throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE INC., EVENTBRITE INC., STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
`WORLDWIDE, INC., EXPEDIA, INC., FANDANGO, LLC,
`HOTELS.COM, L.P., HOTEL TONIGHT, INC., HOTWIRE, INC.,
`KAYAK SOFTWARE CORP., OPENTABLE, INC., ORBITZ, LLC, PAPA
`JOHN’S USA, INC., STUBHUB, INC., TICKETMASTER, LLC, LIVE
`NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC., TRAVELOCITY.COM LP,
`WANDERSPOT LLC, AGILYSYS, INC., DOMINO’S PIZZA, INC.,
`DOMINO’S PIZZA, LLC, HILKTON RESORTS CORPORATION,
`HILTON WORLDWIDE, INC., HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., MOBO
`SYSTEMS, INC., PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA, INC., PIZZA HUT, INC.,
`and USABLENET, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`AMERANTH, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case CBM CBM2015-000801
`Patent 6,384,850
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS SUBMITTED WITH
`PATENT OWNER’S RESPONSE
`
`
`
`
`1 CBM2015-00096 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`

`
`
`
`Per 37 C.F.R. § 42.64, Petitioner hereby objects to exhibits submitted by
`
`Patent Owner with its Response, exhibits designated by Patent Owner as Exhibit
`
`Nos. 2021-2023 and 2025-2056.
`
`
`
`The ground for objection are as follows:
`
`Patent Owner Exhibit
`No.
`Exhibits 2021
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Grounds for Objection
`
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`1
`
`

`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2028
`
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`2
`
`

`
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`Exhibit 2032
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`
`3
`
`

`
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`Exhibit 2036
`
`Exhibit 2037
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`4
`
`

`
`Exhibit 2038
`
`Exhibit 2039
`
`Exhibit 2040
`
`Exhibit 2041
`
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`5
`
`

`
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`
`Exhibit 2042
`
`Exhibit 2043
`
`Exhibit 2044
`
`Exhibit 2045
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`6
`
`

`
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`
`Exhibit 2046
`
`Exhibit 2047
`
`Exhibit 2048
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`7
`
`

`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`
`Exhibit 2049
`
`Exhibit 2050
`
`Exhibit 2051
`
`Exhibit 2052
`
`Exhibit 2053
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`8
`
`

`
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Relevance. Fed. R. Evid. 401-403. This exhibit is not
`relevant to any issue in this CBM proceeding, and any
`probative value of the exhibit is substantially outweighed
`by unfair prejudice and a waste of time, particularly
`because it is not cited in Patent Owner’s Response.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Authentication. Fed. R. Evid. 901(a). Patent Owner has
`not produced evidence sufficient to support a finding that
`this exhibit is a true and correct copy of what Patent
`Owner purports it to be.
`
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`Hearsay. Fed. R. Evid. 801(c). To the extent Patent
`Owner relies on this exhibit to prove the truth of matters
`described therein, the statements are hearsay. Patent
`Owner has not offered evidence sufficient to demonstrate
`that the exhibit falls within any exceptions to the rule
`against hearsay.
`
`Exhibit 2054
`
`Exhibit 2055
`
`Exhibit 2056
`
`
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
` /James M. Heintz/
`James M. Heintz
`Registration Number 41,828
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`11911 Freedom Drive, Suite 300
`Reston, VA 20190
`(703) 773-4148
`
`Robert C. Williams
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`401 B Street Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`(619) 699-2820
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WEST\267404697.1
`
`10
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`
`
`
`
`Objections to Exhibits Submitted With Patent Owner’s Response were served on
`
`January 13, 2016, via electronic mail, per agreement of the parties, to counsel for
`
`the following addresses:
`
`
`
`John W. Osborne
`OSBORNE LAW LLC
`33 Habitat Lane
`Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567
`Tel.: 914-714-5936
`Fax: 914-734-7333
`josborne@osborneipl.com
`
`Richard S. Zembek
`FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP
`1301 McKinney, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77010
`Tel.: 713-651-5151
`Fax: 713-651-5246
`richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`
`Michael D. Fabiano
`FABIANO LAW FIRM, P.C.
`12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel.: 619-742-9631
`mdfabiano@fabianolawfirm.com
`
`Gilbert A. Greene
`FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP
`98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1100
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel.: 512-474-5201
`Fax: 512-536-4598
`bert.greene@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
` /James M. Heintz/
`James M. Heintz
`
`Reg. No. 41,828
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`1
`
`WEST\267404697.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket