passed and en(cid:173)
`people now who get free mammograms
`acted
`into
`law- well,
`I mentioned
`about the cuts that we are having in
`and free colonoscopies and a
`free
`the Job Corps. It would basically kill
`health checkup e\·ery year with no
`the Denison, IA, Job Corps Center,
`copays, no deductibles, that ends. That
`ends with H.R. 1.
`which employs 163 people. It provides
`So the bill passed by the House is
`training to 450 at-risk students each
`just, as I said, bad policy, and it is bad
`year, and we have a new Job Corps Cen(cid:173)
`values. It is not the values of our coun(cid:173)
`ter just being built, just being opened
`try, and I hope the Senate will re(cid:173)
`in Ottumwa. That will probably just
`soundingly- resoundingly-defeat H.R.
`come to a screeching halt. It is sup(cid:173)
`1, consign it to the scrap heap of his(cid:173)
`posed to be opening later this year.
`It would shut down at least the com(cid:173)
`tory, the history of ill-advised ideas, of
`munity health center in Centerville,
`ill-advised. programs. There have been
`IA. That is H.R. 1. H.R. 1 would be cut(cid:173)
`a lot of them that have come along in
`ting down the community services
`the history of this country.
`Fortunately, I think the Congress in
`block grant and would shut down the
`Red Rock Community Action Agency
`most instances has turned them down,
`and we moved ahead. We can't afford to
`serving Boone, Jasper, Warren, Marion,
`go backward. H.R. 1 would do that. It
`and rural Polk County.
`H.R. 1, as I mentioned, would com(cid:173)
`would take this country back. We
`pletely eliminate funding for job train(cid:173)
`would lose jobs. It would cut kids out
`ing programs, which assisted more
`of getting an education, close down
`than 35,000 Iowans in the last year. As
`Head Star t centers. It would widen
`I mentioned, it would slash Pell grants
`that gulf between the rich and the
`for our kids who go to all of our col(cid:173)
`poor. We can't continue to go down
`leges in Iowa, the private not-for -prof(cid:173)
`that road. We don't want to wind up
`its and our Regents institutions. Two
`another Third World country where we
`thousand low-income Iowa kids who
`have a few at the top and everybody at
`now attend Head Start would be cut
`the bottom and nobody in between. The
`off.
`middle class built this country, and we
`Lastly, it is not only just the cuts
`cannot continue to erode the middle
`and the slashes to these vital programs
`class. That is what H.R. 1 would do,
`which will increase unemployment and
`erode the middle class and widen the
`send us back into another recession,
`gulf between the rich and poor.
`there are riders in this bill, what we
`I hope the Senate will recognize H.R.
`call legislative riders, that are per(cid:173)
`1 for what it is, a detriment, a body
`nicious. They do terrible damage to our
`blow to our recovery efforts. I hope the
`country.
`Senate will resoundingly defeat it.
`For example--just one-there is a
`I yield the floor and suggest the ab(cid:173)
`rider in the bill that says no money
`sence of a quorum.
`can be used or spent to continue the
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
`implementation of the health reform
`clerk will call the t•oll.
`
`PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2011-
`Continued
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, since the
`Senate began this debate on the Amer(cid:173)
`ican Invents Act more than a week
`ago, I have talked about American in(cid:173)
`genuity and innovation. As this debate
`comes to a close, I want to emphasize
`that this is legislation that should pro(cid:173)
`mote innovation, help create jobs, and
`help energize the economy as we con(cid:173)
`tinue our recovery. This legislation can
`be a key part of a jobs agenda. We can
`help unleash innovation an promote
`American invention, all without adding
`a penny to the deficit. This is common(cid:173)
`sense, bipartisan legislation.
`Innovation has been a cornerstone of
`the American economy from the time
`Thomas Jefferson examined the first
`patent to today. The Founders recog(cid:173)
`nized the importance of promoting in(cid:173)
`novation. A number were themselves
`inventors. The Constitution explicitly
`grants Congress the power to " promote
`the progress of science and useful arts,
`by securing for limited times to ... in(cid:173)
`ventors the exclusive right to their re(cid:173)
`spective . . . discoveries." The discov(cid:173)
`eries made by American inventors and
`research institutions, commercialized
`by American companies, and protected
`and promoted by American patent laws
`have made our system the envy of the
`world. The President has spoken all
`year about the need to win the future
`by out innovating our competition.
`This bill can play a key role in that ef(cid:173)
`fort.
`I
`commended Austan
`Yesterday,
`Goolsbee, the chair of the President's
`Council of Economic Advisers, for his
`white board presentation this week on
`the importance of patent reform to
`help America win the global competi(cid:173)
`tion and create jobs. The creation of
`more than 220.000 jobs in the private
`sector last month, the creation of 1.5
`million jobs over the last 12 months,
`and the unemployment rate finally
`being reduced to 8.9 percent are all
`signs that the efforts we have made
`over the last 2 years to stave off the
`worst recession since the Great Depres(cid:173)
`sion are paying off and the economic
`recovery is taking hold. The almost
`full percent point drop in the unem(cid:173)
`ployment rate over the last 3 months is
`the largest decline in unemployment
`since 1983. Despite interruptions of eco(cid:173)
`nomic activity in many parts of the
`country caused by winter weather over
`the last months and in recent days, de(cid:173)
`spite the extraordinary rise in oil
`
`Ocean Tomo Ex. 1009-001
`
`

`
`81361
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE
`March 8, 2011
`prices, the Dow Jones industrial aver(cid:173)
`tion that can create jobs and help ow·
`I also thank the many individuals,
`age has climbed back to over 12,000
`economy through common sense meas(cid:173)
`companies, associations and coalit ions
`that have helped with this effort_ This
`from a low point of 6,500. Passage of
`ures. That is what this bill can do. It
`legislation has been supported by both
`t he America Invents Act should help
`relies on not one dollat· of taxpayer
`business and labor, including the Na(cid:173)
`money. Let me emphasize, not a dime
`bolster our economic recovery and
`tional Association of Manufacturers,
`keep us on the right path toward busi(cid:173)
`in taxpayer money is spen t on the Pat(cid:173)
`the United Steelworkers , the AFL-CIO,
`ent and Trademark Office, PTO, re(cid:173)
`ness development and job creation.
`the Association of American Univer(cid:173)
`As we began this debate, I referred
`forms. They are all funded by patent
`sities, the American Bar Association,
`back to the President's State of the
`fees, not taxes.
`t he Association of Public and Land(cid:173)
`Union address and his challenge to the
`Innovation drives the Nation's econ(cid:173)
`Grant Universities, the Association of
`Nation to out-innovate, out-build a nd
`omy, and that ent repreneurial spirit
`American Medi cal Colleges, the Asso(cid:173)
`can only be protected by a patent sys(cid:173)
`out-educate our global compet itors.
`ciation of University Technology Man(cid:173)
`Enacting the America Invents Act is a
`tem that promotes invention and spurs
`agers, the American Council on Edu(cid:173)
`key to meeting this challenge. Reform(cid:173)
`new ideas. We need to reform our pat(cid:173)
`cation, the Council on Government Re(cid:173)
`ing the Nation 's antiQuated patent sys(cid:173)
`ent system so that these innovations
`lations, P hRMA, BIO, the Intellectual
`tem will promote American innova(cid:173)
`can more Quic kly get to market. A
`Property Owners Association,
`the
`t ion, create American jobs, and grow
`modernized patent system- one tha t
`American Intellectual Property Law
`America's economy. I thank the Presi(cid:173)
`puts American ent repreneurs on the
`Association, the Coalition for 21st Cen(cid:173)
`dent and his administration for their
`same playing field as those throughout
`tury P atent R eform, the Association
`help and support for the Leahy-Hatch(cid:173)
`the world-is a key to that success.
`for Competitive Technology, the Coali(cid:173)
`Grassley America Invents Act. Com(cid:173)
`This is an idea that. cuts across the po(cid:173)
`tion for Patent and Trademark Infor(cid:173)
`merce Secretary Locke has been a
`litical spectrum.
`mation Dissemination , IBM, General
`During Senate debate over the last
`strong partner in our efforts, and Di(cid:173)
`Electric, Eli Lilly and Company, Bose
`week our bill has been improved by a
`rector Kappos of the Patent and Trade(cid:173)
`Corporation, J ohnson and Johnson, 3M,
`number of Senators who have contrib(cid:173)
`mark Office has been an indispensable
`General Mills, Honeywell, Monsanto,
`uted amendments. Senators BENNET,
`source of wise counsel.
`Motorola, Cargill,
`Inc., Caterpillar,
`The America Invents Act will keep
`COONS, SCHUMER, MENENDEZ, PRYOR,
`Enventys, Abbott, Astra Zeneca,
`America in i ts longstanding position at
`STABENOW, BAUCUS, BINGAMAN, COBURN
`AdvaMed, Air Liquide, Bayer, Beckman
`the pinnacle of innovation. This bill
`and KIRK have a ll contl'ibuted, and I
`Coulter, Boston
`Scientific, BP,
`will establish a more efficient and
`thank them for working with us. Sen(cid:173)
`Bridgestone American Holdings, Inc.,
`streamlined patent system that will
`ator CARDIN attempted to offer ger(cid:173)
`Bristol-Myers SQuibb,
`the California
`improve patent Quality and limit un(cid:173)
`mane a mendments, and I regret tha t
`Healthcare Institut e, the Colorado Bio(cid:173)
`necessary and counterproductive liti(cid:173)
`these were block ed.
`Science Association, Cummins, The
`I thank our ranking Republican on
`gation costs, while making sure no par(cid:173)
`Dow Chem ical Company, DuPont, East(cid:173)
`the committee and the comanager of
`ty's access to court is denied.
`man Chemical Company, ExxonMobil,
`The America. Invents Act is the prod(cid:173)
`this measure, Senator GRASSLEY, and
`Genentech , Genzyme, GlaxoSmith(cid:173)
`uct of eight Senate hearings over the
`his staff, Kolan Davis and Rita L ari,
`Kline, the Healthcare Institute of New
`last three Congresses. Our bill is the
`for their dedication to this effort. I
`J ersey, Henkel Corporation, Roffman(cid:173)
`product of years of work and com(cid:173)
`commend Senator HATCH for sticking
`LaRoche, lllinois Tool Works, Inter(cid:173)
`promise. The Senate Judiciary Com(cid:173)
`with it for these many years, and Sen(cid:173)
`national Game Technology, Kodak,
`mittee has reported patent reform leg(cid:173)
`ator KYL for helping get this done.
`Co.,
`Inc.,
`Mecltronic, Merck &
`I also extend my personal thanks, as
`islation to the Senate in each of the
`Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Milliken
`well, to Senator KLOBUCHAR of Min(cid:173)
`last three Cong resses, this year, unani(cid:173)
`and Company, Northrop Grumman,
`nesota who was active during com(cid:173)
`mously. And the House has seen efforts
`Novartis, PepsiCo., Inc., Pfizer, Procter
`mittee con sideration and helped man(cid:173)
`over the same period led by Congress(cid:173)
`& Gamble,
`SanDisk Corporation,
`age this legislatior_ effort in the Sen(cid:173)
`men LAMAR SMITH of Texas and How(cid:173)
`Sangamo BioSciences,
`Inc., United
`ate. She has been outstanding.
`ARD BERMAN of California. The legisla (cid:173)
`Technologies, USG Corporation, the
`The Senate's action today could not
`t ion we are acting on today, in fact, is
`Virginia Biotechnology Association,
`have been accomplished without the
`structured on the original House bill
`Weyerhaeuser, the American Institute
`hard work of many dedicated staffers. I
`and contains many of the original pro(cid:173)
`for CPAs, t he American Institu te of
`would like to thank in particular the
`visions.
`Certified Public Accountants, the Tax
`steadfast work of Aaron Cooper of my
`From the beginning, we recognized
`J ustice Network USA, the New Rules
`Judiciary Committee staff. Aaron h a s
`the need for a more effective and effi(cid:173)
`for Global Finance, the American Col(cid:173)
`spent countless hom·s in meetings and
`cient patent system, one that improves
`lege of Tax Counsel, Consumer Action,
`briefings, with Members, other staff ,
`patent quality and provides incentives
`The American College of Trust and Es(cid:173)
`and interested part ies, working to help
`for entrepreneurs to create jobs. A bal(cid:173)
`tate Counsel, the Partnership for Phil(cid:173)
`me ensure that the America Invents
`anced and effi cient intellectual prop(cid:173)
`anthropic Planning, Global Financial
`Act preserved the m eaningful reforms
`erty system that rewards invention
`Integrity, the International Associa(cid:173)
`we have been working toward since
`and promotes innovation through high
`tion for Registered F inancial Consult(cid:173)
`2005. I would a lso like to thank Eel
`Quality patents is crucial to our Na(cid:173)
`ants, the National Association of En(cid:173)
`Pagano, my chief of staff, and Bruce
`job
`t ion's economic prosperity an.d
`rolled Agents, USPIRG, the Certified
`Cohen, my chief counsel, who have
`growth. That is how we win the fu(cid:173)
`Financial Planner Board of Standards,
`worked on this issue since the start, a s
`ture-by unleashing the American in(cid:173)
`the Financial Planning Association,
`well as Susan Davies who served as my
`ventive spirit . This bill, the America
`the American Association of Attorney(cid:173)
`chief Intellectual Property counsel
`Invents Act, will allow our inventors
`Certified Public Accountants, the Citi(cid:173)
`through the format ive stages of this
`and innovators to nourish.
`zens for Tax Justice, the National
`It is important to our country's con(cid:173)
`legislative effort. Erica Chabot, Curtis
`Treasury Employees Union, the Inde(cid:173)
`tinued economic recovery, and to our
`LeGeyt and Scott Wilson of my Judici(cid:173)
`pendent Community Bankers of Amer(cid:173)
`successfully competing in th e global
`ary Committee staff also deserve
`ica, and numerous other organizations
`economy. America needs a 21st century
`thanks for their committed work on
`a nd companies representing all sectors
`patent syst em to lead. The last exten(cid:173)
`this legislation.
`of the patent community that have
`I also commend the hardworking
`sive reform of our patent system was
`been urging action on patent reform
`Senate nom· staff, Tim Mitchell an.d
`nearly 60 years ago. It is time.
`proposals for years.
`While the Congress debates spending
`Trish Engle, as well as Dave Schiappa,
`The America Invents Act will accom(cid:173)
`and budget measures in an often too
`and the s.taffs of other Senators, in(cid:173)
`plish 3 important goals, which have
`partisan manner, the American people
`cluding Tim Molino, Joe Matal, and
`been at the center of the patent reform
`are craving- and the American econ(cid:173)
`Matt Sandgren, for their dedicated eif(cid:173)
`debate from the beginning: It will im(cid:173)
`omy is demanding- bipartisan legisla-
`forts.
`prove and harmonize operations at the
`
`Ocean Tomo Ex. 1009-002
`
`

`
`81362
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE
`March 8, 2011
`PTO; it will improve the quality of pat(cid:173)
`ventors, for our consumers. Wot•king
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`ents that are issued; and it will provide
`together, we can smooth the path for
`objection, it is so ordered.
`more
`interesting-and great-Amer(cid:173)
`more certainty in litigation. In par(cid:173)
`Mr. REID. Mr. President, wi th this
`ican inventions. That is what this bi(cid:173)
`t icular, the legislation will move this
`agreement, I ask unanimous consent
`partisan, comprehensive patent reform
`Nation's patent system to a first-in(cid:173)
`that the clotur e vote with respect to
`bill will do. No one claims that ours iis
`ventor-to-file system, make important
`the motion to proceed to H.R. 1 be vit i(cid:173)
`a perfect bill. It is a compromise that
`quality enhancement mechanisms, and
`ated.
`will make key improvements in the
`provide the PTO with the resources it
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`patent system. Having coordinated
`needs to work through its backlog by
`objection, it is so ordered.
`with the leaders in the House through
`providing it with fee setting authority,
`Mr. REID. Mr. President, even
`this process, I hope that the House will
`subject to oversight. The America In(cid:173)
`though there have been a few turns in
`look favorably on our work and adopt
`vents Act provides the tools the PTO
`the road, we are at the place where we
`this measure so that it can be sent to
`needs to separate the inventive wheat
`need to be. We need to be able to show
`the President without delay and i ts im(cid:173)
`from the chaff, which will help business
`the American people where we are on
`provements can take effect in order to
`bring new products to market and cre(cid:173)
`these two measures. I express my ap(cid:173)
`encourage American innovation and
`ate jobs.
`preciation to my friend, the Republican
`promote American invention.
`Innovation has always been at the
`leader. As I said, things don't always
`I suggest the absence of a quorum.
`heart of Amer ica and American suc(cid:173)
`work smoothly around here, but they
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
`cess. From the founding of our Nation,
`usually wot'k. Now we are at a point
`clerk will call the roll.
`we recognized the importance of pro(cid:173)
`where we can vote on these two meas(cid:173)
`The assi stant bill clerk proceeded to
`moting and protecting innovation, and
`ures which is what we need to do.
`call the roll.
`so the Constitution explicitly grants
`Mr. REID. I ask unanimous consent
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under
`Congress the power to "promote the
`that the order for the quorum call be
`the previous order, amendment No. 152
`progress and science and useful ar ts, by
`rescinded.
`is withdrawn.
`securing for limited times to .. . in(cid:173)
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`Under the previous order, amend(cid:173)
`ventors the exclusive right to their re(cid:173)
`objection, it is so ordet•ed.
`ment No. 143
`is modified with the
`spective . .. discoveries." The patent
`Mr . REID. Mr. President, I ask unan(cid:173)
`changes at the desk.
`system plays a key role in encouraging
`imous consent the Reid amendment
`The amendment, as modified, is as
`innovation and bringing new products
`No. 152 be withdrawn; that the Reid
`follows:
`to market. The discoveries made by
`amendment No. 143 be modified with
`(Purpose: To include public institutions of
`American inventors and research insti(cid:173)
`the changes at the desk; the Senate
`higher education in the definition of a
`tutions, commercialized by our compa(cid:173)
`proceed to vote on the amendment, as
`micro entity)
`nies, and protected and prom oted by
`modified, with no amendments in order
`On page 93, before line 18, insert the fol(cid:173)
`our patent laws have made our system
`prior to the vote; that there then be 30
`lowing:
`the envy of the world.
`m inutes of debate equally divided be(cid:173)
`"(d) STATE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDU(cid:173)
`High quality patents are the key to
`tween the two managers or thei r des(cid:173)
`CATION.-
`our economic growth. They benefit
`ignees; that S. 23 be read a third t ime;
`"(1) IN C:ENERAL.-For purposes of this sec(cid:173)
`both patent owners and users who can
`that a budgetary pay-go statement be
`tion, a mict·o entity shall include an appli(cid:173)
`be more confident in the validity of
`read; the Senate then proceed to a vote
`cant who certifies that-
`issued patents .. Patents of low quality
`on passage of the b~ll. as amended; and
`"(A) the applicant's employer, from which
`and dubious validity, by contrast, en(cid:173)
`the applicant obtains the majority of the ap(cid:173)
`the motions to reconsider be consid(cid:173)
`able patent trolls who extort unreason(cid:173)
`plicant's income, is a State public institu(cid:173)
`ered m ade and la.id upon the table w.itl1
`tion of higher education, as defined in sec(cid:173)
`able licensing fees from legitimate
`no intervening action or debate.
`tion 102 of the Higher Education Act ·Of 1965
`businesses, and constit ute a drag on in(cid:173)
`Further, I ask unanimous consen t
`(20 U.S.C. 1002); or
`novation. Too many dubious patents
`that at 12 noon Wednesday, March 9,
`"(B) the applicant has assigned, granted,
`a lso unjustly cast doubt on truly high
`the Senate proceed to the consider(cid:173)
`conveyed, or is under an obligation by con(cid:173)
`quality patents.
`ation of Calendar No. 14, H.R. 1, the De(cid:173)
`tract or law to assign, grant, or convey, a li(cid:173)
`After 6 years of debate and discus(cid:173)
`fense appropriations long-term con(cid:173)
`cense or other ownership interest in the par(cid:173)
`sion, more than a dozen hearings and
`tinuing resolution for fiscal year 2011;
`ticular application to such State public in(cid:173)
`mat·k up sessions, and countless hours
`stitution.
`that there be 3 hours of debate on H.R.
`of member and staff meetings with two
`"(2) DIRECTOR'S AUTHORITY.- The Director
`1 and the Democratic alternative, the
`presidential administrations and inter(cid:173)
`may, in the Director's d iscretion, impose in(cid:173)
`Inouye substitute amendment No. 149,
`come limi ts, annual fi ling limits, or other
`ested parties across the spectrum, the
`with the time equally divided between
`limits on who may qualify as a micro entity
`Senate is finally acting to make the
`the two leaders or their designees prior
`pursuant to this subsection if the Director
`first meaningful, comprehensive re(cid:173)
`to a vote on passage of H.R . 1; that the
`determines that such additional limits are
`forms to the n ation's patent system in
`vote on passage be subject to a 60-vote
`reasonably necessary to avoid an undue im(cid:173)
`nearly 60 years. The Senate debate has
`threshold; that if the bill achieves 60
`pact on other patent applicants or owners o•·
`now extended for more than a week.
`affirmative votes, the bill be read a
`are otherwise reasonably necessary a:nd ap(cid:173)
`propriate. At least 3 months before any lim(cid:173)
`Passage of the America Invents Act
`third time and passed; that if the bill
`its proposed to be imposed pursuant to this
`demonstrates what we can accomplish
`does not achieve 60 affirmative votes,
`paragraph shall take effect, the Director
`when we cast aside partisan rhetoric,
`the majority leader be recognized to
`shall inform the Committee on the Judiciary
`and focus on working together for the
`offer the Inouye substitute amendment
`of the House of Representatives and the
`American people and for our futur e .
`No. 149; the Senate then proceed to a
`Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate of
`It has been almost 6 years since
`vote on
`the substitute amendment;
`any such proposed limits.".
`Chairman SMITH and Congressman
`that the substitute amendment be sub(cid:173)
`The PRESID ING OFFICER. The
`BERMAN introduced the first version of
`ject to a 60-vote threshold; if the sub(cid:173)
`question is on agreeing to amendment
`patent reform legislation in 2005, but
`stitute amendment achieves 60 affirma(cid:173)
`No. 143, as modified.
`the structure and guiding principles of
`tive votes, the substitute amendment
`The amendment (No. 143), as modi(cid:173)
`the legislation remain the same. The
`be agreed to; the bill, as amended, be
`fied, was agreed to.
`bill will speed the process by which the
`read a third time and passed; if the
`Mr. COBURN. I wish to express my
`Patent Office considers applications
`substitute amendment does not achieve
`opposition to Reid amendment No. 143,
`and should improve the quality of pat(cid:173)
`60 affirmative votes, H.R. 1 be returned
`as modified. I do not believe public in(cid:173)
`to the calendar; that no motions or
`ents it issues.
`Innovation and economic develop(cid:173)
`stitutions of higher education, or any
`amendments be in order to the sub(cid:173)
`ment are not uniquely Democratic or
`entity, should be carved out of the defi(cid:173)
`stitute amendment or to the bill prior
`Republican objectives, so we worked
`to the votes; furtt.er, that all of the
`nition of micro entity in the under(cid:173)
`together to find the proper balance for
`above occur with no intervening action
`lying legislation. Had a rollcall vote
`America- for out· economy, for our in-
`or debate.
`occurred, I would have voted no.
`
`Ocean Tomo Ex. 1009-003
`
`

`
`81363
`CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE
`March 8, 2011
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I suggest
`Mr. LEAHY. That is correct. The pro(cid:173)
`ods of conducting business, unlike in(cid:173)
`the absence of a quorum, with unani(cid:173)
`ceeding has a high er threshold than
`formation about other patents, is often
`mous consen t that the time be equally
`current r eexamination before the PTO
`not documented in paten ts or published
`divided.
`will even undertake a review of the
`in journals. This means a pat ent exam(cid:173)
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`iner has significantly less opportunity
`paten t. So as a practical matter, a pat(cid:173)
`objection , i t is so ordered.
`ent without any serious challenge to
`than he might with a traditional pat(cid:173)
`ent to weed ou t undeserving ap,plica(cid:173)
`'!'he c l erk w ill call t.he roll.
`its validity would never be subject to a
`The assistant bill clerk proceeded to
`proceeding.
`tions. Unfortunately, that means the
`call the roll.
`Mr. PRYOR. Would the Senator agree
`burden falls on private individuals and
`Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I ask
`that in a case in which the validity of
`an expensive court process to clean up
`unanimous consent that the order for
`the patent has been upheld by a dis(cid:173)
`the mess.
`the quorum call be rescinded.
`trict court but the case remains on ap(cid:173)
`The ability to easily obtain business
`The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without
`peal, that this amendment would likely
`method patents without a r igorou s and
`objection, it is so ordered.
`not affect the pendin g appeal?
`thorough review in the Patent Office
`Mr. LEAHY. I would. The patent may
`has created a flood of poor quality
`CHECK 21 ACT PA'l'€NT S
`Mr. PRYOR. I would like to clarify
`still be subject to t h e proceeding, but
`business method patents and a cottage
`some concerns I have about the Schu(cid:173)
`since the court did not hold the patent
`industry of business method patent
`mer-Kyl program that was included in
`invalid or unforceable, it would not
`litigation. The Federal courts have rec(cid:173)
`the managers' amendment
`to
`the
`likely have an effect on the pending ap(cid:173)
`ognized this problem, and indeed even
`peal.
`America
`Invents Act, adopted on
`the Supreme Court has begun to ad(cid:173)
`Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I want
`March 1. I am specifically concerned
`dress it. In KSR Intl Co. v. Teleflex,
`to take the opport unity to explain fur(cid:173)
`that this provision revives an amend(cid:173)
`Inc. and Bilski v. Kappas, the Court ar(cid:173)
`ther a few elements of the Schumer(cid:173)
`ment that had been included in pre(cid:173)
`t iculated a new standard for obvious(cid:173)
`Kyl provision in the patent bill. The
`vious versions of the bill- that amend(cid:173)
`ness and made clear that abstract busi(cid:173)
`Transitional Program
`for business
`ment specifically targeted patents re(cid:173)
`ness methods are not patentable . While
`method paten ts addresses a cri tical
`lated to the Check 21 Act and elimi(cid:173)
`these legal developments are impor(cid:173)
`problem in the patent world, and i t is
`nated the ability of the holder of such
`tant, the leave in limbo the many pat(cid:173)
`crucial that it be administered and im(cid:173)
`patents to coll.ect damages. Is that the
`ents that were issued by the PTO since
`plemented appropriately by both the
`purpose of the Schumer-Kyl language?
`State Street that are not in fact valid.
`Mr LEAHY. No, the amendment is
`Patent and Trademark Office and the
`Litigation over
`invalid patents
`entirely different from the 2008 amend(cid:173)
`courts.
`places a substantial burden on U.S.
`Business method patents are the
`ment related to patents that place on
`courts and the U.S. economy. Business(cid:173)
`bane of the patent world. The business
`tax on implementation of the Check 21
`method inventions generally are not
`method problem began in 1998 with the
`Act. The Schumer-Kyl program ad(cid:173)
`and have not been patentable in coun(cid:173)
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
`dresses certain business method pat(cid:173)
`tries other than the United States. In
`Circuit decision in State Street Bank &
`ents and does not target any specific
`order to reduce the burden placed on
`Trust Co. v. S~gnature F inancial
`patents. The Schumer-Kyl program is
`courts and the economy by this back(cid:173)
`Group, Inc. State Street created a sea(cid:173)
`intended to provide a cost-effective al(cid:173)
`and-forth shift in judic ia l precedent,
`change in the patentability of business(cid:173)
`ternative to litigation to examine busi(cid:173)
`the Schumer-Kyl
`transitional pro(cid:173)
`methods, holding that any invention
`ness-method patents.
`ceeding authori zes a temporary admin(cid:173)
`can be patented so long as it produces
`Mr. PRYOR. Am I correct then that
`istrative alternative
`for
`reviewing
`a " useful , concrete, and tangible re(cid:173)
`the Schumer-Kyl program is s imply
`business method patents.
`trying to address the problem of busi(cid:173)
`sult" and meets other requirements of
`It is important to clarify two ele(cid:173)
`the patent laws.
`ness method patents of dubious valid(