throbber
·case ():14-cv-60830-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2014 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`LEON ST AMBLER,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MASTERCARD IN CORPORA TED (d/b/a
`MASTERCARD WORLDWIDE) and
`MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL
`IN CORPORA TED,
`
`Defendants.
`










`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. - - -
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff LEON ST AMBLER files this Original Complaint against the above-named
`
`Defendants, alleging as follows:
`
`I. THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff LEON STAMBLER ("Stambler") is an individual residing in Parkland,
`
`Florida.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant MASTERCARD INCORPORATED (d/b/a MasterCard Worldwide) is
`
`a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Purchase, New York. This
`
`Defendant may be served with process through its registered agent, The Corporation Trust
`
`Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant MASTERCARD
`
`INTERNATIONAL
`
`INCORPORATED 1s a
`
`Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Purchase, New York. This
`
`Defendant may be served with process through its registered agent, The Corporation Trust
`
`Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
`
`MasterCard, Exh. 1002, p. 1
`
`

`
`Case 0:14-cv-60830-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2014 Page 2 of 4.
`
`II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, and
`
`284-285, among others. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action under Title 28
`
`U.S.C. §1331 and §1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`The Court has general and specific personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and
`
`venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b). On information and belief, (i)
`
`Defendants have substantial contacts with the forum as a result of pervasive business activities
`
`conducted within the State of Florida and within this District; (ii) Defendants regularly solicit
`
`business in Florida and in this District, and derive substantial revenue from products, systems,
`
`and/or services provided to individuals or entities residing in Florida and in this District; (iii)
`
`Defendants provide secure funds transfer services to and/or engage in the infringing encrypted
`
`communications directly with customers in this District; and (iv) Defendants conduct business
`
`relating to secure funds transfer services in Florida and in this District.
`
`III. PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5.793,302
`
`6.
`
`On August 11, 1998, United States Patent No. 5,793,302 ("the '302 patent") was
`
`duly and legally issued for a "Method for Securing Information Relevant to a Transaction." A
`
`true and correct copy of the '302 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`7.
`
`Stambler is the inventor and owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the
`
`'302 patent, and Stambler possesses all rights of recovery under it.
`
`8.
`
`Defendants MASTERCARD
`
`INCORPORATED
`
`(d/b/a MASTERCARD
`
`WORLDWIDE) and MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED ("MasterCard")
`
`have infringed claimed methods of the '302 patent.
`
`2
`
`MasterCard, Exh. 1002, p. 2
`
`

`
`·case 6:14-cv-60830-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2014 Page 3 of 4
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, MasterCard has directly infringed claims of the '302
`
`patent, including (for example) at least (i) claims 51 and 56 of the '302 patent by performing
`
`secure funds transaction services in an infringing manner, including accepting and processing
`
`funds transfers initiated using MasterCard's clearing and settlement products and/or services;
`
`and (ii) claims 7 and 8 of the '302 patent by engaging in encrypted communications (e.g, SSL
`
`and/or TLS messages exchanged in connection with MasterCard SecureCode ).
`
`10.
`
`Stambler has been damaged as a result of MasterCard's infringing conduct.
`
`MasterCard is, thus, liable to Stambler in an amount that adequately compensates him for its
`
`infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and
`
`costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
`
`IV. JURY DEMAND
`
`Stambler hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`Stambler requests that the Court find in his favor and against Defendants, and that the
`
`Court grant Stambler the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Judgment that one or more claims of United States Patent No. 5,793,302 have
`been infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by
`Defendants;
`
`Judgment that Defendants account for and pay to Stambler all damages to and
`costs incurred by Stambler because of Defendants' infringing activities and other
`conduct complained of herein;
`
`That Stambler be granted pre-judgment and post judgment interest on the
`damages caused by Defendants'
`infringing activities and other conduct
`complained of herein;
`
`That the Court declare this an exceptional case and award Stambler his reasonable
`attorney's fees and costs in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 285; and.·
`
`3
`
`MasterCard, Exh. 1002, p. 3
`
`

`
`Case 0:14-cv-60830-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2014 Page 4 of 4 .
`
`e.
`
`That Stambler be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just
`and proper under the circumstances.
`
`Dated: April 8, 2014.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Is! Joshua B. Spector
`Joshua B. Spector (FBN 0584142)
`Perlman, Bajandas, Yevoli & Albright, PL
`1000 Brickell A venue, Suite 600
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: (305) 377-0086
`Facsimile: (305) 377-0781
`jspector@pbyalaw.com
`
`Edward R. Nelson, III
`Texas State Bar No. 00797142
`Barry J. Bumgardner
`Texas State Bar No. 00793424
`NELSON BUMGARDNER CASTO, P.C.
`3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`(817) 377-9111
`(817) 377-3485 (fax)
`enelson@nbclaw.net
`barry@nbclaw.net
`Motion
`for Admission, Pro Hac Vice
`forthcoming
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`LEON STAMBLER
`
`4
`
`MasterCard, Exh. 1002, p. 4
`
`

`
`Case 0:14-cv-60830-DMM Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2014 Page 1 of 1,,
`
`AO 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`for the Southern District of Florida
`on the following
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`~Trademarks or D Patents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`LEON STAMBLER
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`for the Southern District of Florida
`DEFENDANT
`
`MASTERCARD INCORPORATED {d/b/a MASTERCARD
`WORLDWIDE) and MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL
`INCORPORATED
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 5,793,302
`
`8/11/1998
`
`"Method for Securing Information Relevant to a Transaction"
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`In the above-entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENTOR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`D Answer
`
`D Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`In the above-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`IDECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`I (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy 1-Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-Case .file copy
`
`MasterCard, Exh. 1002, p. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket