throbber
DECLARATION OF DAVID F. ANmONY
`
`I, David F. Anthony, declare that:
`
`I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a witness,
`1.
`I could and would testify thereto of my own personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`I reside in Wheaton, Illinois.
`
`I have been trading futures for over 10 years. I started trading on the floor of the
`3.
`Chicago Board of Trade ( .. CBOT") in around 1993. I left the floor in June of 1999 while
`Project A (the CBOT's first electronic trading system) was still being launched. As more
`volume started to trade electronically, I started transitioning to trading electronically.
`
`In the fall of 2000, I saw IT's MD Trader for the first time. At the time, I was
`4.
`familiar with various platforms for electronic trading that were available. When I saw
`Tf's MD Trader, I thought it was superior to the other platforms I had seen and I decided
`to license IT's software. I made this decision despite the fact that TI' s software was
`more expensive than the alternatives. My decision to choose TT was based primarily on
`the fact that it had MD Trader.
`
`MD Trader was superior for at least several reasons. Unlike other systems
`5.
`available at the time, MD Trader allowed for a trader to enter an order at a particular
`price with one click and with confidence that the order would be sent at the intended
`price. This was so because MD Trader allowed for a trader to enter orders by clicking on
`cells aligned with a fixed range of prices. Also unlike other systems at tbe time, MD
`Trader created a view of the market information that substantially reduced the mental
`effort needed by the trader to interpret the market data. In particular, MD Trader
`displayed the market information against the fixed range of prices such that the market
`data visually moved up and down relative to the prices. The other systems available at
`the time presented price changes to the trader by numbers changing such that the trader
`had to notice the change and mentally calculate the difference. MD Trader also provided
`a recentering feature that did not exist in the other systems I was aware of at the time that
`allowed a trader to easily (with one click) bring the market into the center of the MD
`Trader window. This feature was also valuable because it allowed the trader to create a
`point of reference against which to view the market data going forward.
`
`Overall, compared to the other systems that existed at the lime of its release, MD
`6.
`. Trader provided a more efficient and easier to use trading tool. These differences
`changed the way electronic trading was done. The features discussed above allow for a
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2031
`CQG & CQGT v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2015-00058
`
`

`

`trader to be more aggressive and more confident. This translates into a trader reacting to
`opportunities faster and entering orders faster. Today, if a trader does not have a trading
`tool with the features of MD Trader, that trader is at a significant disadvantage. Because
`of it simplicity and ease of use, MD Trader also results in traders sending more orders
`than they would with older style screens.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July
`~.2004.
`
`David F. Anthony
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket