PTAB

Search for cases ...

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

Information

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Click below for detailed party information:

Petitioner

WTS PARADIGM, LLC.

Patent Owner

EdgeAQ, LLC

alt+h	Toggle this page.
alt+u	Toggle Upcoming Events view.
alt+e	Export the docket to Excel.
Filtering / Searching the Docket
ctrl+f	Filter the docket.
ctrl+shift+f	Search docket and documents.
alt+s	Toggle between "Show Only" filtering modes.
alt+d, ctrl+f	System ctrl+f
escape	Clear while in docket filter.
Interactive Timeline
alt+t	Show / re-center case timeline.
alt+↑	Zoom in
alt+↓	Zoom out
alt+←	Pan left
alt+→	Pan right

WTS PARADIGM, LLC. v. EdgeAQ, LLC

CBM2015-00054 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.

Filed Jan. 7, 2015

Judges Beth Shaw, Christopher Crumbley, and Trevor Jefferson

Case Type Covered Business Method Patent Review

Status Terminated

Challenged Patent 10/669,465

Patent No. 7,461,049 assignments

Tech Center 2100

Last Updated: 3 years, 9 months ago

Filing Date	#	Filing and Exhibits
Entries matching. Show All.
7/1/2016	07-01-2016-Board	Event: Motion to Terminate (Granted) Board Termination - Settlement After Institution 20: Judgment - Termination of Proceeding - 35 USC 327(a) - 37 CFR 42.72
6/28/2016	06-28-2016-Petitioner	Petitioner Motion 19: Joint Motion to Terminate Covered Business Method Patent Review Petitioner Exhibit 1025: Settlement Agreement
4/5/2016	04-05-2016-Board	Board Order 18: Order - Trial Hearing
1/5/2016	01-05-2016-Board	Board Order 17: Order Conduct of the Proceeding
12/31/2015	12-31-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Reply 16: Reply to Motion to Withdraw Patent Owner Exhibit 2012: Ex. 2012-Declaration of Andrew Crain in Support of Reply to Motion to Withdraw
12/17/2015	12-17-2015-Petitioner	Petitioner Opposition 15: Petitioner's Opposition to Motion for Withdrawal from Representation of Patent Owner Petitioner Exhibit 1016: Declaration of Anthony A. Tomaselli Petitioner Exhibit 1017: Excerpts from Patent Owner's First Amended Complaint in TN Litigation Petitioner Exhibit 1018: Excerpts from Answer in TN Litigation Petitioner Exhibit 1019: Excerpts from Answer in WI Litigation Petitioner Exhibit 1020: June 19, 2015 Letter Petitioner Exhibit 1021: Rule 11 Motion Petitioner Exhibit 1022: Covenant Not to Sue Petitioner Exhibit 1023: April 30, 2015 Letter Petitioner Exhibit 1024: May 20, 2015 Letter
12/11/2015	12-11-2015-Board	Board Order 14: Order - Motion to Withdraw Counsel - 37 CFR 42.10(e)
12/10/2015	12-10-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Motion 11: Motion for Withdrawal from Representation of Patent Owner Patent Owner Notice 12: Patent Owner's Updated Mandatory Notices Patent Owner Power of Attorney 13: Power of Attorney
12/3/2015	12-03-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Notice 10: Patent Owener's Updated Mandatory Notices
11/3/2015	11-03-2015-Patent_Owner	Patent Owner Opposition 9: Patent Owner Response and Opposition to Petition Request
8/3/2015	08-03-2015-Board	Event: Petition Institution (Granted) Board Decision Granting Institution 7: Decision Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Board Order 8: Scheduling Order
5/5/2015	05-05-2015-Patent_Owner	Event: Preliminary Response Patent Owner Preliminary Response 6: Preliminary Response by Patent Owner Patent Owner Exhibit 2001: Screen Capture of m2o Product Page Patent Owner Exhibit 2002: Screen Capture of CenterPoint Product Page Patent Owner Exhibit 2003: US Patent Application No. 2013/0018850 Patent Owner Exhibit 2004: File History of '049 Patent Patent Owner Exhibit 2005: Congressional Record for the America Invents Act Patent Owner Exhibit 2006: Response filed March 15, 2015 (13/365,765) Patent Owner Exhibit 2007: WO 2013/016009A1 Patent Owner Exhibit 2008: WO 2012/106626A3 Patent Owner Exhibit 2009: Google Patents Search Results (interactive customization or configuration) Patent Owner Exhibit 2010: Google Patents Search Results (hierarchical structure) Patent Owner Exhibit 2011: Declaration of Kenneth A. Knox, Esq.
2/5/2015	02-05-2015-Board	Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition 5: Notice of According of Filing Date
1/27/2015	01-27-2015-Patent_Owner	Potential Patent Owner Power of Attorney 3: Power of Attorney Potential Patent Owner Notice 4: Related Matters
1/7/2015	01-07-2015-Petitioner	Event: Petition Petitioner Petition 1: Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review of USPatent No 7,461,049 Under 35 USC 321 and 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Petitioner Power of Attorney 2: Power of Attorney Petitioner Exhibit 1001: Declaration of Deborah McGuinness Petitioner Exhibit 1002: Curriculum Vitae of Deborah McGuinness Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Declaration of Martha Jahn Snyder Petitioner Exhibit 1003: Corrected Declaration of Martha Jahn Snyder Petitioner Exhibit 1004: US Patent No. 7,461,049 Petitioner Exhibit 1005: July 3, 2007 - Resubmission of Appeal Brief from the File History of US Patent No. 7,461,049 Petitioner Exhibit 1006: Alison Cawsey, The Essence of Artificial Intelligence (1998) Petitioner Exhibit 1007: John McDermott, R1, an Expert in the Computer Systems Domain (1980) Petitioner Exhibit 1008: Soloway, et al., Assessing the Maintainability of XCON-in-RIME - Coping with the Problems of a VERY Large Rule-Base (1987) Petitioner Exhibit 1009: Marvin Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge (1974) Petitioner Exhibit 1010: Wright, et al., A Knowledge-Based Configurator That Supports Sales, Engineering, and Manufacturing at ATT Network Systems (1993) Petitioner Exhibit 1011: Andersen Corp., A Complete Guide to Andersen Windows and Patio Doors (1995) Petitioner Exhibit 1012: US Patent No. 4,999,786 Petitioner Exhibit 1013: Fikes, et al., The Role of Frame Based Representation in Reasoning, Communication of the ACM (1985) Petitioner Exhibit 1014: US Patent No. 5,293,479 Petitioner Exhibit 1015: US Patent No. 6,081,786

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Fed Courts
For-pay state court docs

$39.99/mo.

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Search millions of cases and get court filings, fast docket alerts, and case analytics.

Request a Demo or create your account.

Lawyer? Your firm may have a group account, ask us and we'll let you know.

Petitioner

Patent Owner

Keyboard shortcuts

Filtering / Searching the Docket

Interactive Timeline

WTS PARADIGM, LLC. v. EdgeAQ, LLC

CBM2015-00054 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Interested in this case?

Event:

Event:

Event:

Event:

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go Monthly

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases