throbber
DECLARATION OF STEVEN JANHO
`
`I, Steven Janho, declare that:
`
`I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a witness,
`1.
`I could and would testify thereto of my own personal knowledge.
`
`I began trading futures in 1998 on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade
`2.
`("CBOT"). I was around for the birth of Project A (the CBOT's first electronic trading
`system) and traded on that system at night in 1998. I became a customer of TT and
`started using MD Trader to trade electronically right around the time of the launch of MD
`Trader (around September of 2000). I currently trade electronically at 607 E. Illinois,
`Wheaton, Illinois.
`
`3.
`At the time I first started using MD Trader, I had tried a couple of other front-end
`systems for electronic trading. I liked and choose TT' s software because I thought MD
`Trader was better. The other systems I was aware of had nothing like MD Trader. In
`particular, in MD Trader the display was constructed by displaying market information
`against a vertical column of fixed prices. This allowed the trader to visualize market
`movements and compare the current level of the market with a point of reference. This
`was different than other systems at the time which displayed the market information in a
`grid format with fixed cells for the best bid price and best ask price. In these other
`systems. when the market changed the prices on the screen changed. MD Trader also
`allowed a trader to click on individual cells and very easily enter orders at the aligned
`price levels knowing that the order would go in at that price. This was different than
`other systems at the time in which if a trader attempted to click on a price he ran the risk
`of that price changing and the order going in at a different price. MD Trader also had a
`one click recentering feature that I had not seen in other systems at the time.
`
`4.
`MD Trader enhanced the ability of a trader to trade effectively. This was so
`because the more intuitive display of information reduced the reaction time of a trader by
`reducing the extent of mental calculations required by the other systems. In the other
`systems, if the market changed the trader needed to recognize the fact that the prices in
`the best bid and/or best ask cells changed and to mentally calculate the extent to which
`they changed. These mental calculations are unnecessary in MD Trader where a trader
`can just visually see that the market has changed and the extent of that movement. MD
`Trader's improved order entry also reduces errors and increases the confidence of the
`trader. The one click recentering feature of MD Trader was also very valuable because it
`allowed a trader to easily and quickly bring the market back to the center of the screen if
`it has run off of the screen. Recentering also permits a trader to create a point of
`reference against which to view the market data going forward.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2042
`CQG & CQGT v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2015-00057
`
`

`
`All of these features allow a trader to make decisions faster and enter o.-ders
`5.
`faster. In electronic trading, speed is critical to the success of a trader and any tool that
`can enhance that speed, such as MD Trader, is invaluable.
`
`I declare under penalty of pe.tjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July
`
`<; -e:-· 2004.
`
`sre~1-
`
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket