throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case CBM2015-00131
`Patent 8,061,598 B2
`___________
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`The Patent Owner and Petitioner provide notice to the Board that they have
`
`
`
`stipulated to extend Due Dates 1 and 2 as follows:
`
`Due Date 1 is extended from February 12, 2016 to February 17, 2016.
`
`Due Date 2 is extended from April 21, 2016 to April 26, 2016.
`
`Due Dates 3-7 in the 11/16/2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 9) remain
`
`unchanged.
`
`The revisions for Due Date 1 and Due Date 2 are shown in the attached
`
`annotated Appendix.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 10, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`/ Michael R. Casey /
`
`Michael R. Casey
`Registration No. 40,294
`Davidson Berquist Jackson &
`Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr., Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: (571) 765-7700
`Fax : (571) 765-7200
`Email: mcasey@dbjg.com
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL................................................Upon Request
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 17, 1016
`DUE DATE 1...............................................................................February 12, 2016
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`April 26, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 2.............................................................................. April 21, 2016
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`DUE DATE 3............................................................................... May 23, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................. June 13, 2016
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`Request for oral argument
`DUE DATE 5 .............................................................................. June 27, 2016
`
`Response to observation
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................ July 5, 2016
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................ July 18, 2016
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this JOINT STIPULATION TO
`
`MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER was served, by agreement of the parties, by
`
`email on February 10, 2016, to the following addresses:
`
`Dated: February 10, 2016
`
`J. Steven Baughman (steven.baughman@ropesgray.com)
`Ching-Lee Fukuda (ching-lee.fukuda@ropesgray.com)
`Megan Raymond (megan.raymond@ropesgray.com
`ApplePTABService-SmartFlash@ropesgray.com
`
`
`/ Michael R. Casey /
`Michael R. Casey
`Registration No. 40,294
`Davidson Berquist Jackson &
`Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr., Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: (571) 765-7700
`Fax : (571) 765-7200
`Email: mcasey@dbjg.com
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket