throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC. and GOOGLE INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case CBM2015-00125
`Case CBM2015-00028
`Case CBM2015-000291
`Patent No. 7,334,720 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MELISSA J. BAILY
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, and as authorized in the Board’s Notice of
`
`Filing Date Accorded to Petition (Paper 5), Petitioner Google Inc. (“Google”)
`
`respectfully requests pro hac vice admission of Melissa J. Baily as counsel in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`1 Google challenged claims 1 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,334,720 in
`CBM2015-00125. Google’s challenge to claim 1 was consolidated with
`CBM2015-00028. CBM2015-00125, Pap. 11. Google’s challenge to claim 15 was
`consolidated with CBM2015-00029. Id. Identical motions for pro hac vice
`admission and supporting declarations are being filed in CBM2015-00125,
`CBM2015-00028, and CBM2015-00029.
`
`01980-00035/6844296.2
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`I.
`
`TIME FOR FILING
`
`This motion is timely because it is being filed no sooner than twenty-one
`
`(21) days after service of Google’s Petition in its proceeding, which occurred on
`
`May 6, 2015.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`The facts stated below and the affidavit of Melissa J. Baily filed
`
`concurrently herewith demonstrate good cause for the Board to recognize Ms.
`
`Baily as pro hac vice counsel in this proceeding.
`
`Ms. Baily is an experienced litigation attorney and has been practicing law
`
`since 2001. Her practice focuses on intellectual property litigation, and she has
`
`litigated patent infringement cases in district courts throughout the country.
`
`Among her experience in patent litigation matters, Ms. Baily has participated in all
`
`stages of district court proceedings, including Markman hearings, trials, and other
`
`patent-related hearings and proceedings concerning patent validity and
`
`infringement issues. Ms. Baily is widely recognized as a leading patent litigator,
`
`including being named among the top intellectual property lawyers in the country
`
`under the age of 40 by Law360 in 2014.
`
`Ms. Baily has experience and is familiar with U.S. Patent No. 7,334,720
`
`(“the ’720 patent”) and the issues involved in this proceeding. She is counsel for
`
`Google in currently stayed district court proceedings where Smartflash accuses
`
`01980-00035/6844296.2
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`Google of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,334,720; 7,942,317; 8,033,458;
`
`8,061,598; 8,336,772; and 8,794,516. (Smartflash LLC v. Google Inc., E.D. Tex.
`
`No. 6:14-cv-435.) She also represents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc., HTC Corporation, and HTC America, Inc. in currently
`
`stayed district court litigation where Smartflash asserts infringement of U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 7,334,720; 7,942,317; 8,033,458; 8,061,598; and 8,336,772. (Smartflash LLC
`
`v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., et al., E.D. Tex. No. 6:13-cv-448.) As counsel in
`
`those district court proceedings, Ms. Baily has been involved in all aspects of the
`
`defense, including with respect to issues regarding the invalidity of the ’720 patent.
`
`In light of Ms. Baily’s experience and familiarity with the ’720 patent,
`
`Google prefers that Ms. Baily participate as counsel in this proceeding as well.
`
`Furthermore, Smartflash and Apple do not oppose Ms. Baily’s admission as pro
`
`hac vice counsel.
`
`***
`
`For the reasons outlined in this motion and in the accompanying declaration,
`
`Google respectfully requests admission of Melissa J. Baily as pro hac vice counsel.
`
`
`
`01980-00035/6844296.2
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Raymond N. Nimrod/
`
`Raymond N. Nimrod (Reg. No. 31,987)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone: 202-849-7100
`Fax: 212-849-7100
`
`Charles K. Verhoeven
`Melissa J. Baily
`Andrew M. Holmes (Reg. No. 64,718)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-875-6000
`Fax: 415-875-6700
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Google Inc.
`
`01980-00035/6844296.2
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on December 23, 2015 I served the foregoing motion
`
`and attached declaration by email to:
`
`SmartFlash-CBM@dbjg.com
`Michael R. Casey (mcasey@dbjg.com)
`J. Scott Davidson (jsd@dbjg.com)
`J. Steven Baughman (steven.baughman@ropesgray.com)
`Ching-Lee Fukuda (ching-lee.fukuda@ropesgray.com)
`Megan Raymond (megan.raymond@ropesgray.com)
`ApplePTABService-SmartFlash@ropesgray.com
`
`/Adam Botzenhart/
`Adam Botzenhart
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`01980-00035/6844296.2
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket