throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case CBM2015-00129
`
`Patent 7,942,317 B2
`
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DUE DATE 2
`
`01980-00035/7888017.1
`
`

`
`
`
`The Petitioner and Patent Owner provide notice to the Board that they have
`
`stipulated to extend Due Date 2 as follows:
`
`Due Date 2 is extended from April 20, 2016 to May 6, 2016.
`
`Due Dates 3–7 in the 11/23/2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 9) remain
`
`unchanged.
`
`The revision for Due Date 2 is shown in the attached annotated Appendix.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`01980-00035/7888017.1
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Andrew M. Holmes/
`
`Andrew M. Holmes (Reg. No. 64,718)
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`Melissa J. Baily
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-875-6000
`Fax: 415-875-6700
`
`Raymond N. Nimrod (Reg. No. 31,987)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone: 202-849-7100
`Fax: 212-849-7100
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Google Inc.
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Appendix
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE CALL ................................................ Upon request
`
`DUE DATE 1 ........................................................................ February 8, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ....................................................... April 20, 2016 May 6, 2016
`
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................. May 20, 2016
`
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................. June 10, 2016
`
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. June 24, 2016
`
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ................................................................................ July 1, 2016
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 .............................................................................. July 18, 2016
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`01980-00035/7888017.1
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 19, 2016 I served the foregoing motion and
`
`/Adam Botzenhart/
`Adam Botzenhart
`
`4
`
`attached declaration by email to:
`
`SmartFlash-CBM@dbjg.com
`Michael R. Casey (mcasey@dbjg.com)
`J. Scott Davidson (jsd@dbjg.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 19, 2016
`
`
`01980-00035/7888017.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket