`
`
`
`CALDARELLI HEJMANOWSKI & PAGE LLP
`William J. Caldarelli (SBN #149573)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 720-8080
`Fax: (858) 720-6680
`wjc@chplawfirm.com
`
`FABIANO LAW FIRM, P.C.
`Michael D. Fabiano (SBN #167058)
`12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (619) 742-9631
`mdfabiano@fabianolawfirm.com
`
`OSBORNE LAW LLC
`John W. Osborne (Pro Hac Vice)
`33 Habitat Lane
`Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567
`Telephone: (914) 714-5936
`josborne@osborneipl.com
`
`WATTS LAW OFFICES
`Ethan M. Watts (SBN #234441)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 509-0808
`Facsimile: (619) 878-5784
`emw@ewattslaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`AMERANTH, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KAYAK SOFTWARE
`CORPORATION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 19
`
`
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. (“Ameranth”), for its First Amended Complaint
`
`against defendant Kayak Software Corporation (“KAYAK”), avers as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`1. Plaintiff Ameranth is a Delaware corporation having a principal place of
`
`business at 5820 Oberlin Drive, Suite 202, San Diego, California 92121.
`
`Ameranth develops, manufactures and sells, inter alia, hospitality industry,
`
`entertainment, restaurant and food service information technology solutions
`
`under the trademarks 21st Century Communications™, and 21st Century
`
`Restaurant™, among others, comprising the synchronization and integration of
`
`hospitality information and hospitality software applications between fixed,
`
`wireless and/or internet applications, including but not limited to computer
`
`servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems, desktop
`
`computers, laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld computing
`
`devices.
`2. Defendant KAYAK
`
`is, on
`
`information and belief, a Delaware
`
`corporation having a principal place of business and headquarters in Norwalk,
`
`Connecticut. On information and belief, KAYAK makes, uses, offers for sale or
`
`license and/or sells or licenses hotel and lodging, property management system
`
`(PMS) and other hospitality
`
`information-technology products, software,
`
`components and/or systems within this Judicial District, including the KAYAK
`
`Reservation System as defined herein.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`3. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of
`
`the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281-285.
`4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331
`
`and 1338(a).
`
`1
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 19
`
`
`
`5. On information and belief, Defendant engages in (a) the offer for sale or
`
`license and sale or license of hospitality, reservations, restaurant, food service,
`
`ordering, products and/or components in the United States, including this Judicial
`
`District, including services, products, software, and components, comprising
`
`wireless and internet POS and/or hospitality aspects; (b) the installation and
`
`maintenance of said services, products, software, components and/or systems in
`
`hospitality
`
`industry, hotel and
`
`lodging, restaurant, food service, and/or
`
`entertainment information technology systems in the United States, including this
`
`Judicial District; and/or (c) the use of hospitality industry, hotel and lodging,
`
`restaurant, food service, and/or entertainment information technology systems
`
`comprising said services, products, software, components and/or systems in the
`
`United States, including this Judicial District.
`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant
`
`commits acts of patent infringement in this Judicial District including, inter alia,
`
`making, using, offering for sale or license, and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`services, products, software, components and/or systems in this Judicial District.
`
`Additionally, Defendant has already appeared in this action and submitted to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Court. KAYAK has continued to engage in and perform such
`
`acts of infringement since the filing and service of the original complaint in this
`
`matter accusing KAYAK of infringement of the Ameranth patents at issue herein.
`7. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)
`
`and (c) and 1400(b).
`
`BACKGROUND
`8. Ameranth was established in 1996 to develop and provide its 21st
`
`Century Communications™ innovative information technology solutions for the
`
`hospitality industry (inclusive of, e.g., restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs,
`
`cruise ships and other entertainment and sports venues). Ameranth has been
`2
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 19
`
`
`
`widely recognized as a technology leader in the provision of wireless and
`
`internet-based systems and services to, inter alia, restaurants, hotels, casinos,
`
`cruise ships and entertainment and sports venues. Ameranth’s award winning
`
`inventions enable, in relevant part, generation and synchronization of menus,
`
`including but not limited to restaurant menus, event tickets, reservations and
`
`other products across fixed, wireless and/or internet platforms as well as
`
`synchronization of hospitality information and hospitality software applications
`
`across fixed, wireless and internet platforms, including but not limited to,
`
`computer servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems,
`
`desktop computers, laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld
`
`computing devices.
`9. Ameranth began development of the inventions leading to the patents in
`
`this patent family in the late Summer of 1998, at a time when the then-available
`
`wireless and internet hospitality offerings were extremely limited in functionality,
`
`were not synchronized and did not provide an integrated system-wide solution to
`
`the pervasive ordering,
`
`reservations, affinity program and
`
`information
`
`management needs of the hospitality industry. Ameranth uniquely recognized the
`
`actual problems that needed to be resolved in order to meet those needs, and
`
`thereafter conceived and developed its breakthrough inventions and products to
`
`provide systemic and comprehensive solutions directed to optimally meeting
`
`these industry needs. Ameranth has expended considerable effort and resources
`
`in inventing, developing and marketing its inventions and protecting its rights
`
`therein.
`10. Ameranth’s pioneering inventions have been widely adopted and are
`
`thus now essential to the modern wireless hospitality enterprise of the 21st
`
`Century. Ameranth’s solutions have been adopted, licensed and/or deployed by
`
`numerous entities across the hospitality industry.
`3
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 5 of 19
`
`
`
`11. The adoption of Ameranth’s technology by industry leaders and the wide
`
`acclaim received by Ameranth for its technological innovations are just some of
`
`the many confirmations of the breakthrough aspects of Ameranth’s inventions.
`
`Ameranth has received twelve different technology awards (three with “end
`
`customer” partners) and has been widely recognized as a hospitality
`
`wireless/internet technology leader by almost all major national and hospitality
`
`print publications, e.g., The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, USA Today
`
`and many others. Ameranth was personally nominated by Bill Gates, the
`
`Founder of Microsoft, for the prestigious Computerworld Honors Award that
`
`Ameranth
`
`received
`
`in
`
`2001
`
`for
`
`its
`
`breakthrough
`
`synchronized
`
`reservations/ticketing system with the Improv Comedy Theatres. In his
`
`nomination, Mr. Gates described Ameranth as “one of the leading pioneers of
`
`information technology for the betterment of mankind.” This prestigious award
`
`was based on Ameranth’s innovative synchronization of wireless/web/fixed
`
`hospitality software technology. Subsequently, the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office granted Ameranth a number of currently-issued patents, some
`
`of which are the basis for this lawsuit. Ameranth has issued press releases
`
`announcing these patent grants on business wires, on its web sites and at
`
`numerous trade shows since the first of the presently-asserted patents issued in
`
`2002. A number of companies have licensed patents and technology from
`
`Ameranth, recognizing and confirming the value of Ameranth’s innovations. At
`
`all relevant times, Ameranth marked its own products with the numbers of the
`
`Ameranth patents then issued, thereby providing companies, competitors and
`
`participants in the hospitality industry with notice of Ameranth’s patents.
`
`Furthermore, companies that license Ameranth’s products have marked their
`
`products with Ameranth’s patent numbers, thereby also providing notice of
`
`Ameranth’s patents.
`
`4
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 6 of 19
`
`
`
`RELATED CASES PREVIOUSLY FILED
`12. The Ameranth patents asserted herein, U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (the
`
`“’850 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 6,871,325 (the “’325 patent”), and U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,146,077 (the “’077 patent”), are all patents in Ameranth’s “Information
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications” patent family.
`13. Ameranth is also currently asserting claims of these same patents in
`
`separate lawsuits, against other defendants, that are already pending in this Court.
`
`The first-filed lawsuit asserts claims of the ‘850 and ‘325 patents and is entitled
`
`Ameranth v. Pizza Hut, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-01810-JLS-NLS. Lawsuits
`
`subsequently filed by Ameranth in this Court, asserting claims of the ‘077 patent,
`
`include Case Nos. 3:12-cv-00729-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00731-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-
`
`00732-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00733-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00737-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-
`
`00738-JLS-NLS (settled); 3:12-cv-00739-JLS-NLS and 3:12-cv-00742-JLS-
`
`NLS. Other lawsuits filed by Ameranth in this Court asserting claims of the
`
`‘850, ‘325, and ‘077 patents are Case No. 3:12-cv-00858-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-
`
`1201-JLS-NLS (settled): 3:12-cv-01651-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01629-JLS-NLS;
`
`3:12-cv-01630-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01631-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01634-JLS-NLS;
`
`3:12-cv-01654-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01636-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01653-JLS-NLS;
`
`3:12-cv-01642-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01643-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01644-JLS-NLS;
`
`3:12-cv-01646-JLS-NLS 3:12-cv-01647-JLS-NLS (settled); 3:12-cv-01648-JLS-
`
`NLS; 3:12-cv-01649-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01650-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01652-JLS-
`
`NLS; 3:12-cv-01633-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01627-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01655-JLS-
`
`NLS; 3:12-cv-01656-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-01659-JLS-NLS (settled); 3:13-cv-
`
`00350-JLS-NLS; 3:13-cv-00352-JLS-NLS; 3:13-cv-00353-JLS-NLS; 3:13-cv-
`
`0836-JLS-NLS and 3:13-cv-01072-MMA-BGS. All of the above still-pending
`
`cases have been consolidated for pre-trial through claim construction except for
`
`3:13-cv-00350-JLS-NLS; 3:13-cv-00352-JLS-NLS; 3:13-cv-00353-JLS-NLS;
`5
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 7 of 19
`
`
`
`3:13-cv-0836-JLS-NLS and 3:13-cv-01072-MMA-BGS. These include lawsuits
`
`against business partners of Defendant, such as hotel companies with whom
`
`Defendant does business.
`14. The original complaint in this matter against Defendant was filed in this
`
`Court on June 29, 2012, and subsequently served upon KAYAK. At least since
`
`that time, KAYAK has had direct and knowledge of Ameranth’s patents and that
`
`KAYAK’s online and mobile reservations system infringes those patents as
`
`alleged therein. Nonetheless, Defendant has continued, and is continuing, to
`
`make, use, offer for sale or license and/or sell or license infringing systems,
`
`products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth and to engage in acts of infringement as set forth herein.
`
`COUNT I
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,384,850)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`15. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
`
`1-14 above as if fully set forth herein.
`16. On May 7, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,384,850 entitled
`
`“Information Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu
`
`Generation” (“the ‘850 patent”) (a true and copy of which is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit A) was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent & Trademark
`
`Office.
`17. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title
`
`and interest in and to the ‘850 patent.
`18. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to
`
`directly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), by making, using, offering for sale or license
`
`and/or selling or licensing infringing systems, products, and/or services in the
`6
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 8 of 19
`
`
`
`United States without authority or license from Ameranth, including but not
`
`limited to the KAYAK Reservation system/product/service, which includes, inter
`
`alia, hotel/lodging-reservation and property management system
`
`(PMS)
`
`integration, online and mobile hotel/lodging reservations, integration with e-mail
`
`and affinity program and social media applications such as Facebook, Twitter,
`
`Groupon, and YouTube, and/or other third-party web-based applications, and
`
`other hospitality aspects (the “KAYAK Reservation System”). Ameranth has
`
`previously served Defendant with infringement contentions in this action further
`
`describing the details of KAYAK’s infringement of Ameranth’s patents. Those
`
`infringement contentions are attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated
`
`herein by reference.
`19. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System, as
`
`deployed and/or used at or from one or more locations by KAYAK, its
`
`agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or
`
`their customers,
`
`infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, by, inter
`
`alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting menus in
`
`a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable
`
`main menus, modifier menus, and sub-modifier menus, and application software
`
`for generating a second menu and transmitting it to a wireless handheld
`
`computing device or a Web page; and/or (b) Enabling reservations and other
`
`hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-enabled wireless
`
`handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless
`
`handheld computing device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and
`
`synchronizing applications and data, including but not limited to applications and
`
`data relating to ordering, between at least one central database, wireless handheld
`7
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 19
`
`
`
`computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web page; utilizing an
`
`interface that provides a single point of entry that allows the synchronization of at
`
`least one wireless handheld computing device and at least one Web page with at
`
`least one central database; allowing information to be entered via Web pages,
`
`transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least one
`
`central database and to wireless handheld computing devices; allowing
`
`information to be entered via wireless handheld computing devices, transmitted
`
`over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least one central database
`
`and to Web pages.
`20. On information and belief, defendant KAYAK has indirectly infringed
`
`and continues to indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of
`
`the ‘850 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and
`
`intentionally inducing direct infringement by other persons.
`21. On information and belief, customers of KAYAK, including consumers
`
`and hotel/restaurant operators, use the KAYAK Reservation System in a manner
`
`that infringes the Ameranth patents. KAYAK provides instruction and direction
`
`regarding the use of the KAYAK Reservation System, and advertises, promotes,
`
`and encourages the use of the KAYAK Reservation System in a manner
`
`understood and intended by KAYAK to infringe Ameranth’s patents. Defendant
`
`provides such instruction, direction and encouragement regarding infringing use
`
`of the KAYAK Reservations System on its webpages, in advertising, in user
`
`videos, in offerings on mobile “app stores,” in press releases and in statements in
`
`industry news articles, as demonstrated in the infringement contentions attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit D and in the references cited in the appendix thereto.
`22. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System infringes
`
`one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for the reasons set
`
`forth hereinabove.
`
`8
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 10 of 19
`
`
`
`23. At least since the filing and service of the original complaint against
`
`KAYAK in this matter, KAYAK has had knowledge of the ‘850 patent, and
`
`knew or should have known that its continued offering and deployment of the
`
`KAYAK Reservation System, and
`
`its continued support of consumers,
`
`hotel/restaurant operators, and other users of this system/product/service, would
`
`induce direct infringement by those users. Additionally, KAYAK intended that
`
`its actions would induce direct infringement of Ameranth’s patents by those
`
`users.
`24. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and
`
`continues to indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the
`
`‘850 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`25. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling
`
`or licensing the KAYAK Reservation System, KAYAK provides non-staple
`
`articles of commerce to others, including consumers and hotel/restaurant
`
`operators, for use in infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally,
`
`KAYAK provides instruction and direction regarding the use of the KAYAK
`
`Reservation System, and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of the
`
`KAYAK Reservation System. Users of the KAYAK Reservation System
`
`directly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for
`
`the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`26. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System infringes
`
`one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, for the reasons set
`
`forth hereinabove.
`27. On information and belief, KAYAK has had knowledge of the ‘850
`
`patent at least since the filing and service of the original complaint in this action
`
`against KAYAK, including knowledge that the KAYAK Reservation System,
`
`which is a non-staple article of commerce, has been used as a material part of the
`9
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 11 of 19
`
`
`
`claimed invention of the ‘850 patent, and that there are no substantial non-
`
`infringing uses for the KAYAK Reservation System.
`28. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant KAYAK has directly and
`
`proximately caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from
`
`sales or licensing it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined,
`
`the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to
`
`Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT II
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,871,325)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`29. Plaintiff reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in
`
`paragraphs 1-28 above as if fully set forth herein.
`30. On March 22, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,871,325 entitled
`
`“Information Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu
`
`Generation” (“the ‘325 patent”) (a true and correct copy of which is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit B) was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent &
`
`Trademark Office.
`31. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title
`
`and interest in and to the ‘325 patent.
`32. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to
`
`directly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), by making, using, offering for sale or license
`
`and/or selling or licensing infringing systems, products, and/or services in the
`
`United States without authority or license from Ameranth, including but not
`
`limited to the KAYAK Reservation System. Ameranth has previously served
`
`Defendant with infringement contentions in this action further describing the
`
`details of KAYAK’s infringement of Ameranth’s patents. Those infringement
`10
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 12 of 19
`
`
`
`contentions are attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`33. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System, as
`
`deployed and/or used at or from one or more locations by KAYAK, its
`
`agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or
`
`their customers,
`
`infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, by, inter
`
`alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting menus in
`
`a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable
`
`main menus, modifier menus, and sub-modifier menus, and application software
`
`for generating a second menu and transmitting it to a wireless handheld
`
`computing device or a Web page; and/or (b) Enabling reservations and other
`
`hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-enabled wireless
`
`handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless
`
`handheld computing device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and
`
`synchronizing applications and data, including but not limited to applications and
`
`data relating to orders, between at least one central database, wireless handheld
`
`computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web page; and sending
`
`alerts, confirmations, and other information regarding orders to various wireless
`
`mobile devices.
`34. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and
`
`continues to indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the
`
`‘325 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and
`
`intentionally inducing direct infringement by other persons.
`35. On information and belief, customers of KAYAK, including consumers
`
`and hotel/restaurant operators, use the KAYAK Reservation System in a manner
`11
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 13 of 19
`
`
`
`that infringes upon one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent.
`
`KAYAK provides instruction and direction regarding the use of the KAYAK
`
`Reservation System and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of the
`
`KAYAK Reservation System in a manner understood and intended by Defendant
`
`to infringe Ameranth’s patents. Defendant provides such instruction, direction
`
`and encouragement regarding infringing use of the KAYAK Reservations System
`
`on its webpages, in advertising, in user videos, in offerings on mobile “app
`
`stores,” in press releases and in statements in industry news articles, as
`
`demonstrated in the infringement contentions attached hereto as Exhibit D and in
`
`the references cited in the appendix thereto.
`36. On information and belief, Defendant actively induces others to infringe
`
`the ‘325 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(b) by knowingly encouraging,
`
`aiding and abetting customers of KAYAK,
`
`including consumers and
`
`hotel/restaurant operators, to use the infringing KAYAK Reservation System in
`
`the United States without authority or license from Ameranth in a manner
`
`understood and intended by Defendant to infringe Ameranth’s patents.
`37. On information and belief, Defendant contributorily infringes and
`
`continues to contributorily infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of
`
`the ‘325 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), by offering to sell and/or
`
`selling components of systems on which claims of the ‘325 patent read,
`
`constituting a material part of the invention, knowing that the components were
`
`especially adapted for use in systems which infringe claims of the ‘325 patent.
`38. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling
`
`or licensing the KAYAK Reservation System, Defendant provides non-staple
`
`articles of commerce to others for use in infringing systems, products, and/or
`
`services. Additionally, KAYAK provides instruction and direction regarding the
`
`use of the KAYAK Reservation System and advertises, promotes, and
`12
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 14 of 19
`
`
`
`encourages the use of the KAYAK Reservation System in manner understood
`
`and intended by Defendant to infringe Ameranth’s patents, as described above.
`
`Users of the KAYAK Reservation System directly infringe one or more valid and
`
`enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`39. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System infringes
`
`one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set
`
`forth hereinabove.
`40. On information and belief, KAYAK has had knowledge of the ‘325
`
`patent at least since the filing and service of the original complaint in this matter
`
`upon KAYAK, including knowledge that the KAYAK Reservation System,
`
`which is a non-staple articles of commerce, has been used as a material part of
`
`the claimed invention of the ‘325 patent, and that there are no substantial non-
`
`infringing uses for the KAYAK Reservation System.
`41. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant KAYAK has directly and
`
`proximately caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from
`
`sales or licensing it would have made but for the infringements. Unless enjoined,
`
`the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and cause irreparable injury to
`
`Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT III
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 8,146,077)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`42. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
`
`1-41 above as if fully set forth herein.
`43. On March 27, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,146,077 entitled
`
`“Information Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu
`
`Generation, and Handwriting and Voice Modification of Orders” (a true copy of
`
`13
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`Case No. 12-cv-1640 JLS (NLS)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Starbucks, Ex. 1080, Starbucks v. Ameranth, CBM2015-00099
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01640-DMS-WVG Document 28 Filed 07/26/13 Page 15 of 19
`
`
`
`which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference) was
`
`duly and legally issued by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`44. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title
`
`and interest in and to the ‘077 patent.
`45. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to
`
`directly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), by making, using, offering for sale or license
`
`and/or selling or licensing infringing systems, products, and/or services in the
`
`United States without authority or license from Ameranth, including but not
`
`limited to the KAYAK Reservation System.
`46. On information and belief, the KAYAK Reservation System, as
`
`deployed and/or used at or from one or more locations by KAYAK, its
`
`agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or
`
`their customers,
`
`infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, by, inter
`
`alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Configuring and transmitting menus
`
`in a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable
`
`master menus, menu configuration software enabled to generate a menu
`
`configuration for a wireless handheld computing device in conformity with a
`
`customized display layout, and enabled for synchronous communications and to
`
`format the menu configuration for a customized display layout of at least two
`
`different wireless handheld computing device display sizes, and/or (b) Enabling
`
`reservations and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other
`
`internet-enabled wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages,
`
`storing hospitality information and data on at least one database, on at least one
`
`wireless handheld computing device, and on at least one Web ser