`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`Civil Action No. 05-CV-4811
`
`Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman
`
`Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`CQG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE ’304 AND ’132 PATENTS
`ARE INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 FOR LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION
`CQG moves for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 for invalidity of U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 6,766,304 ((cid:147)the (cid:146)304 patent(cid:148)) and 6,772,132 ((cid:147)the (cid:146)132 patent(cid:148)) for lack of written
`
`description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1.
`
`The undisputed facts recited in CQG(cid:146)s Statement of Material Facts under Local Rule 56.1
`
`establish that the inventors were only in possession of a price column where all displayed prices
`
`are static. Because the specification fails to support TT(cid:146)s assertion that the Static Limitation
`
`covers price column where only some of the displayed prices are static. The claims of the (cid:146)304
`
`patent and the (cid:146)132 patent are invalid for failing to meeting the written description requirement
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1.
`
`WHEREFORE, CQG moves for summary judgment in its favor of invalidity of the (cid:146)304
`
`and (cid:146)132 patents under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1. The attached memorandum, statement of material
`
`facts, and exhibits, which are incorporated by reference and filed contemporaneously, provide a
`
`more detailed description of invalidity due to a lack of written description.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2010
`CQG & CQGT v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2015-00057
`
`
`
`Case: 1:05-cv-04811 Document #: 709 Filed: 03/17/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:17976
`
`
`Dated: March 17, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ William J. Voller III
`
`Adam G. Kelly
`
`William Voller III
`
`J. Simone Jones
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`321 North Clark, Suite 2300
`Chicago, Illinois 60654
`(312) 464-3100 Telephone
`(312) 464-3111 Facsimile
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
`CQG, INC. and CQGT, LLC
`
`2
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Case: 1:05-cv-04811 Document #: 709 Filed: 03/17/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:17977
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, William J. Voller III, certify that a copy of CQG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`
`JUDGMENT THAT THE ’304 AND ’132 PATENTS ARE INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. §
`112, ¶ 1 FOR LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION was served via the ECF filing system upon
`the following on the 17th day of March, 2014:
`
`Steven F. Borsand
`(Steve.Borsand@tradingtechnologies.com)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`222 South Riverside
`Suite 1100
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`
`
`
`/s/ William J. Voller III
`
`LOEB & LOEB LLP
`321 North Clark Street, Suite 2300
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (312) 464-3100
`
`Attorneys for CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC
`
`
`Matthew J. Sampson
`(sampson@mbhb.com)
`S. Richard Carden
`(carden@mbhb.com)
`Jennifer M. Kurcz
`(kurcz@mbhb.com)
`Andrea K. Orth
`(orth@mbhb.com)
`Brandon J. Kennedy
`(kennedy@mbhb.com)
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`
`
`
`March 17, 2014
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`