`
`PATENT OWNER
`EXHIBIT 2022
`
`EXHIBIT 2022
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`oPAp
`
`DEC 16 it‘il
`'a>
`
`rrApe-mr& (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Serial No.: (cid:9)
`
`11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Confirmation No.: (cid:9)
`
`7098
`
`Applicant(s): McNally, et al. (cid:9)
`
`Group Art Unit: (cid:9)
`
`2191
`
`Filed: (cid:9)
`
`April 22, 2005 (cid:9)
`
`Examiner: (cid:9)
`
`Brophy, Matthew
`
`For:
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATIONS
`SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION, AND HANDWRITING AND VOICE
`MODIFICATION OF ORDERS
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE AND AMENDMENT OF CLAIMS
`
`Mail Stop Amendment
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`Applicants sincerely thank the Examiner, and also Wei Zhen and Gail Hayes of the
`
`USPTO, for the very productive interview on November 16, 2010. This Supplemental Response
`
`and Amendment of Claims responds to the discussion of that interview, as summarized in the
`
`Interview Summary of December 7, 2010.
`
`Please amend the above-identified application as follows:
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims which begins on page 2
`
`of this paper; and
`
`Remarks begin on page 12 of this paper.
`
`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application. By the present amendment, Claims 109-114 are cancelled. Claims 103-108, 115-
`
`(cid:9)
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`122, 124-125 and 127 are amended. Claims 103-108 and 115-127 are now pending in the
`
`application. No new matter has been added by the present amendment.
`
`1-102. (Cancelled).
`
`103. (Currently Amended) An information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system for configuring and transmitting hospitality menus comprising:
`
`a. a central processing unit,
`
`b. a data storage device connected to said central processing unit,
`
`c. an operating system including a first graphical user interface,
`
`d. a master menu including at least menu categories, menu items and modifiers, wherein
`
`said master menu is capable of being stored on said data storage device pursuant to a master
`
`menu file structure and said master menu is capable of being configured for display to facilitate
`
`user operations in at least one window of said first graphical user interface as cascaded sets of
`
`linked graphical user interface screens, and
`
`e. menu configuration software enabled to generate a programmed handheld menu
`
`configuration from said master menu for wireless transmission to and programmed for display on
`
`a wireless handheld computing device, said programmed handheld menu configuration
`
`comprising at least menu categories, menu items and modifiers and wherein the menu
`
`configuration software is enabled to generate said programmed handheld menu configuration by
`
`utilizing parameters from the master menu file structure defining at least the menu categories,
`
`menu items and modifiers of the master menu such that at least the menu categories, menu items
`
`and modifiers comprising the programmed handheld menu configuration are synchronized in real
`
`time with analogous information comprising the master menu,
`
`2
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`wherein the menu configuration software is further enabled to generate the programmed
`
`handheld menu configuration in conformity with display screen parameters unique to the
`
`wireless handheld computing device to facilitate user operations with and display of the
`
`programmed handheld menu configuration on the display screen of a handheld graphical user
`
`interface integral with the wireless handheld computing device, wherein said display screen
`
`parameters comprise at least the displayable size of the handheld graphical user interface
`
`wherein the programmed handheld menu configuration is configured by the menu configuration
`
`software for display as programmed cascaded sets of linked graphical user interface screens
`
`appropriate for the display screen parameters of the wireless handheld computing device,
`
`wherein said programmed cascaded sets of linked graphical user interface screens for display of
`
`the handheld menu configuration are configured differently from the cascaded sets of linked
`
`graphical user interface screens for display of the master menu on said first graphical user
`
`interface, and
`
`wherein the system is enabled for real time synchronous communications to and from the
`
`wireless handheld computing device utilizing the programmed handheld menu configuration
`
`including the capability of real time synchronous transmission of the programmed handheld
`
`menu configuration to the wireless handheld computing device and real time synchronous
`
`transmissions of selections made from the handheld menu configuration on the wireless handheld
`
`computing device-and
`
`;7. • : (cid:9)
`
`• (cid:9) . (cid:9)
`
`•"
`
`3
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`104. (Currently Amended) The information management and synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with claim 103, wherein
`
`a÷en-line-repefts
`
`b+en-line-eeer-dinatien, the system is further enabled by a communications systemic
`
`relationship providing a common, linked system comprising:
`
`a) A Wireless Hub Application;
`
`b) A Web Hub Application;
`
`c) Linked Databases between two or more different Hospitality Applications; and .
`
`d) A Communications Setup Application.
`
`105. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with claim 103, or 101., wherein the information from the
`
`POS database is automatically imported into the system.
`
`106. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with (cid:9)
`
`laim 103, wherein the said
`
`Hospitality Applications include at least
`
`- (cid:9)
`
`•
`
`. -
`
`e) Reservations applications.
`
`4
`
`(cid:9)
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`107. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with any of claims 103 105claim 103, wherein the said
`
`Hospitality Applications include at least
`
`•
`
`b) Point of sale applications; and
`
`e) Ticketing applications.
`
`108. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with any of claims 103 or 105, or 106, or 107claim 103,
`
`further enabled to automatically format the programmed handheld menu configuration for
`
`display as cascaded sets of linked graphical user interface screens appropriate for the display
`
`parameters of at least two different wireless handheld computing device display sizes in the same
`
`connected system.
`
`109. (Cancelled)
`
`110. (Cancelled)
`
`111. (Cancelled).
`
`112. (Cancelled)
`
`113.(Cancelled)
`
`114. (Cancelled)
`
`115. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with any of claims 103 111-claim 103 in which the
`
`wireless handheld computing device is a smart phone.
`
`116. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`5
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`communications system in accordance with
`
`laim 103, further enabled to
`
`facilitate and complete payment processing directly from the wireless handheld computing
`
`device including:
`
`a) Billing;
`
`b) Status; and
`
`c) Payment Information.
`
`117. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with any of claims 103 116 claim 103, wherein one or
`
`more of the layout, views or fonts of the programmed handheld menu configuration are created
`
`in conformity with the display screen parameters of the wireless handheld computing device and
`
`wherein the system is enabled to generate a view of the programmed handheld menu
`
`configuration for user preview from the central computing unit and which facilitates a further
`
`user manual modification prior to the transmissions of the programmed handheld menu
`
`configuration to the wireless handheld computing device. -
`
`118. (Currently Amended) An information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system for configuring and transmitting hospitality menus comprising:
`
`a) a central processing unit;
`
`b) a data storage device connected to said central processing unit;
`
`c) an operating system including a first graphical user interface, said operating system
`
`configured to interoperate with the central processing unit, the data storage device and
`
`application software;
`
`d) a master menu including menu categories and menu items, wherein said master menu
`
`6-
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`is capable of being stored on said data storage device pursuant to a master menu file structure
`
`and said master menu is capable of being configured for display to facilitate user operations in at
`
`least one window of said first graphical user interface as cascaded sets of linked graphical user
`
`interface screens; and
`
`e) a modifier menu capable of being stored on said data storage device, and menu
`
`configuration software enabled to automatically generate a programmed handheld menu
`
`configuration from said master menu for display on a wireless handheld computing device, said
`
`programmed handheld menu configuration comprising at least menu categories, menu items and
`
`modifiers and wherein the menu configuration software is enabled to generate said programmed
`
`handheld menu configuration by utilizing parameters from the master menu file structure
`
`defining at least the categories and items of the master menu and modifiers from the modifier
`
`menu at least the menu categories, menu items and modifiers comprising the programmed
`
`handheld menu configuration are synchronized in real time with analogous information
`
`comprising the master and modifier menus wherein the menu configuration software is further
`
`enabled to generate the programmed handheld menu configuration in conformity with display
`
`screen parameters unique to the wireless handheld computing device to facilitate user operations
`
`with and display of the programmed handheld menu configuration on the display screen of a
`
`handheld graphical user interface integral with the wireless handheld computing device, wherein
`
`said display screen parameters comprise at least the displayable size of the handheld graphical
`
`user interface,
`
`wherein the programmed handheld menu configuration is configured by the menu
`
`configuration software for display as cascaded sets of linked graphical user interface screens
`
`7
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`appropriate for the display screen parameters of the wireless handheld computing device,
`
`wherein said cascaded sets of linked graphical user interface screens for display of the
`
`programmed handheld menu configuration are configured differently from the cascaded sets of
`
`related graphical user interface screens for display of the master menu on said first graphical user
`
`interface, and
`
`wherein the system is enabled for real time synchronous communications to and from the
`
`wireless handheld computing device utilizing the programmed handheld menu configuration
`
`including the capability of real time synchronous transmission of at least the menu categories,
`
`menu items and modifiers comprising the programmed handheld menu configuration to the
`
`wireless handheld computing device and real time synchronous transmissions of selections made
`
`from the handheld menu configuration on the wireless handheld computing device and
`
`with-ene-anetheF-and
`
`the-system.
`
`119. The information management and real time synchronous communications system in
`
`accordance with claim 118, further including a communications systemic relationship
`
`comprising:
`
`a) A Wireless Hub Application;
`
`b) A Web Hub Application;
`
`c) Linked Databases Between two or more different Hospitality Applications; and
`
`d) A Communications Setup Application.
`
`-8
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`120. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with claims 118 or 119, further enabled to facilitate and
`
`: - (cid:9)
`
`- - (cid:9)
`
`•
`
`a) Billing;
`
`b) Status; and
`
`e-)-Payfrient-Infefmatien7 claim 118, wherein at least two different hospitality software
`
`applications are integrated between and with one another.
`
`121. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with
`
`claim 118, wherein the system enables automatic
`
`importation of the POS database information into the system.
`
`122. (Currently Amended) An information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system for use with wireless handheld computing devices and the internet
`
`comprising:
`
`a) a master database connected in said system and configured to store hospitality
`
`application information pursuant to a master database file structure;
`
`b) at least one wireless handheld computing device connected in said system and
`
`configured to display said hospitality application information;
`
`c) at least one web server connected in said system and configured to display said
`
`hospitality application information;
`
`d) at least one web page connected in said system and configured to display said
`
`hospitality application information; and
`
`9
`
`(cid:9)
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`e) real time communications control software enabled to link and synchronize hospitality
`
`application information simultaneously between the master database, wireless handheld
`
`computing device, web server and web page,
`
`wherein the communications control software is enabled to utilize parameters from the
`
`master database file structure to synchronize the hospitality application information in real time
`
`between the master database, at least one wireless handheld computing device, at least one web
`
`server and at least one web page such that substantially the same information comprising the
`
`hospitality application inforination is capable of being displayed on the wireless handheld
`
`computing device, at least one web page and other display screens of the synchronized system,
`
`such that the hospitality application information is synchronized between any connected users,
`
`wherein the communications control software is enabled to act as a real time interface
`
`between the elements of the system and any applicable communications protocol,
`
`wherein the communications control software is enabled to automatically and
`
`simultaneously configure the hospitality application information for display on both the wireless
`
`handheld computing device and the web page in conformity with display screen parameters
`
`unique to the wireless handheld computing device or the web page, wherein said display screen
`
`parameters comprise at least the displayable size of the handheld computing device display
`
`screen or the web page, and
`
`wherein the system is enabled for real time synchronous transmission of the configured
`
`hospitality application information to the wireless handheld computing device, the web server
`
`and the web page and real time synchronous transmissions of inputs responding to the configured
`
`hospitality application information from the wireless handheld computing device, or the web
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`server or the web page and
`
`another.
`
`123. The information management and real time synchronous communications system in
`
`accordance with claim 122, further including a communications systemic relationship
`
`comprising:
`
`a) A Wireless Hub Application;
`
`b) A Web Hub Application;
`
`c) Linked Databases Between two or more different Hospitality Applications; and
`
`d) A Communications Setup Application.
`
`124. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system of either claim 122 or claim 123, further enabled to automatically
`
`. (cid:9)
`
`
`
`: (cid:9) .
`
`claim 122, wherein the system is
`
`enabled to automatically import the information from the POS (point of sale) database into the
`
`system.
`
`125. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system of
`
`(cid:9)
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`claim 122, wherein at least two different
`
`hospitality applications are integrated between and with one another.
`
`126. The information management and real time synchronous communications system in
`
`accordance with claim 122 , wherein the hospitality application information also includes the
`
`completion of payment processing.
`
`127. (Currently Amended) The information management and real time synchronous
`
`communications system in accordance with any of claims 122 126 claim 122, wherein the
`
`configured wireless handheld computing device is a smart phone.
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-102 were canceled without prejudice or disclaimer by previous amendments.
`
`Claims 109-114 are cancelled herein. Claims 103-108 and 115-127 are now pending in the
`
`present application.
`
`SUMMARY OF MOST RECENT OFFICE ACTION
`
`In the Office Action dated January 8, 2010, the Examiner rejected pending claims 103-
`
`110 and 115-121 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the Micros Systems Inc. "8700
`
`HMS 2.10 User's Manual" (1997) ("Micros") in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,300,947
`
`("Kanevsky") and further in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,974,238 ("Chase"), and rejected pending
`
`claims 122-127 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Micros in view of U.S. Patent
`
`5,991,739 ("Cupps") and further in view of Kanevsky and Chase. The Office Action was made
`
`final.
`
`-12-
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial NO. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`REQUEST FOR CONTINUED EXAMINATION AND
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`On May 24, 2010, Applicants filed a Request for Continued Examination, and addressed
`
`issues raised by the Examiner in the January 2010 Office Action as well as amending the
`
`pending claims. Applicants also filed an Information Disclosure Statement on October 1, 2010.
`
`EXAMINER INTERVIEW OF NOVEMBER 16, 2010
`
`On November 16, 2010, a telephonic interview was held regarding this application.
`
`USPTO participants were Matthew Brophy, Wei Zhen, and Gail Hayes. Applicants' participants
`
`were inventor Keith McNally and attorney Michael Fabiano.
`
`During the interview, the secondary considerations presented by Applicants in the
`
`submitted (but not yet considered) section 1.132 declarations were discussed. Applicants stated
`
`that the evidence presented represents both the "long felt need" and "commercial success"
`
`secondary factors as evidence of non-obviousness, and cited, among other evidence, a 1999
`
`Food.com internal email message discussing the licensing of Applicants' technology, as well as
`
`g _.-. '4 (cid:9)
`
`Is (cid:9)
`
`1 (cid:9)
`
`II 4./
`
`rosoft founder Bill Gates that recognized the
`
`innovativeness of Applicants' technology. USPTO participants expressed concerns as to
`
`whether the evidence of secondary considerations had a sufficient nexus to the scope of the
`
`pending claims.
`
`The USPTO participants requested the following items, in a supplemental response to be
`
`filed within four weeks:
`
`(1) Additional evidence, and further clarity, regarding the scope of the evidence of
`
`secondary considerations vis-à-vis the scope of the pending claims, and the nexus between the
`
`-13-
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`evidence presented and the claims in the pending application;
`
`(2) The subject matter, if any, of the pending application that is not entitled to the priority
`
`date of the parent application that matured into U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850.
`
`(3) Addressing whether pending dependent claims were improper multiple dependent
`
`claims.
`
`H. SUMMARY OF APPLICANTS' RESPONSE
`
`Applicants respectfully submit significantly revised claims in response to the prior
`
`outstanding Office Action as well as suggestions made by the Examiners in Interviews.
`
`In response to Examiners' concerns as to 'improper multiple dependent claims',
`
`Applicants have either deleted or amended all multiple dependent claims in question, and this
`
`issue has therefore been eliminated..
`
`In response to the Examiners' request to identify what subject matter, if any, of the
`
`pending application that is not entitled to the priority date of the parent application (Application
`
`Serial No. 09/400,413, which matured into U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850), Applicants confirm that
`
`all pending claims are entitled to the priority date of said parent application.
`
`Also in response to the November 16, 2010 interview, Applicants further submit
`
`concurrently with this response a supplemental section 1.132 declaration, specifically addressing
`
`the issue identified by Examiners regarding the scope of the evidence of secondary
`
`considerations vis-a-vis the scope of the pending claims, and the nexus between the evidence
`
`presented and the claims in the pending application. This supplemental section 1.132 declaration
`
`also provides substantial additional evidence of the "long felt need" and "commercial success"
`
`-14-
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`secondary considerations, in addition to that previously provided in Applicants' two earlier
`
`section 1.132 declarations.
`
`As stated in the supplemental 1.132 declaration and in section III below, applicants
`
`strongly believe that in addition to the totality of the secondary factors declaration confirming
`
``non obviousness' that as a minimum, the actual, contemporaneous documents from the
`
`inventive timeframe demonstrate the non-obviousness of the present invention vis-à-vis both the
`
`Micros and Cupps references.
`
`Additionally, Applicants respectfully request that the Examiner consider the discussion of
`
`non-obviousness presented in the Request for Continued Examination, which further
`
`demonstrates the inapplicability of the Micros, Kanevsky, and Chase references to the pending
`
`application.
`
`III. THE PRESENTLY SUBMITTED 1.132 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS
`PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF SECONDARY FACTORS AND THE
`NEXUS OF THESE FACTORS TO THE CLAIMS OF THE PRESENT
`APPLICATION.
`
`When a patent application presents evidence relating to secondary considerations, such
`
`evidence must always be considered in the determination of obviousness or non-obviousness.
`
`MPEP 2141, MPEP 2145; see also In re Sernaker, 702 F.2d 989, 996, 217 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir.
`
`1983). "Indeed, evidence of secondary considerations may often be the most probative and
`
`cogent evidence in the record. It may often establish that an invention appearing to have been
`
`obvious in light of the prior art was not." Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530,
`
`1538, 218 USPQ 981 (Fed. Cir. 1983). "Since at least Graham v. John Deere Co., . . . the
`
`commercial success of a patented invention is clearly important. That evidence is 'secondary' in
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`time does not mean that it is secondary in importance." Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air
`
`Engineering Inc., 813 F.2d 1207, 1212, 2 USPQ 2d 1034 (Fed. Cir. 1987).
`
`As an initial matter, Applicants request that, in addition to the evidence and discussion
`
`submitted concurrently with this Supplemental Response, the Examiner carefully review and
`
`consider both the May 12, 2010 Supplemental Declaration of Keith R. McNally and the
`
`Supplemental Declaration of Mr. McNally dated Aug 19, 2009, which also provide substantial
`
`evidence of non-obviousness. The following paragraphs briefly summarize the evidence of the
`
`prior 1.132 declarations.
`
`The technology of the present application was first introduced by Ameranth at the Food
`
`Service Technology Show in November 1998. Supplemental Declaration of Keith R. McNally,
`
`dated May 12, 2010 ("May 2010 Supp. Dec."), ¶ 2. The complete working prototype of the
`
`present invention was demonstrated at that November 1998 show. Supplemental Declaration of
`
`Keith R. McNally; dated August 19, 2009 ("2009 Supp. Dec."), 114. "Real time
`
`communication", an essential element of the claimed invention, was central to the inventive
`
`concept and shown in brochures distributed at both the November 1998 show and at the May
`
`1999 National Restaurant Show. 2009 Supp. Dec. 114-5.
`
`Symbol Technologies, a leader in mobile handheld devices, recognized the uniqueness of
`
`Ameranth's invention and accordingly partnered with Ameranth starting in December 1998, with
`
`a strategic alliance agreement being signed in February 1999. 2009 Supp. Dec. 116-7.
`
`Comtec Information Systems, recognizing the value and uniqueness of the present
`
`invention, formed a strategic relationship with Ameranth incorporating this technology in May
`
`1999. 2009 Supp. Dec. 118. Similarly, Aloha POS and Systems Concept Inc., after seeing this
`
`- 16-
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`technology at the May 1999 NRA show, subsequently partnered with Ameranth. 2009 Supp.
`
`Dec. 119-10.
`
`Food.com, an online food ordering business founded by Bryan Cupps and Tim Glass, the
`
`inventors of U.S. Patent 5,991,739, saw a demonstration of Ameranth's technology at the May.
`
`1999 NRA show, and recognized it as unique, inventive, and distinct from that of the Cupps
`
`patent (cited by the Examiner in the most recent Office Action), leading Food.com to sign a
`
`strategic agreement with Ameranth shortly after the May 1999 NRA show. 2009 Supp. Dec.
`
`11.
`
`Commercial success and industry recognition for the technology of the present invention
`
`continued on well after the 1998-1999 "early adopters". Red Lobster restaurants deployed this
`
`technology, as did Seasons 52 restaurants. May 2010 Supp. Dec. ¶ 5-6. Darden Restaurants,
`
`Inc., the operator of Red Lobster and Seasons 52, issued a press release touting Ameranth as its
`
`Wireless Strategic Partner. May 2010 Supp. Dec. ¶ 14; see also ¶ 16-17. Aloha POS, one of the
`
`world's largest point-of-sale systems, continued to use this technology. May 2010 Supp. Dec. ¶
`
`7. Symbol Technologies, in an October 2003 press release, highlighted the commercial
`
`successes of Ameranth's deployments of this technology, including the Medieval Times
`
`restaurants, an NBA-themed restaurant, numerous NBA arenas including Madison Square
`
`Garden, and other sports venues including the Green Bay Packers' Lambeau Field. May 2010
`
`Supp. Dec. ¶ 15, 19. Holiday Inn Hotels adopted the present invention's technology and praised
`
`it as "the first time technology like this is being used to increase a hotel's productivity." May
`
`2010 Supp. Dec. ¶ 18, 20-21. The Cheesecake Factory restaurant chain also adopted Ameranth's
`
`technology for its restaurants and praised Ameranth for it. May 2010 Supp. Dec. ¶ 22.
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`As further shown in these prior declarations, leading technology companies including
`
`Microsoft and Symbol Technologies made strategic, multi-million dollar investments into
`
`Ameranth, further confirming the tremendous value and uniqueness of Ameranth's technology,
`
`as are the partnerships and/or licenses with industry leaders including Food.com, Holiday Inn,
`
`Darden Restaurants, Radiant/Aloha and many others.
`
`Then, Ameranth won additional industry recognition for the technology claimed herein.
`
`Ameranth won three major, best product/technology awards for its 215` Century Restaurant
`
`System (a product marketing name surrounding the core inventive concepts of the present
`
`application and claims), one award of which was personally nominated by Bill Gates, Chairman
`
`of Microsoft. Further, Ameranth was universally recognized as the leading hospitality wireless
`
`systems integrator by the most prestigious and respected press and written publications -
`
`including both national publications (USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Time Magazine, The
`
`New York Times, The Chicago Sun Times and more) and the leading Hospitality Market
`
`Publications (including Nations Restaurant News, Hospitality Technology, Franchise Times, and
`
`Hotel Business).
`
`Another, presently-submitted, section 1.132 declaration of Keith R. McNally includes 13
`
`additional exhibits, showing that Food.com did not have the requisite solution to its ordering-
`
`system problems prior to partnering with Ameranth (Exh 1); extensively proving that the
`
`Ameranth products in question are indeed the subject of the claims herein (Exhs 2-12); and
`
`showing praise from a noted technology author, describing Ameranth's technology (claimed in
`
`this application) as "exceptionally innovative" and "market transforming".
`
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`Finally, the concurrently-filed section 1.132 "Nexus" Declaration of Keith R. McNally
`
`(Nexus Decl.), and the "Overview Summary" attached thereto, identify additional evidence and
`
`set forth, in great detail, the nexus between the evidence submitted and the claims pending in this
`
`application, as summarized below.
`
`A.
`
`Long-Felt Need
`
`As discussed in MPEP section 716.04, long-felt need can be established through evidence
`
`(1) that a problem existed in the art for a long period of time without solution; (2) that the long-
`
`felt need was not satisfied by another before the invention by applicant; and (3) that the invention
`
`in fact satisfies the long-felt need.
`
`The concurrently-filed section 1.132 "Nexus" Declaration of Keith R. McNally (Nexus
`
`Decl.) identifies the long felt need, recognized by Food.com and its predecessor company (in 3-
`
`5) that was not satisfied prior to Ameranth's invention, and the fact that Food.com entered into a
`
`licensing agreement with Ameranth, and that Micros sought an exclusive licensing agreement
`
`with Ameranth for the same technology, confirms that this long-felt need was satisfied by
`
`Ameranth's technology (In 6-9)
`
`B.
`
`Commercial Success
`
`Commercial success commensurate in scope with the claims is addressed in MPEP
`
`section 716.03 et seq. Commercial success attributable to claimed features of the invention
`
`satisfies the requirement, as noted in MPEP 716.03(a).
`
`The Nexus Declaration identifies the relevant commercial success, in 11110-13; this
`
`commercial success is also discussed in the 1.132 declaration submitted by Mr. McNally in May
`
`2010. The "menu wizard" and "communications wizard" that is at the heart of the Ameranth
`
`- 19 -
`
`
`
`Best Available Copy
`
`Serial No. 11/112,990 (cid:9)
`
`Docket No. 1004293.005US
`
`software sought by Food.com and Micros, and utilized by the companies named in ¶ 11 of the
`
`Dec. 2010 McNally Declaration, are claimed in the independent and dependent claims of the
`
`present application, as illustrated in the "Overview Summary" submitted with Mr. McNally's
`
`declaration (see, particularly, pages 2 and 3 of the Overview Summary).
`
`C. (cid:9)
`
`Nexus between secondary factors evidence and the pending claims
`
`The "Overview Summary" correlates the substantial, indeed overwhelming, evidence of
`
`secondary factors that Applicants have submitted with the claims pending in the application.
`
`As noted above, the critical features identified by Ameranth licensees and business
`
`partners, and in the awards and recognition received by Ameranth for this technology, are
`
`claimed in independent claims 103, 118, and 122, as well as their dependent claims. The nexus
`
`between this evidence and the pending claims is painstakingly set forth in the "Overview
`
`Summary" attached to the Dec. 2010 Nexus declaration submitted herewith.
`
`IV. THERE ARE NO MULTIPLE-DEPENDENT CLAIMS PENDING.
`
`During the November 16, 2010 interview, Examiner Brophy expressed a concern that
`
`multiple-dependent claims that were then pending may have been improperly dependent. In
`
`response to those concerns, Applicants have either deleted or amended all multiple dependent
`
`claims in question. Th