`Patent 5,940,510
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COMPASS BANK, DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, DISCOVER BANK,
`DISCOVER PRODUCTS INC., and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
`INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case CBM2015-00098
`Patent 5,940,510
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and KERRY
`BEGLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00098
`Patent 5,940,510
`
`Petitioner Compass Bank, Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank,
`
`
`
`Discover Products Inc., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
`
`(collectively “Petitioner”), and Patent Owner Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
`
`(collectively “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as
`
`follows:
`
`1. On September 22, 2015, October 2, 2015, and October 7, 2015,
`
`respectively, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a Case Management and
`
`Scheduling Order ( “Scheduling Orders”) in each of the three related Covered
`
`Business Method Patent Reviews of Patent Nos. 5,940,510 (Case CBM2015-
`
`00098), 6,104,013 (Case CBM2015-00101) and 6,237,095 (Case CBM2015-
`
`00102), respectively. Each of these three Scheduling Orders sets the same “due
`
`dates for the parties to take action after institution” in these three related cases.
`
`3.
`
`Each Scheduling Order states “parties may stipulate to different dates
`
`for DUE DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than DUE DATE 6).”
`
`3.
`
`The Parties have stipulated to different dates for DUE DATES 1 and 2
`
`in these three cases. The following table provides the stipulated date modifications:
`
`
`
`Original DUE DATE
`
`New DUE DATE
`
`DUE DATE 1
`
`December 23, 2015
`
`January 13, 2016
`
`DUE DATE 2
`
`March 23, 2016
`
`April 13, 2016
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00098
`Patent 5,940,510
`
`In each of these three cases, the tasks corresponding to the above DUE
`
`
`
`
`
`DATES listed in the Scheduling Order remain unchanged. Further, DUE DATES
`
`3-7 remain unchanged.
`
`This stipulation is being filed simultaneously in substantially identical form
`
`in each of these three related cases CBM2015-00098, CBM2015-00101 and
`
`CBM2015-00102.
`
`
`
`Date: November 24, 2015
`
`
` /Kenneth J. Weatherwax/
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`1880 Century Park East
`Suite 815
`
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Telephone: (310) 307-4503
`Facsimile: (310) 307-4509
`Email:
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`2
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /William F. Long/
`
`William F. Long, Reg. No. 51,967
`DENTONS US LLP
`303 Peachtree Street, NE
`Suite 5300
`Atlanta, Georgia 30308
`Telephone: (404) 527-4000
`Facsimile: (404) 527-4198
`Email: bill.long@dentons.com
`
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2015-00098
`Patent 5,940,510
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the following documents were served
`
`on November 24, 2015 by electronic service by agreement between the parties:
`
`
`STIPULATION TO EXTEND DUE DATES
`
`
`
`The names and address of the parties being served are as follows:
`William F. Long
`blong@mckennalong.com
`
`Truman Fenton
`tfenton@sgbfirm.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____/Kenneth J. Weatherwax/_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`
`Date: November 24, 2015
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
