throbber
PATENT OWNER
`PATENT OWNER
`
`EXHIBIT 2039
`EXHIBIT 2039
`
`
`
`

`
`

`
`Chipotle Mexican Grill
`
`Frank Daidone
`Director of Infrastructure and
`Compliance
`
`

`
`Chipotle Mexican Grill
`• Burritos, Tacos, Bowls & Salads
`• Approximately 850 restaurants
`• Food with Integrity
`
`

`
`Chipotle Mexican Grill
`
`Online Ordering & POS Integration: Is
`It Worth the Trouble?
`1.Integration
`2.Effort (Trouble)
`3.Worth
`
`

`
`Thank You
`
`Thank You
`
`

`
`

`
`Online Ordering & POS Integration:
`Is It Worth the Trouble?
`
`Paul Valle
`CIO
`Papa Gino’s, Inc.
`
`

`
`Papa Gino’s & D’Angelo
`
`• Two dominant New England brands established in the 1960’s
`
`• Over 5,500 employees
`
`• 370 owned and franchised restaurants
`
`• 40 districts, 6 regions
`
`• Considered mid-market
`
`

`
`Implementation Process
`• After an extensive search for a technology solution, we chose
`ONOSYS Online Ordering
`• First few months were occupied with implementing broadband
`services at all restaurants
`• Shortly thereafter, we prototyped both concepts.
`• Rather than go live at that point, we chose to spend the next 3
`months integrating the ONOSYS system directly into our home-
`grown POS system
`• Our reasoning behind full integration included:
`– order accuracy, reduced labor, live updating of lead/promise times
`– order process confirmation
`
`

`
`Results
`
`• Papa Gino’s began live rollout on 8/18 with full rollout by 9/8
`• D’Angelo began live rollout on 9/22 with full rollout by 10/3
`• Shortly after rollout, we began an email marketing campaign to
`promote products and specials and attract new business
`• Average ticket for web orders is up 73.5% over phone-in orders
`• Web orders account for 3.5% of all sales and is growing steadily
`• Approximately 4,000 new guests create a web account per week
`
`

`
`Thanks!!!
`
`

`
`

`
`Online Ordering & POS
`Integration:
`Is It Worth the Trouble?
`
`Mark Nance
`Director eCommerce Application Development
`
`

`
`Papa John’s Online
`
`•National Online Ordering
`–Approx. 2700 domestic restaurants integrated with our POS since 2001.
`–Internally developed and maintained.
`
`•Online now represents more than 20% of all sales.
`
`•In 2008 we surpassed $1 billion in cumulative sales.
`
`•Four(4) ordering channels leverage the online platform.
`–Online, Mobile Web, SMS Text, Widgets
`
`

`
`Key POS Integration Points
`
`•Order Integration
`
`•Menu, Pricing & Coupons
`
`•Store Maintenance
`–Payments, hours, inventory
`
`

`
`Integration Points
`
`•Orders placed directly to the ‘Makeline’.
`–No faxes or IP Printers.
`•Daily ‘AutoSync’ to load menus, prices, taxes and hours.
`–Pricing, taxes, payments are all handled online.
`•Coupons & promotion codes are centrally managed.
`–Operators manage updates through the support center.
`•Manual methods for ‘on demand’ updates.
`–Temp out of inventory, unplanned closures, order cancellations etc.
`
`

`
`Considerations
`
`•Volume levels determine short and long term solutions.
`–The more orders, the more important to integrate with the POS to ensure
`the store can better control the order.
`•Integration may still require a manual/backup solution
`–E.g. connectivity issues, desired level of customer service, overhead
`pricing.
`•Restaurant level ownership and buy in is critical.
`•Integration may also mean new business processes.
`–You can’t easily automate a process that doesn’t have a manual processt
`(e.g. custom orders, deals etc)
`–Standard inventory items and products.
`
`

`
`Thanks!!!
`
`Thanksu!

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket