throbber
DTE Power Via MDI – 5 Criteria
`
`1) Broad Market Potential
`
`- Broad set(s) of applications:
`The following areas have been identified as potentially benefiting from power over MDI:
`•
`IP Telephony
`• Web Cameras
`• Wireless Access Points
`•
`Industrial Automation
`• Home Automation
`• Security Access Control and Monitoring Systems
`• Point of Sale Terminals
`• Lighting Control
`• Gaming and Entertainment Equipment
`• Building Management
`
`- Multiple vendors, multiple users.
`At the Call for Interest, 44 individuals from 34 companies supported this initiative, and 20
`organizations stated an intention to work on the development of such a standard. Support for
`power via MDI has been requested by TIA/EIA TR-41.3.4 and TR-41.4. IEEE 802.11 has
`expressed interest in such a standard. There are existing proprietary and other potentially
`conflicting standard solutions (e.g. I.430) in the market. The goal of the standard is to reduce the
`issue of interoperability in the powered LAN market.
`
`- Balanced cost, LAN vs. attached stations.
`For some markets the cost of providing AC power is a barrier to the use of a LAN solution.
`Having a standard MDI power source brings a balance of cost in providing power to a level
`consistent with the silicon and applications.
`
`2) Compatibility with IEEE Standard 802.3
`
`- Conformance with CSMA/CD MAC, PLS.
`It is our intention to be compatible with 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX UTP, and do no harm to
`1000BASE-T, with no changes to the existing MAC.
`
`- Conformance with 802.2.
`There will be no changes to the current MAC client interface.
`
`- Conformance with 802 Functional Requirements.
`The proposed standard will conform to the 802 Functional Requirements.
`
`3) Distinct Identity
`
`- Substantially different from other 802.3 specifications/ solutions.
`No existing 802 standard or project addresses power.
`
`- Unique solution for problem (not two alternatives per problem).
`Only a single powering technique will be standardized. There will not be multiple alternatives.
`
`- Easy for document reader to select relevant spec.
`The specification will be added to the 802.3 standard as a new clause.
`
`SONY EXHIBIT 1014
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

` 4) Technical Feasibility
`
`- Demonstrated feasibility, reports - - working models.
`A draft for P802.9f proposed methodologies that would address powering via an MDI. There are
`existing proprietary solutions in the market; however, they may not meet all of the objectives of
`this proposed project.
`
`- Proven technology; reasonable testing.
`This will be addressed as part of the project.
`
`- Confidence in reliability.
`This will be addressed as part of the project.
`
`5) Economic Feasibility
`
`- Cost factors known, reliable data.
`This will be addressed as part of the project. Power supply and distribution are mature
`technologies and the cost factors well understood.
`
`- Reasonable cost for performance expected.
`The objective is to lower the total cost of ownership. This will be an enabler to numerous new
`classes of “network appliances.”
`
`- Total installation cost considered.
`An objective is to lower the total cost of installation.
`
`Agree: 36, Oppose: 0, Abstain: 0 - Technical
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket