throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` WEAVER
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` Cases CBM2015-00080, CBM2015-00082
` Patent Nos. 6,384,850, 6,871,325
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`APPLE, INC., et al,
` Petitioners,
`vs.
`AMERANTH, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ALFRED C. WEAVER, PH.D.
` Charlottesville, Virginia
` Friday, February 26, 2016
`
`Reported by:
`SUSAN ASHE, RPR, RMR
`Job No.: 103091
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
` WEAVER
` Friday, February 26, 2016
` 9:04 a.m.
`
`Page 2
`
` Videotaped deposition of ALFRED C. WEAVER,
`PH.D., taken on behalf of the Petitioners, at the
`OMNI CHARLOTTESVILLE HOTEL, 212 Ridge McIntire Road,
`Charlottesville, Virginia, beginning at 9:04 a.m.,
`on Friday, February 26, 2016, before Susan Ashe,
`RMR, CRR.
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
` WEAVER
`APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL:
`
` FOR PETITIONERS:
` DLA PIPER
` BY: ROBERT WILLIAMS, ESQ.
` 401 B Street
` San Diego, California 92101
`
`
`
` NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT
` BY: GILBERT GREENE, ESQ.
` 98 San Jacinto Boulevard
` Austin, Texas 78701
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
` WEAVER
`APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Continued):
`
` FOR THE PATENT OWNER AND THE WITNESS:
`
` OSBORNE LAW
`
` BY: JOHN OSBORNE, ESQ.
`
` 33 Habitat Lane
`
` Cortlandt Manor, New York 10567
`
`ALSO PRESENT: Krishna Sharma, Videographer
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
` WEAVER
` INDEX
` Deposition of ALFRED C. WEAVER, PH.D.
` February 26, 2016
`
`Examination By: Page
`Mr. Williams 8
`Mr. Osborne 272
`
`WEAVER
`Exhibit No. Marked
`Exhibit 1 Declaration of
` Alfred C. Weaver, Ph.D. 14
`Exhibit 2 U.S. Patent 6,384,850 22
`Exhibit 3 U.S. Patent 6,871,325 22
`Exhibit 4 Microsoft Computer Dictionary
` Fourth Edition 54
`Exhibit 5 U.S. Patent 5,948,040 138
`Exhibit 6 Economy Watch
` Hospitality Industry Printout 187
`Exhibit 7 "What Exactly is the Hospitality
` Industry" Article 188
`Exhibit 8 Patent Owner Exhibit 2024 207
`Exhibit 9 Patent Owner Exhibit 2050 229
`Exhibit 10 Patent Owner Exhibit 2051 234
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
` WEAVER
` E X H I B I T S (Continued)
`WEAVER
`Exhibit No. Marked
`Exhibit 11 Patent Owner Exhibit 2025 241
`Exhibit 12 Exhibit 43 252
`Exhibit 13 Patent Owner Exhibit 2027 258
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning,
`everyone.
` This is the start of media labeled
`No. 1 of the videotaped deposition of
`Dr. Alfred C. Weaver, in the matter of Apple,
`Inc. versus Ameranth, Inc., filed in the
`United States Patent and Trial Office, before
`the Patent and Trial Appeal Board.
` The date today is February 26, 2016.
` And the time on the video monitor is
`9:04.
` This deposition is being held at 212
`McIntire Road, Charlottesville, Virginia.
` My name is Krishna Sharma. I am the
`legal video specialist from TSG Reporting, Inc.
` And the court reporter today is
`Miss Susan, also in association with TSG.
` At this time I would like to request
`the attorneys to identify themselves.
` And after that, our court reporter
`will swear in the witness and we can begin.
` MR. WILLIAMS: This is Rob Williams,
`with DLA Piper, on behalf of petitioner Apple,
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Starwood, and Eventbrite.
` MR. GREENE: Bert Greene, from Norton
` Rose Fulbright, on behalf of the petitioners in
` the joint proceeding: Expedia, Fandango,
` Hotels.com, HotelTonight, hotwire, KAYAK,
` OpenTable, Orbitz, Papa John's, StubHub,
` Ticketmaster, Live Nation, Travelocity,
` Wanderspot, Agilysys, Domino's, Hilton, MOBO,
` Pizza Hut, and Usablenet.
` MR. OSBORNE: John Osborne, of
` Osborne Law LLC, representing patent owner
` Ameranth, Inc., and here on behalf of
` Dr. Weaver today.
`Whereupon,
` ALFRED C. WEAVER, PH.D.,
`a Witness, called for examination, having been first
`duly sworn according to law, was examined and
`testified as follows:
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. WILLIAMS:
` Q. Good morning.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Would you please state your name.
` A. Alfred C. Weaver.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. And what is your current address?
` A. My business address is Department of
`Computer Science, University of Virginia, 85
`Engineers Way, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904.
` Q. Have you ever been deposed before?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Approximately how many times?
` A. Approximately twelve.
` Q. And how many of those depositions were in
`the context of patent cases?
` A. Twelve.
` Q. Were any of your prior depositions in the
`context of a PTAB proceeding?
` A. One.
` Q. Okay. I take it you're very familiar with
`the rules of a deposition.
` Just to make sure we're on the same
`page, I'd like to ask you a few -- set a few ground
`rules.
` First, you understand that your
`testimony is under oath as if you're in court today?
` A. I do.
` Q. And that your obligation to tell the truth
`today is just the same as if you were testifying in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`court -- do you understand that?
` A. I understand that.
` Q. If you don't understand one of my
`questions today, please let me know.
` A. (Witness nods head.)
` Q. And if you do answer one of my questions
`today, I'll assume you understood the question.
` Is that fair?
` A. Okay.
` Q. Your attorney may object from time to time
`today, but you still have to answer the question.
` Do you understand that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. The one exception is: If your attorney
`specifically instructs you not to answer the
`question, then you don't have to answer the
`question.
` Do you understand that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is there any reason you can't provide full
`and truthful testimony today?
` A. No.
` Q. What did you do to prepare for today's
`deposition?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` A. I met with Mr. Osborne on Tuesday and
`again on Thursday.
` I read the patents.
` I read my declaration.
` I read the exhibits to the patents,
`and did a lot of thinking about what the words of
`the patents really mean.
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection, to the
` extent it calls for privileged information.
` Q. Aside from meeting with Mr. Osborne, did
`you meet with anyone else also in preparation for
`today's deposition?
` A. No.
` Q. Aside from the documents that you
`mentioned, did you review any other documents in
`preparation for today's deposition?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you bring any documents with you
`today?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And what documents are those?
` A. This is my declaration, the '850 patent
`and the '325 patent.
` Q. And it looks like the copy of your
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`declaration is tabbed or perhaps marked up.
` Is that accurate?
` A. It's only tabbed.
` Q. Okay. And what do the tabs indicate?
` A. They're identifying some major portions of
`the declaration, like the claim construction.
` Q. Is there any significance to the different
`colors of the tabs?
` A. No.
` Q. You served as an expert witness in patent
`litigation a number of times.
` Is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. How many times have you been an expert in
`a PTAB proceeding?
` A. Counting this one, it would be three.
` Q. And what were the other two?
` A. PAID versus eBay and -- I'm trying to get
`it right -- Amazon versus PMC.
` Q. In the PAID versus eBay case, did you
`represent patent owner or petitioner?
` A. The patent owner.
` Q. Were you deposed?
` A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. Has there been a final written decision in
`that case?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. So it's fair to say you don't know the
`outcome?
` A. I don't know the outcome.
` Q. In the Amazon case, were you representing
`patent owner or petitioner?
` A. The patent owner.
` Q. Were you deposed in that case?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And was there a final written decision?
` A. Not that I know of.
` Q. Have you ever been an expert in a patent
`reexamination proceeding?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever submitted a declaration in a
`patent reexamination proceeding?
` A. No.
` Q. I take it you served expert declarations
`in each of the two prior PTAB proceedings?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Have you ever been precluded from
`testifying as an expert in any forum?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever had any portion of an expert
`report stricken?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever had any portion of an expert
`declaration stricken?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever been subject to a Daubert
`challenge?
` A. No.
` MR. WILLIAMS: Let's mark this as
` Weaver Exhibit 1.
` (Whereupon, Weaver Exhibit 1 was marked
`for identification.)
` Q. You've just been handed the document
`marked Weaver Exhibit 1.
` Is this a copy of your declaration in
`this proceeding -- including appendices A and B?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you draw up this declaration?
` A. I did with the consultation with counsel.
` Q. And how much time did you spend working on
`this declaration?
` A. Wow -- a lot.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. Can you provide an estimate of the number
`of hours?
` A. Um-hum -- say, between 40 and 50 hours.
` Q. Before signing the declaration, were you
`comfortable that each statement in the declaration
`was true and accurate?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And I believe you testified that you
`reviewed the declaration again in preparation for
`today's deposition?
` A. I did.
` Q. Are you still comfortable that everything
`in your declaration is still true and accurate?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is everything in your declaration still
`your opinion today?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So if you look in Weaver Exhibit 1, it's a
`-- actually, a bound copy that's got two tabs.
` The two tabs are A and B, which
`represent Appendices A and B to your declaration.
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Let's turn to Exhibit A -- I'm sorry,
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`Appendix A.
` Appendix A is a copy of your resume?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. And does Appendix A list all of your
`experience relevant to this CBM proceeding?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection, to the
` extent that all the -- all the experience
` relevant to this proceeding is vague and
` unclear.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are you the inventor on any issued
`patents?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do any of your patents relate to the
`hospitality industry?
` A. No.
` Q. You published a number of books and book
`chapters. Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Do any of your books or book chapters
`relate to the hospitality industry?
` A. The books and book chapters relate to
`computer technologies that might be used in the
`hospitality industry.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` But the publications are not about
`the hospitality industry.
` Q. Do any of your books or book chapters
`discuss technology used in the hospitality industry?
` A. Yeah. There are several publications
`about communications protocols.
` And they might be used in the
`hospitality industry.
` Q. Okay. Is it fair to say that the books
`and book chapters don't specifically mention or
`describe the hospitality industry?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. You published a number of publications.
`Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Do any of your publications directly
`relate to the hospitality industry?
` A. The publications like the books and book
`chapters are about technology that might be utilized
`in the hospitality industry.
` But they are not about the
`hospitality industry.
` Q. Okay. And is it fair to say that your
`publications don't specifically mention the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`hospitality industry or technology used in the
`hospitality industry?
` A. They mention technology that might be used
`in the hospitality industry.
` Q. All right. But they don't specifically
`mention the hospitality industry. Fair?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Have you ever held any consulting
`positions for companies in the hospitality industry?
` A. No. All of my consulting was technical.
` Q. Do you belong to any professional
`societies relating to the hospitality industry?
` A. Professional societies, yes -- not
`related, though, to the hospitality industry.
` Q. Have you received any honors or awards
`relating to the hospitality industry?
` A. I have received honors and awards, but
`they're not from hospitality industry.
` Q. Do you teach any courses relating to the
`hospitality industry?
` A. My courses are computer science courses --
`so, no.
` Let me amend that last answer.
` The course that I have taught for the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`last several years is called "Electronic Commerce."
` And we build applications that can be
`used in a variety of applications.
` So it is common for student projects
`to build systems that, when they leave the
`classroom, they've got a template for a system that
`-- that could become a -- a working e-commerce
`business.
` So I've supervised projects that --
`that have a bit of a hospitality flavor to them, but
`nothing for the hospitality industry.
` Q. And can you explain what you mean by "a
`bit of a hospitality flavor"?
` A. Yes; that -- systems that collect user
`preferences, that track user loyalty, or that make
`reservations for events.
` Those are common student projects.
` Q. Did you found or cofound any companies
`prior to 2000?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Were any of those companies in the
`hospitality industry?
` A. They were not.
` Q. Is it true that you've worked full time in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`academia since obtaining your Ph.D.?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Switching gears a little bit, you've been
`retained by counsel for Ameranth in the CBM
`proceeding.
` Is that correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Has counsel for Ameranth also retained you
`in the district court litigations?
` A. No.
` Q. When were you retained in this matter?
` A. It would be about October 2015.
` Q. And do you recall who from Ameranth
`contacted you about this matter?
` A. That was Mr. Osborne.
` Q. Aside from any documents that may have
`been exhibits to papers in this proceeding, have you
`reviewed any documents relating to any of the
`underlying district court litigations?
` A. I don't remember.
` Q. Are you currently retained by Apple in any
`matter?
` A. No.
` Q. How about Starwood?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` A. No.
` Q. How about Eventbrite?
` A. No.
` Q. How about any of the petitioners in the
`joint proceeding?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you do any work for Apple?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever done any work for Apple?
` A. No.
` Q. Have you ever been adverse to Apple in any
`litigation or other proceeding?
` A. No.
` Q. Do you consider yourself to be an expert
`in any fields?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What fields are those?
` A. Computer science, computer networks,
`communication systems design, microprocessors,
`microcomputers, computer networks.
` Q. Do you consider yourself an expert in
`hospitality industry software?
` A. I understand the hospitality industry
`software.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. But you wouldn't consider yourself an
`expert in that field?
` A. No.
` MR. WILLIAMS: I'm going to hand you
` two more documents for the record.
` I know you already have them in your
` binder. But let's mark this document as
` Exhibit 2, Weaver Exhibit 2.
` (Whereupon, Weaver Exhibit 2 was marked
`for identification.)
` MR. WILLIAMS: Let's make this one
` Weaver Exhibit 3.
` (Whereupon, Weaver Exhibit 3 was marked
`for identification.)
` Q. Weaver Exhibit 2 is a copy of U.S. Patent
`6,384,850.
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. And for purposes of today's discussion,
`I'll refer to this patent as the "'850 patent."
` Is that okay?
` A. That's fine.
` Q. Weaver Exhibit 3 is a copy of U.S. Patent
`6,871,325.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. And again, for the purposes of today's
`discussion, I'll refer to this as the "'325 patent."
` Is that okay?
` A. That's fine.
` Q. You've read the '850 patent. Correct?
` A. I have.
` Q. You've also read the '325 patent.
`Correct?
` A. I have.
` Q. And the '850 and '325 patent are the
`subjects of your declaration in this matter.
`Correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. The '850 patent was filed on September 21,
`1999. Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And at that time, databases were well
`known in the art. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Database software was commercially
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`available at that time. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope.
` A. Correct.
` Q. Web servers were known in the art at the
`time of the filing of the '850 patent. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Web server software was commercially
`available at that time. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Outside the scope.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Web servers that included software for
`monitoring HTTP requests to the server were known in
`the art at the time of the filing of the '850
`patent. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. I didn't render opinion on that subject
`directly.
` But I did interpret web server. And
`that's in my declaration.
` Q. And where in your declaration do you
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`interpret "web server"?
` A. That's paragraph 30.
` Q. Okay. And in paragraph 30 of your
`declaration, you cite to a Microsoft computer
`dictionary definition of "web server."
` Is that correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Okay. At the time of the filing of the
`'850 patent, web servers included software for
`monitoring HTTP requests. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Outside the scope of
` direct.
` A. Would you repeat that?
` MR. WILLIAMS: Could you repeat the
` question, please.
` (Whereupon, the reporter read back
` from the record, as follows:
` "At the time of the filing of the
` '850 patent, web servers included software for
` monitoring HTTP requests. Correct?")
` A. Correct.
` Q. And at the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, web servers included software for routing
`HTTP responses to the device that made the request.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. I did not -- I did not opine upon that
`question here in my declaration.
` Q. Well, I'm trying to understand your
`understanding of the term "web server," which you've
`defined in your declaration --
` A. (Witness nods head.)
` Q. -- and how one of ordinary skill in the
`art would understand that term at the time of the
`filing. Okay?
` A. (Witness nods head.)
` Q. So with that context in mind, I'll repeat
`my question.
` At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, web servers included software for routing
`HTTP responses to the device that made the request.
`Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: The same objection.
` A. There is HTTP request primitive and an
`HTTP response primitive.
` And issuing the response would return
`data to the issuer of the request.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. And the web server had to include software
`that would know which device to return the HTTP
`response to. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. The HTTP response would be returned to the
`device that made the HTTP request.
` Q. And what piece of software was responsible
`for determining which device to send the HTTP
`response to?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; unclear.
` Objection; assumes facts not
` apparent.
` A. That would be software in the web server.
` Q. At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, web pages weren't known in the art.
`Correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, APIs were a well-known concept. Correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I think there might have been a
`transcription error in my previous question. So
`I'll ask it one more time.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, web pages "were" known in the art. Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And at the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, web-based e-commerce systems were known in
`the art. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. I did not discuss anything other than the
`patents and the DeLorme system in my declaration.
` Q. Based on your experience, you understand
`that web-based e-commerce systems were known at the
`time of the '850 patent's filing. Correct?
` A. They were.
` Q. And were web-based e-commerce systems in
`the hospitality industry known in the art at the
`time of the '850 patent?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope.
` A. I don't know.
` Q. The '850 patent describes a web-based
`architecture. Correct?
` (No response.)
` Q. Let me ask a clearer question.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` A. Sure.
` Q. One of the things discussed in the '850
`patent is a web-based architecture. Correct?
` A. The '850 patent does involve a web server.
` So a part of the '850 patent is
`web-based.
` Q. Okay. And the web server communicates
`with a web client, such as a web browser. Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And architectures such as those are
`sometimes referred to as "client server
`architectures." Correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, client server architectures were known.
`Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Outside the scope of
` direct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. And web-based client server architectures
`were known. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Outside the scope of
` direct.
` A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. And web-based client server architectures
`that interfaced with databases were known at the
`time of the filing of the '850 patent. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Outside the scope of
` direct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. At the time of the filing of the '850
`patent, synchronizing data between a database and a
`web server was known in the art. Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope.
` A. I don't understand the question.
` Q. Well, at the time of the '850 patent, was
`it known in the art that data in a database could be
`synchronized with data sent and received by a web
`server?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope.
` A. I'm sorry, but the question is still
`unclear to me.
` Q. What's unclear about the question?
` A. You're using "synchronization" without any
`definition.
` Q. Okay. Well, you provided a definition of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
`"synchronization," I believe, in your expert report.
` Is that right?
` A. That's right.
` Q. I believe it's at paragraph 32?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Using the definition of "synchronized"
`that you provided at paragraph 32 of your
`declaration, would you agree that synchronizing data
`between a database and a web server was known at the
`time of the '850 patent?
` MR. OSBORNE: Object again; that's
` outside the scope of direct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. And would you agree that synchronizing
`data between a database and a wireless device was
`known at the time of the '850 patent?
` MR. OSBORNE: The same objection.
` A. Your question leaves a lot of details
`unanswered.
` So I find it hard to answer your
`question.
` Q. Are there any particular details that you
`would need?
` A. You know -- what kind of data?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. Any kind of data.
` A. Any kind of data?
` Well, then I don't know the answer to
`that question.
` Q. You don't know whether synchronizing data
`between a database and a wireless device was known
`in the art at the time of the patent?
` A. That wasn't your question.
` Q. Okay. Well, let me rephrase.
` Was synchronizing data between a
`database and a wireless device known in the art at
`the time of the filing of the '850 patent?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. Because you didn't define "data," I don't
`know how to answer your question.
` Q. What does "data" mean to you?
` A. Well, you said "all data."
` So I don't know how to answer the
`question of synchronizing "all data" -- which I
`believe to be your question.
` Q. Well, let me see if I can clarify a little
`bit.
` A. Certainly.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 33
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Q. Was synchronizing data between a database
`and a wireless device -- strike that.
` Was synchronizing any type of data
`between a database and a wireless device known at
`the time of the filing of the '850 patent?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` Q. And by "any type of data," I mean data
`stored in the database.
` A. Yes. There exists data that could be
`synchronized between a database and a wireless
`device.
` Q. And techniques for synchronizing data
`between the database and a wireless device were
`known at the time of the filing of the '850 patent.
`Correct?
` MR. OSBORNE: Objection; outside the
` scope of direct.
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Let's turn back to your
`declaration, Weaver Exhibit 1.
` In paragraph 11 and 12, you identify
`materials that you reviewed in preparation for this
`declaration.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`(877) 702-9580
`
`Apple Inc, Exhibit 1076
`
`

`
`Page 34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` WEAVER
` Is that correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And in paragraph 11, you state that you
`reviewed, among other things, the references cited
`by Starbucks in the CBM reviews.
` I take it that was a typo,
`"Starbucks"?
` A. No.
` Q. Okay. You didn't intend to state that you
`reviewed the re

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket