throbber
Case 6:13-cv-00447-JRG Document 484 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26227
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`§§§
`
` CASE NO. 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM



`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CASE NO. 6:13cv448-JRG-KNM
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§§ §§§§
`
`§§
`
`§§§§§
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC, et al.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 266; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 320) and the
`
`Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 423; 6:13CV448; Doc. No.
`
`454) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the
`
`Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment
`
`Regarding Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 457; 6:13CV448, Doc.
`
`No. 477), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and
`
`Recommendation as to which objection was made, the Court finds no error therein.
`
`Defendants assert that the Court’s claim construction that not all asserted claims require
`
`“logically separate” memories for certain types of data directly contradicts the Court’s reliance on
`Smartflash - Exhibit 2050
`Google v. Smartflash
`CBM2015-00143
`
`

`
`Case 6:13-cv-00447-JRG Document 484 Filed 02/13/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 26228
`
`the patents’ recitations of distinct memory types. However, in ruling on the instant motion, the
`
`Court recognized that the patents recite several different memory types throughout the claims—as
`
`opposed to simply generic computer memory. This is one element among the combination of
`
`limitations that provides an inventive concept. Recognizing that the claims do more than recite
`
`generic computer memory does not contradict a finding that some claims require “logically
`
`separate” storage of certain data types.
`
`The Court hereby adopts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity
`
`Pursuant to § 101 (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 266; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 320) are DENIED.
`
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket