throbber
Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`
` EASTERN DIVISION
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES )
`
`INTERNATIONAL, INC., )
`
` Plaintiff, )
`
` vs. ) No. 05-cv-4811
`
`CQG, INC. and CQGT, LLC, )
`
` Defendants. )
`
`
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
`
` OF
`
` JOHN PHILLIP MELLOR, PH.D.
`
` January 16, 2015
`
`Reported By:
`
`Juliana F. Zajicek
`
`Ref: 13116
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2068
`CQG & CQGT v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2015-00058
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`Page 38
`
`Page 40
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`trader, correct?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. That's not correct. That's, I think,
`that's exactly what I described in my report here
`is that I did have an understanding of -- of
`electronic trading and trading in general and I
`think I have an extensive background in graphical
`user interfaces. And the combination of those two
`things, I think it's very straight forward to
`understand what the needs of an electronic trader
`are.
` Q. Just based on knowing how to design a
`graphical user interface, is that what you are
`saying, if you know how to design a graphical user
`interface, then by definition you know the needs of
`a professional electronic trader?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. That's not what I said. I said
`understanding -- having a basic understanding of
`trading and electronic trading and the graphical
`user interface background, that together is
`sufficient.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`interface, that's a different matter.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. But you agree that you are not an
`expert in electronic trading?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I'm not exactly sure what your
`definition of an expert in electronic trading is,
`but depending on what that -- what your definition
`is, I'm not sure that I would consider myself an
`expert in electronic trading.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. You know a Chris Thomas, right?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I've met him briefly, yes.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. Have you looked at his expert
`report?
` A. I have.
` Q. Have you looked at his qualifications?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I have.
`
`Page 39
`
`Page 41
`
`BY MR. GANNON:
`1
` Q. Okay. You are not a professional
`2
`electronic trader yourself, correct?
`3
` A. No, I am not.
`4
` Q. And you've had no experience as a
`5
`professional electronic trader, correct?
`6
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`7
`BY THE WITNESS:
`8
` A. That is correct.
`9
`BY MR. GANNON:
`10
` Q. You've' never traded on an electronic
`11
`exchange, correct?
`12
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`13
`BY THE WITNESS:
`14
` A. That's correct.
`15
`BY MR. GANNON:
`16
` Q. You are not an expert in electronic
`17
`trading, correct?
`18
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`19
`BY THE WITNESS:
`20
` A. I would not say that I'm an expert in
`21
`electronic trading, but I understand the needs of a
`22
`trader as it relates to the issues in this case,
`23
`24 which is the matter here is a graphical user
`
`BY MR. GANNON:
`1
` Q. Would it be fair to say that Mr. Thomas
`2
`has more experience than you in the field of
`3
`electronic trading?
`4
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`5
`BY MR. GANNON:
`6
` Q. Is that a fair statement?
`7
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`8
`BY THE WITNESS:
`9
` A. Perhaps. It depends on how you define
`10
`the field of electronic trading.
`11
`BY MR. GANNON:
`12
` Q. Well, how do you define the field of
`13
`electronic trading?
`14
` MR. VOLLER: Form, relevance.
`15
`BY THE WITNESS:
`16
` A. I'm not sure I have a definition sitting
`17
`here.
`18
`BY MR. GANNON:
`19
` Q. Well, let me ask -- let me ask you this
`20
`21 way:
` Why does it depend on how you define the
`22
`field of electronic trading? What do you mean by
`23
`that?
`24
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`11 (Pages 38 to 41)
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`Page 42
`
`Page 44
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. Well, I think I'm just trying to
`understand the question and be able to make a --
`you know, give you an honest -- you know, an honest
`answer about what I think.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Well, I asked you, "Would it be fair to
`say that Mr. Thomas has more experience than you in
`the field of electronic trading?" And you said,
`"Perhaps. It depends on how you define the field
`of electronic trading."
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Do you see that?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. Do I see that?
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Did you testify to that? Is that a fair
`statement?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I think it's -- it sounds like what I
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
` A. I did.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. And you're familiar with the
`patents in this case, right?
` A. I am.
` Q. I mean, you rendered an opinion on the
`patents, right?
` A. I did.
` Q. And you spent a lot of time analyzing
`the patents, right?
` A. I did.
` Q. And your testimony is the patents relate
`to the field of electronic trading, correct?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I did say that they are related.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. So using that definition of the
`field of electronic trading, wouldn't it be fair to
`say that Mr. Thomas has more experience than you in
`the field of electronic trading?
` MR. VOLLER: Form, asked and answered.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. I'm -- again, I'm still a little -- I'm
`
`Page 43
`
`Page 45
`
`said.
`1
`BY MR. GANNON:
`2
` Q. Do the patents-in-suit relate to the
`3
`field of electronic trading?
`4
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`5
`BY THE WITNESS:
`6
` A. I think it would be fair to say that
`7
`they relate to electronic trading.
`8
`BY MR. GANNON:
`9
` Q. Okay. With that understanding then,
`10
`11 would it be fair to say that Mr. Thomas has more
`experience than you in the field of electronic
`12
`trading?
`13
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`14
`BY THE WITNESS:
`15
` A. I'm not -- I'm not sure how that
`16
`relates, helps me answer the question, so I'm
`17
`having trouble sorting that out.
`18
`BY MR. GANNON:
`19
` Q. Well, you said the field of electronic
`20
`trading -- or the patents relate to the field of
`21
`electronic trading, right?
`22
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`23
`BY THE WITNESS:
`24
`
`not understanding what you're asking. You know,
`1
`the field of electronic trading is very broad.
`2
`There is a lot of stuff in it. Not all of that
`3
`seems to be applicable to the patents-in-suit, and
`4
`so that's what I'm having trouble kind of trying to
`5
`parse and understand how that relates.
`6
`BY MR. GANNON:
`7
` Q. Would it be fair to say that Mr. Thomas
`8
`has more experience than you in the field of
`9
`graphical user interfaces for electronic trading?
`10
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`11
`BY THE WITNESS:
`12
` A. I'm not sure that would be a fair
`13
`characterization.
`14
`BY MR. GANNON:
`15
` Q. Why not?
`16
` A. Because I think that the underlying
`17
`technology is the graphical user interface, there
`18
`are -- you know, every graphical user interface
`19
`application has sort of needs and goals and I have
`20
`extensive experience in graphical user interfaces.
`21
`22 And as I sort of detail in my report, it's over my
`career there have been numerous instances where
`23
`I've been asked to create a graphical user
`24
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`12 (Pages 42 to 45)
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`Page 46
`
`Page 48
`
`interface in a domain that I had no prior
`1
`experience.
`2
` Q. And what domain was that? Because I
`3
`4 meant to ask you about that. You mentioned you
`design GUIs in other areas. What other areas?
`5
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`6
`BY THE WITNESS:
`7
` A. Well, they're -- they are cataloged in
`8
`9 my expert report, but there is a number of those.
`I've built graphical user interfaces for
`10
`helicopters, I've built graphical user interfaces
`11
`for human computer interaction, graphical user
`12
`interfaces for insurance adjustment, using
`13
`satellite photographs. There is a number of others
`14
`and they are detailed in my report.
`15
`BY MR. GANNON:
`16
` Q. Okay. The graphical user interface you
`17
`designed -- did you say for a helicopter?
`18
` A. That's correct.
`19
` Q. Is that graphical user interface being
`20
`used in a helicopter, do you know?
`21
` A. That is correct.
`22
` Q. Which helicopter?
`23
` A. CH-47 Chinook helicopters.
`24
`
`know how to fly a helicopter, but I still built
`1
`that graphical user interface and it is in use.
`2
` Q. And when you built it, though, you did
`3
`have to understand the needs of a pilot, the
`4
`helicopter pilot at some point, right?
`5
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`6
`BY THE WITNESS:
`7
` A. As I -- as I described, over the course
`8
`of building it, I certainly learned of some -- I
`9
`discovered things about the helicopter pilots and
`10
`11 what they do, yes.
`BY MR. GANNON:
`12
` Q. Okay. So when you designed the
`13
`graphical user interface for the helicopter, I
`14
`presume you talked to pilots who were helicopter
`15
`pilots, professional helicopter pilots?
`16
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`17
`BY THE WITNESS:
`18
` A. No, actually, I did not.
`19
`BY MR. GANNON:
`20
` Q. What does the graphical user interface
`21
`do in the helicopter that you designed?
`22
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`23
`BY THE WITNESS:
`24
`
`Page 47
`
`Page 49
`
` Q. When you designed that graphical user
`1
`interface, did you need to get up to speed on the
`2
`need of a helicopter pilot or did you -- or did
`3
`that not matter?
`4
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`5
`BY THE WITNESS:
`6
` A. Well, over the course of building that
`7
`graphical user interface, I certainly learned
`8
`about, you know, sort of the needs of -- of pilots.
`9
`10 Most of the concerns, I think, were pretty straight
`forward.
`11
`BY MR. GANNON:
`12
` Q. But it was a -- strike that.
`13
` It was important to understand the needs
`14
`of a helicopter pilot prior to designing a GUI for
`15
`the helicopter, right?
`16
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`17
`BY THE WITNESS:
`18
` A. I don't think that's what I said. I
`19
`said over the course of constructing it.
`20
`BY MR. GANNON:
`21
` Q. I'm sorry.
`22
` A. So I didn't -- I didn't know anything
`23
`about the heli- -- a helicopter pilot and nor do I
`24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
` A. It includes the primary flight displays
`and mission displays.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. And I -- is that important to be able to
`fly the helicopter?
` MR. VOLLER: Form.
`BY THE WITNESS:
` A. It is safety critical.
`BY MR. GANNON:
` Q. Okay. What do you mean "safety
`critical"?
` A. Well, there are some pretty stringent
`rules about how software for safety critical
`systems are built and there's -- there is a
`classification, there is sort of five different
`levels of classification, and it -- there are a
`variety of processes that you need to follow to get
`sort of final approval, final certification for the
`software. Level A software is sort of the highest
`level of criticality, and so those -- those
`portions of the software are designated Level A
`because if that software system were to fail or
`give an incorrect or improper indication, it could
`result in loss of life.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`13 (Pages 46 to 49)
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket