throbber

`
`Programming
`
`Program Formats
`
`“The devil is in the details,” wrote famed
`French author Gustave Flaubert, and for
`our purposes in this chapter, we could say
`that the devil is in the programming. Indeed,
`designing a radio station’s sound continues
`to be a bedeviling task, even as large radio
`companies cluster their outlets in the age
`of station consolidation. There is double
`
`the number of stations today competing
`for the audience’s attention than existed
`
`in the l960s, and more continue to enter
`the fray. Other media have proliferated as
`well, resulting in a further distraction of
`radio’s customary audience. The govern-
`ment’s laisseZ—faire, “let the marketplace
`dictate” philosophy, concerning commer—
`cial radio programming gives the station
`great freedom in deciding the nature of its
`air product, but determining what to offer
`the listener, who is often presented with
`dozens of audio alternatives, involves intri-
`cate planning. In the end, proffers Randy
`Michaels, “Programming is the key. Yes,
`I can hear my favorite songs on an iPod,
`but ‘sometimes you like to drive, some—
`times you like to ride.’ A good program—
`mer can create an experience that ‘shuffle’
`cannot. The iPod won’t bring play by play
`sports, breaking news, or
`introduce me
`to something new. It won’t put events in
`context.”
`
`The bottom—line, of course, is to air the
`type of format'that will attract a sizable
`enough piece of the audience demographic
`to satisfy the advertiser. Once a station
`decides on the format it will program, then
`it must know how to effectively execute it.
`
`Ultimately, says Emmis programmer Jimmy
`Steal, “Greatprogramming remains a constant
`regardless of amount/source of competition
`and the type of ratings methodology. The
`core of successful programming has always
`been unique Content, passionate/knowl—
`edgeable/distinctive/engaging personalities,
`a consistent source of new music (format
`applicable, of course], and an overall presen-
`tation that eschews a sense of fun, a sense
`of energy, a sense of drama [positive drama
`— maybe suspense is a better word here),
`and an overall friend to, or oasis from, the
`daily challenges in the lives of our listening
`constituencies.”
`
`That said, programming in today’s daunt—
`ing marketplace is no easy task, observes
`consultant Ed Shane. “The staff reductions
`
`in postconsolidation radio cause national
`chains to fill the time with something ~
`often syndication or repurposed content
`from another market. Ryan Seacrest is a
`perfect example. Seacrest does his morning“
`show at KISS in Los Angeles, then por—
`tions of the program are edited and repack-
`aged for other stations, mostly in the Clear
`Channel family [CC owns KISS), although
`the show is available to stations owned
`
`by companies other than Clear Channel.
`That reduces local radio to ‘repeater,’ not
`originator.”
`Brief descriptions of some of the most
`frequently employed formats in radio today
`follow. There are a host of other formats, or
`subformats — more than 100, in fact. Many
`are variations of those listed. The reader
`
`should keep in mind that formats morph as
`new trends in lifestyle and culture emerge.
`Radio formats are anything but static.
`
`75
`
`SAMSUNG 1039
`
`SAMSUNG 1039
`
`

`

`76
`CHAPTER 3 PROGRAMMING
`
`
`Adult Contemporary
`
`the format themselves. The AC format is
`
`also one of the most effective in attracting
`female listeners.
`
`AC outlets emphasize current and not
`so current [all the way back to the 1970s
`at some AC stations] pop standards, sans
`raucous, or harsh beats — in other words,
`no hard rock. Some AC stations could be
`
`In terms of the number of listeners, Adult
`Contemporary (AC; also referred to as The
`Mix, Hot AC, Triple A, Urban AC, Soft AC,
`Spectrum AC, and Lite AC) was the most
`popular format in the 19803 and continues
`to draw impressive audiences in the new
`millennium [number 3 most tuned format
`the
`rockers. However,
`described as soft
`according to Arbitron), although some sub—
`categories have lost ground since the last
`majority mix—in enough ballads and easy
`edition of this book. Says consultant Ed
`listening sounds to justify their title. The
`Shane, “Because the AC target audience is
`main thrust of this format’s programming
`is the music. More music is aired by deem—
`so diverse, the format has been most prone
`to fragmentation and competition.”
`phasizing chatter. Music is commonly pre—
`sented in uninterrupted sweeps or blocks,
`AC is very strong among the 25—49—year
`age group, which makes
`it particularly
`perhaps 10—12 minutes in duration,
`fol—
`appealing to advertisers, since this demo-
`lowed by a brief recap of artists and song
`titles. High—profile morning talent or teams
`graphic group has significant disposable
`income. Also, some advertisers spend money
`became popular at AC stations in the 19803
`on AC stations simply because they like
`and remain so today. Commercials generally
`
`
`FIGURE 3.]
`
`Courtesy Arbitron.
`
`
`
`
`
` National ‘Radie Format Shares and Station Counts
`
`Radio Format Rankings and Station Gaunt:
`Ranked Lt: Man-Sm 532364.431,
`Sham
`“moraifl ADM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`\
`;
`i
`i
`g
`l3
`l 33:33:: Cmimmmary H:i 5232::3:
`lumatMpi!Cerilemgs”a:'
`i U~..a~i lemporary
`$539121: Mora?
`Elia““dulttcrficmpsiary
`
`:33. M33
`mm
`:91} Starts
`‘
`
`p
`
`‘
`
`
`
`N
`
`_
`:2
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AQH
`5333:9123 Siations
`3:2,:
`3.833;
`m
`3.553:
`3.2
`.393;
`5.6
`38?
`45
`51.: l
`an
`3533:: 3
`3.?
`$723;
`3,?
`354%
`3,4
`333,
`3.2
`45‘:
`2.33
`zsel
`2::
`35::
`2.3
`75:3;
`2.2
`72:.
`2};
`3342‘
`2.:
`315
`2.0
`trial
`2,0
`225
`1.9
`7.4333
`1,8
`’72 l
`‘38
`202!
`is
`gag:
`1.5
`‘26 E
`.4
`3‘:
`3
`in
`7—233
`'19
`1533 l
`, as ., i,
`2333}
`
`Format
`iSoflAzi-‘JIICOtttampflrary
`lemma-i mus-rs
`3333:3135 hda’tis
`3'
`
`RQH
`Shara 12+ Stamina
`:19
`3:2
`:39
`.5.
`:33
`29c
`318
`"E“?
`:1?
`25:
`.
`in
`as
`3 Spam: 3mm
`6.6
`‘35
`game‘wra: Insisiwabmai
`9.6
`3‘:
`i hinder: «35.11ccmmpaiery
`>14
`$5,
`,Ldu-Aibma
`(1.:
`f5
`Nazi
`33:3
`:32
`3:323:63331332
`33.4
`52-
`1333331333 ‘itwsflak
`33.3
`122
`;:alira: UrLzu:
`0.3
`18
`{Refimwu
`33.3
`ME
`5893319?:‘3‘aiely
`33.2
`La
`’Easy Lsimg
`33.2
`97
`i E:3m:
`E12
`.
`ESm'ae-nféaswl
`:32
`32
`lSpams? Relgims
`0. 1
`is
`3 "ass Bias
`01
`:33
`7
`jwcaialga
`$11
`25
`“5921:3153: Lies
`33
`1
`2?
`3 Mir-:30
`
`0.1
`2.";
`: Urban Cir
`
`«3.0
`2;
`main
`is:1.
`0.0
`26
`ideil)‘ NS
`3.3.3.33:CW-C----
`
`
`
`‘3
`
`: Egan5i. Ernieflipzrary'
`ifdiNears
`,
`i"a::aly
`; filmm Mu?! Almmfive
`@3333,
`,_ ,
`
`,
`
`.,.
`
`,
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Radio Tansy 20338 Edifim
`
`
`
`mazes 3333mm :rc
`
`

`

`77
`Program Formats
`
`are clustered at predetermined times, and
`midday and evening deejay talk often is
`limited to brief informational announce—
`
`ments. News and sports are secondary to the
`music. In recent years, ACs have spawned a
`host of permutations, such as Adult Hits
`and Adult Standards, as well as the iPod
`wannabe formats, known as Jack and Mike,
`which
`typically
`distinguish
`themselves
`from their AC counterparts by featuring a
`broader playlist, sometimes venturing as far
`back as the 1960s for music selections. In
`
`the late 20003, according to Arbitron, the
`AC subgenre showing the most growth was
`Urban AC.
`‘
`
`Contemporary Hit Radio
`
`Once known as Top 40, Contemporary
`Hit Radio (CHR) stations play only those
`records that currently are the fastest selling.
`CHR’s narrow playlists are designed to
`draw teens and young adults. The heart of
`this format’s demographic is the 12—18 year
`olds, although in the mid—19805 it enjoyed a
`broadening of its core audience. Like AC, it
`too has experienced erosion in its numbers
`in recent years.
`In the Journal of Radio
`Studies [1995—1996], Ed Shane observed
`that the format “was a statistical loser in the
`1990s. What futurist Alvin Toffler called ‘the
`demassification of media’ affected CHR the
`
`most. There were too many types of music
`to play. No one radio station could create a
`format with elements as diverse as rapper
`Ice T, rockers like Nirvana, country artists
`like George Strait and Randy Travis, or jazz
`musicians like Kenny G or David Benoit.“
`Each of those performers fits someone’s
`definition of ‘contemporary hit radio.’ CHR
`lost its focus.”
`
`Consultant Jeff Pollack believed that
`
`CHR had lost ground because it was not
`in tune with what he called the ”streets,”
`and he predicted that the format would
`embrace a more dance-rap sound as well as
`develop more appreciation for alternative
`rock hits. The format is characterized by its
`swift and often unrelenting pace. Silence,
`known as “dead air,” is the enemy. The idea
`is to keep the sound hot and tight to keep
`the kids from station hopping, which is no
`small task since many markets have at least
`two hit—oriented stations.
`
`In the 1995 interview in Radio Ink,
`programmer Bill Richards predicted that
`the high—intensity jock approach would give
`way to a more laid—back, natural sound. “The
`days of the ‘move over and let the big dog
`eat’ sweepers are over. Top 40 will look for
`more jocks who sound like real people and
`shy away from the hyped deejay approach.”
`CHR deejays have undergone several shifts
`in status since the inception of the chart
`music format in the 19505. Initially, pop
`deejay personalities played an integral role
`in the air sound. However, in the mid—19605,
`the format underwent a major change when
`deejay presence was significantly reduced.
`Programming innovator Bill Drake decided
`that the Top 40 sound needed to be refur—
`bished and tightened. Thus, deejay talk and
`even the number of commercials scheduled
`
`each hour were cut back to improve the
`flow. Despite criticism that the new sound
`was too mechanical, Drake’s technique suc—
`ceeded at strengthening the format’s hold
`on the listening audience.
`In the mid— and late 1970s, the dee-
`jay’s role on hit stations began to regain
`its former prominence, but in the 19803,
`the format underwent a further renovation
`
`(initiated by legendary consultant Mike
`Joseph) that resulted in a narrowing of its
`playlist and a decrease in deejay presence.
`Super or Hot Hit stations, as they also are
`called, were among the most popular in
`the country and could be found either near
`or at the top of the rating charts in their
`markets.
`
`At the moment, at least, CHR has a bit
`less of a frenetic quality to it and perhaps a
`more mature sound. Undergoing an image
`adjustment,
`the format
`is keying in on
`improving overall flow while pulling back
`on jumping aboard the fad bandwagon. The
`continued preening of the playlist will keep
`the format viable, say the experts.
`News is of secondary importance on
`CHR stations. In fact, many program direc—
`tors (PDS) consider news programming to
`be a tune-out factor. “Kids don’t like news,”
`they claim. However, despite deregulation,
`which has freed stations of nonentertain~
`
`ment program requirements, most retain at
`least a modicum of news out of a sense of
`
`obligation. CHR stations are very promo—
`tion minded and contest oriented.
`
`

`

`78
`CHAPTER 3 PROGRAMMING
`
`
`FIGURE 3.2
`
`In the mid—20005,
`radio conceived a
`
`format emulating
`iPod diversity.
`Courtesy Jack
`FM 105.9.
`
`FIGURE 3.3
`Market format
`
`breakdown. Courtesy
`Mix 105.1.
`
`
`
`Fewer than 500 stations (nearly all FM)
`call themselves CHR. Many of these stations
`prefer to be called Rhythm Hits [Churban
`fell out of favor in the late 19905), which
`combines urban and rock hits, or Pop CHR/
`Modern Hits, a narrower-based version of
`Top 40 that draws its playlist from MTV/
`VH1 and college stations.
`
`country music’s rising popularity is the fact
`that there are over 10 times as many full-
`time Country stations today than there were
`25 years ago. Although the format is far
`more prevalent in the South and Midwest,
`most medium and large markets in the
`North have Country stations. Due to the
`diversity of approaches Within the format —
`for example, traditional, middle—of—the road
`(MGR), contemporary hit, and so on ~ the
`Country format attracts a broad age group,
`appealing to young as well as older adults.
`“The Country format has scored very high
`among ZS—S4—year—olds,” adds Burkhart.
`Says Shane,
`"In spite of predictions,
`Country has not fragmented. There are ways
`to skew the format for older or younger
`demos, but each group demands essentially
`Since the 1970s, the Country format has
`the same music. The difference is in presen—
`been adopted by more stations than any
`tation and content between the songs.”
`other. Although seldom a leader in the
`Country radio has always been particu-
`larly popular among blue-collar workers.
`ratings race until recent years,
`its appeal
`is exceptionally broad. An indication of According to the Country MusicAssociation
`
`Country
`
`
`
`FM
`’
`Picking You Up Ami Makin Tau Firewood
`g
`
`
`FRQQRAMMENQ
`
`QRQFELES
`Tuning araund
`.
`'
`.
`tha @réanaa 3?an Mai
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`M
`540
`580
`I
`740
`I
`990
`l
`1030
`1140
`1270
`1440
`1600
`A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WQTM WDBO
`WWNZ WHOO WONQ WRMQ WRLZ ’ WPRD WOKB
`
`
`
`
`FM
`92.3
`93.1
`94.5
`106.7 I 107.7
`|
`100.3 |
`I
`I
`I
`95.3
`96.5
`97.5
`98.1
`98.9
`101.1
`101.9
`103.1
`I 104.1
`105.1
`105.9
`
`
`WWKA WKRO WCFB WTLN WHTQ WPGV WGNE WMMO WSHE WJRR WJHM WLOQ WTKS WOMX WOCL WXXL WMG
`
`
`
`F
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNTRY
`CLASSIC ROCK
`JAMMIN OLDIES
`ADULT
`SPANISH
`CONTEMPORARY
`
`WOCL
`
`OLDIES
`
`WSHE
`ROCK
`
`WJRR
`
`ADULT STANDARD
`
`WHOO
`
`WWKA
`WPCV
`WGNE
`
`NEWS/TALK
`
`WWNZ
`WTKS
`WDBO
`
`CHR
`
`WXXL
`
`WOMX
`
`
`URBAN
`
`WJHM
`WCFB
`
`JAZZ
`
`WLOQ
`
`WONQ
`WRMQ
`WRLZ
`WOKB
`WPRD
`
`CHURBAN
`
`WTLN
`
`SPORTS
`
`WQTM
`
`WHTQ
`
`SOFT ROCK
`
`WMMO
`
`LITE ROCK
`
`WMGF
`
`ALTERNATIVE
`
`WKRO
`
`
`
`

`

`79
`Prog rom Formats
`
`and the Organization of Country Radio
`Broadcasters, the Country music format is
`drawing a more upscale audience today than
`it did in the past. As many FM as AM sta—
`tions are programming the Country sound
`in the 20003, which was not the case just a
`few years ago. Until the 1980s, Country was
`predominantly an AM offering. Depending
`on the approach they employ, Country
`outlets may emphasize or deemphasize
`air personalities, include news and public
`affairs features, or confine their program—
`ming almost exclusively to music.
`According to some programming experts,
`the Country format peaked in the mid-19905,
`butArbitron’s “National Radio Format Share
`and Station Counts” in 2008 indicated oth—
`
`Soft Adult/Easy Listening /Smooth
`Jazz
`
`The Beautiful Music station of the 1960s
`
`became the Easy Listening or Soft Adult
`station of the 20003. Playlists in this format
`have been carefully updated in an attempt
`to attract a somewhat younger audience.
`The term Beautiful Music was exchanged
`for Easy Listening in an effort to dispel the
`geriatric image the former term seemed to
`convey. Easy Listening is the ultimate ”wall-
`to—wall” music format. Talk of any type is
`kept minimal, although many stations in
`this format concentrate on news and infor—
`
`mation during morning drive time.
`Instrumentals and soft vocals of estab—
`
`erwise, as the format led all others in terms
`of audience size (12.7 share) and station’s
`claiming to be Country — 1683.
`
`lished songs are a mainstay at Soft Adult/
`Easy Listening stations, which also share a
`penchant for lush orchestrations featuring
`
`FIGURE 3.4
`
`Two top formats.
`Courtesy Arbitron.
`
`
`
`i1Isicislils flhilii
`
`No. x In Every Dagmar!
`miiiiun iisxenexs 83th week.
`With 56
`L‘Ounl
`.
`
`the biggest 32mm: of radio
`iisieziem 1.
`
`"very daygvan. and game:
`Audience snare both 5:1 warnings anti
`awnings.
`L‘amzlry ranked SCTEII‘lL‘highifii
`amnng all formats. in the percentage
`
`of irr-cax i351
`ing, which machcd
`
`mm m thin: 38%
`sivyear yeah And
`listening, to an actual raéjo was indend
`Country fax-3‘ preferred method, 3
`
`they r; Riv Saccnnd~lowest Gian
`1516:1815 for listening to streaming
`radi0 .
`3
`g
`1
`(Emmy was by E2: the {imminent
`farms! 3:1 the East South {tantra} :cgim !
`{which includes Tennessee and
`:
`Kentucky). and aim was the nation‘s
`,
`to}: format in (we of the othereighl
`‘
`geographic amas: {3 South Atlantic
`I
`{a}! 13mm KEEN!“ :2 Zward slates
`I
`Mus-:0}: mfiawam and Ficuidaf. “‘25:
`i
`Saul}; Carnal {including Tm
`‘
`
`North Cami (including, [Iii
`:
`,
`Miehigaxs and Ohio). West North
`i
`Central [the Plains states] and
`,
`Mailman: tarixmiae.
`
`AQH Share of Listening by Location
`Ferstns 724-. Mon-3m, warned
`Other
`2.5%
`
`A: Home
`33.532
`
`
`
`AQH Share of Listening by Daypart
`Peasants 32*
`
`
`
`.
`Mon
`fifilii-TGIAM
`
`Mon-m
`’ 10A).L3F?L(
`
`
`Mon— 3
`Hmt-WH
`
`MomFri
`73!.l-M‘Ki
`
`,
`
`12.792
`him-Sm
`GMLMES
`
`J
`
`Audience Share by Region
`12.7% = Nacona! Amragus
`Parsons m. MmSm, GRV-fklli AOH Sham
`
`
`Was: Nash Carma
`”“373 "’
`East Nat-i Germ:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.1iIsi1ilii
`
`w ..
`
`.-;-.; mm m (p‘wf‘f‘f: 41:4
`
`
`
`u Radio Today 2mg Edam '
`_ M_2
`. 2 .mmmwuw'
`
`-
`
`Tit-s: Sow—1 Sarita:
`cadmium b
`
`
`
`
`
`V 9::
`flkbmarci'
`
`
`

`

`CHAPTER 3 PROGRAMMING
`80
`
`
`plenty of strings. These stations boast a
`devoted audience.
`
`Station hopping is uncommon. Efforts to
`draw younger listeners into the Easy Listen—
`ing fold have been moderately successful,
`but most of the format’s primary adherents
`are over 50 years. Music syndicators provide
`prepackaged (canned) programming to
`approximately half of the nation’s Easy Lis-
`tening/Soft Adult/Smooth Jazz stations, and
`over three-quarters of the outlets within this
`format utilize computer—automated systems
`to varying degrees; Easy Listening has lost
`some ground in the 19908 and 20008 to
`AC and other adult—appeal formats such as
`Album Adult Alternative and something
`called New Age, which some media critics
`describe as Easy Listening for Yuppies.
`Soft Adult, Lite and Easy, Smooth Jazz,
`Adult Standards,
`and Urban AC have
`
`for
`become replacement nomenclatures
`Easy Listening, which, like its predecessor,
`Beautiful Music, began to assume a geriatric
`connotation.
`
`Rock and Alternative
`
`The birth of the Album -Oriented Rock
`[AORJ format in the late 1960s (also called
`Underground and Progressive) was the result
`of a basic disdain for the highly formulaic
`Top 40 sound that prevailed at the time. In
`the summer of 1966, WOR-FM, New York,
`introduced Progressive radio, the forerun—
`ner of AOR. As an alternative to the super—
`hyped, ultra—commercial sound of the hit
`song station, WOR—FM programmed an
`unorthodox combination of nonchart rock,
`blues,
`folk, and jazz.
`In the 1970s,
`the
`format concentrated its attention almost
`
`FIGURE 3.4
`Continued
`
`
`
`Iii
`
`,liEEirl iIKIrilv
`
`,iiiiiIiggiEiiIiI gflKti
`
`.Ii i
`
`Strong ‘li‘iL. Academic;
`Income i’mi‘de
`
`
`
`155 um who
`The segment Of Ix
`
`
`i b
`we w collage g:
`
`, 1"
`
`:00? were in he?
`
`
`37-51mm or more: the
`
`
`at all Entrants.
`
`est-apt aw
`
`up an mizmt
`
`
`‘sud/gag;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`;i
`3
`
`MMMWWWMMWLWWMgum.MWWMNMMWWMMflnMWM"WWMMWWMW. .
`' may awe Edmm'
`
`Education
`Perseus 1%
`
`:2h
`”:
`
`"J ‘
`
`“*4 go
`35"021
`Grawa‘e
`
`
`
`Household Income
`”Mme 16*
`
`
`
`Ethnic Camposi’cion*
`AG”! er:
`5
`“my m:
`
`Time Spent Listening by Demographic
`{Hsursmttulccs}
`him-Sue mantis:
`
`
`
`9:03
`
`
`
`Vii-E4
`
`NWNWWW~WMM
`
`mime k
`M
`
`.5; Edi manna Ta:
`
`

`

`Program Formats
`
`exclusively on album rock, while becoming
`less freeform and more formulaic and sys-
`tematic in its programming approach.
`Today, AOR often is simply called Rock,
`or more specifically Modern Rock or Classic
`Rock, and although it continues to do well
`in garnering the 18~34—year—old male, this
`format has always done poorly in winning
`female listeners, especially when it empha—
`sizes a heavy or hard-rock playlist. This
`has proven to be a sore spot with certain
`advertisers. In the 19805, the format lost its
`prominence owing, in part, to the meteoric
`rebirth of hit radio. However, as the decade
`came to an end, AOR had regained a chunk
`of its numbers, and in the 19908, it renamed
`itself Modern Rock.
`
`Generally, Rock stations broadcast their
`music in sweeps or at least segue two or
`three songs. A large airplay library is typical,
`in which 300—700 cuts may be active.
`Depending on the outlet, the deejay may
`or may not have “personality” status. In fact,
`the more-music/less—talk approach particu-
`larly common at Easy Listening stations is
`emulated by many album rockers, Conse-
`quently, news plays a very minor part in the
`station’s programming efforts.
`Rock [also called Active Rock] stations
`are very lifestyle—oriented and invest great
`time and energy developing promotions
`relevant to the interests and attitudes of
`
`their listeners. Reflecting the considerable
`drift away from the AOR nomenclature and
`model, WBCN’s longtime PD, Oedipus,
`declared to the world in 1995, “We’re
`Modern Rockl”
`The Alternative Rock format tries ’for dis—
`
`tinctiveness. That is to say, it attempts to
`provide a choice that is in contrast to the other
`Rock radio approaches. Creating this alter—
`native sound is a challenge, says Stephanie
`Hindley, PD of Buzz 99.9: “The Alternative
`format is a great challenge for programmers.
`Think of the music you liked and the things
`you did when you were 18. Now think of
`the music you liked (or will like] and the
`things you did (or will do) at age 34. Despite
`the vast differences in taste in the 18—34
`
`demographic, we need to play music that
`will appeal to as many people as possible
`within this diverse group. It’s a constant bal—
`ancing act. We have to play a lot of new
`music without sounding too unfamiliar. We
`
`have to be cool and hip without sounding
`exclusive. We have to be edgy without being
`offensive. Be smart without sounding conde—
`scending. Young and upbeat without sound—
`ing immature. As long as those balances are
`maintained on a daily basis, we will continue
`to have success in this format.”
`
`News and Talk
`
`There are News, News/Talk, News Sports,
`News Plus, and Talk formats, and each is dis—
`tinct and unique unto itself. News stations
`differ from the others in that they devote
`their entire air schedule to the presentation
`of news and news~related stories and fea-
`tures. The All-News format was introduced
`
`by Gordon McLendon at XETRA [known
`as XTRA) in Tijuana, Mexico, in the early
`1960s Its success soon inspired the spread of
`the format in the United States. Because of
`
`the enormous expense involved in presentat—
`ing a purely News format, requiring three to
`four times the staff and budget of most music
`operations, the format has been confined to
`larger markets able to support the endeavor.
`The News/Talk format
`is a hybrid. It
`combines extensive news coverage with
`blocks of two—way telephone conversations.
`These stations commonly ”daypart” or seg—
`mentalize their programming by presenting
`lengthened newscasts during morning and
`afternoon drive time hours and conversa—
`
`tion in the midday and evening periods.
`The News/Talk combo was conceived by
`KGO in San Francisco in the 1960s and
`
`has gradually gained in popularity so that
`it now leads botH’tEe strictly News and the
`Talk formats. Talk radio began at KABC—
`AM, Los Angeles, in 1960. However, talk
`shows were familiar to listeners in the
`
`19505, since a number of adult music sta—
`tions devoted a few hours during evenings
`or overnight to call-in programs. The moti-
`vation behind most early Talk programming
`stemmed from a desire to strengthen weak
`time slots while satisfying public affairs pro~
`gramming requirements. Like its nonmusic
`siblings, Talk became a viable format in the
`19605 and does well today, although it too
`has suffered due to greater competition.
`In contrast to All—News, which attracts a
`slightly younger and more upscale audience,
`All—Talk amasses a large following among
`
`

`

`,82
`CHAPTER 3 PROGRAMMING
`
`
`blue—collar workers and retirees, and in 2008
`was classified as the second most popular
`format in radio.
`One of the recent news and information—
`oriented formats calls itself News Plus. Even
`
`radio and significantly contributed to the
`dominance of “chatter” radio in the ratings.
`Today, several hundred stations offer around—
`the—clock sports talk, among them WFAN
`and WEEI in the Northeast and KLAC and
`
`though its emphasis is on news, it fills periods
`with music, often AC in flavor. News Plus
`stations also may carry a heavy schedule of
`sporting events. This combination did well
`for a while in several medium and large
`markets but began to fizzle in favor of newer
`permutations in the early 2000s.
`News and/or Talk formats are primarily
`located on the AM band, where they have
`become increasingly prevalent since FM has
`captured all but a few of radio’s music lis—
`teners. Meanwhile, the number of nonmusic
`formats is significantly increasing on FM,
`and this trend is predicted to continue as
`music listeners rely more and more on other
`audio sources.
`
`In the late 1990s, over 1000 stations
`offered the information and/or news format.
`
`This was up nearly 300% since the late 1980s.
`In 2008, Arbitron claimed in excess of 1500
`stations aired the talk format. Over 100 sta—
`
`tions alone concentrated on sports exclu—
`sively, and dozens of others were beginning
`to splinter and compartmentalize into news/
`info niches, such as auto, health, computer,
`food, business, tourism, and entertainment.
`National
`talk networks and syndicated
`talk shows, mostly of a conservative nature,
`continued to draw huge audiences in the
`new millennium, as more and more Baby
`Boomers became engaged in the political
`and social dialogues of the day. Despite the
`fact that a liberal talk radio network (Air
`America] debuted in the 20005, its recep—
`tion was anything but stellar as right—wing
`hosts (Rush Limbaugh being the king among
`them] continued to rule the genre.
`An indication that the information format
`
`is achieving broader appeal among younger
`listeners is the recent emergence on the FM
`dial of a new hybrid called Talk ‘n’ Rock. This
`format variation to the mainstream Talk tem-
`
`plate has yet to find a viable audience niche.
`
`All Sports
`
`The trend in the last few years in the
`proliferation of
`the All—Sports
`format
`has boosted the popularity of nonmusic
`
`KJR on the West Coast. In addition, several
`sports networks now appear across the radio
`band. Since the mid—19905, ESPN Radio
`Network, Fox Sports Radio, and Sporting
`News Radio have emerged and are now
`carried by stations throughout the country.
`If AM radio is able to claim a younger demo-
`graphic at all, it is because men 18—29 are big
`fans of sports radio. Meanwhile, All Sports
`has begun to migrate to PM in significant
`numbers.
`
`According to Arbitron, All Sports ranked
`13th among formats at the start of 2009
`with over 14 million weekly listeners. More
`men tune All Sports radio than women,
`and the audience is almost exclusively over
`25 years old. It is a highly educated audi-
`ence with an upper—income.
`Consultant Ed Shane makes this obser-
`
`vation regarding the success of the format.
`“The element of ‘guy talk’ is an important
`factor and one of the central ingredients
`that gives this format its special appeal.”
`
`FM Talk
`
`Perhaps the most unique manifestation in
`nonmusic radio is the growing presence of
`talk on FM. Talent consultant Jason Insa-
`
`laco gives his perspective on the rise of the '
`discourse format on What has always been
`the dial for music: “While traditional AM
`
`talk has been profiled in recent years for
`its explosion onto the radio landscape, FM
`talk radio has become a popular format for
`an audience previously ignored by talk pro-
`grammers. FM talk’s primary audience is
`25—44 years old. This demographic likely
`did not grow up listening to AM talk radio.
`In fact, the FM talk audience has very likely
`tuned AM very little during its lifetime. FM
`talk does not program itself like a traditional
`full—service AM talk outlet. There is not the
`
`emphasis on news and traffic, which is a
`staple of the AM talkers. Rather FM talk’s
`focus is personality driven, aka Mancow,
`Tom Leykis, and Opie and Anthony. These
`FM talk stalwarts do incorporate some
`news into their programs, but the main
`
`

`

`83
`Program Formats
`
`focus is entertainment. FM talk programs
`itself more like an FM music station than
`
`an AM talk station. It features shorter seg—
`ments covering a variety of issues in con—
`trast to the 1—hour AM talk sweep. Issues
`discussed typically come from sources like
`Rolling Stone and People magazine and the
`local sports and entertainment section of
`the newspaper. Topics are not necessarily
`caller intensive as with most AM talkers.
`
`Listener participation is a part of FM talk
`radio; however,
`there is not
`the typical
`topic—monologue-caller participation cycle
`ofAM talkers. Moreover, the ‘bumper music’
`played to intro segments of FM talk comes
`from the latest alternative and rock artists
`
`found on the competing music stations. This
`gives the station a youthful sound and grabs
`the potential talk listener who is scanning
`the dial. FM talk’s competition comes from
`Alternative/Modern Rock/AOR and Classic
`Rock stations. The future of FM talk looks
`
`bright. Expect the format to become more
`widespread in the coming years.”
`Clearly, the number of FM talk outlets
`in major markets is on the increase. A good
`example is 96.9 FM in Boston, which has
`made serious inroads into the nonmusic
`
`radio arena. In recent surveys, it has chal—
`lenged the city’s long-standing talk-oriented
`stations on AM, a feat that is being dupli-
`cated in other markets around the country.
`
`Classic/Oldies/Nostalgia
`
`Although these formats are not identical,
`they derive the music they play from years
`gone by.’A'lthough the Nostalgia’ws’tation,
`sometimes referred to as Big Band, con-
`structs its playlist around tunes popular
`as far back as the 19405 and 19505, the
`Oldies outlet focuses its attention on the
`
`pop tunes of the late 19505 and 19605. A
`typical Oldies quarter-hour might consist of
`songs by Elvis Presley, the Everly Brothers,
`the Beatles, Brian Hyland, Three Dog Night,
`and the Ronettes. In contrast, 3 Nostalgia
`quarter-hour might consist of tunes from
`the prerock era performed by artists like
`Frankie Lane, Les Baxter, the Mills Brothers,
`Tommy Dorsey, and popular ballad singers
`of the last few decades.
`
`Nostalgia radio caught on in the late
`1970s, the concept of programmer Al Ham.
`
`Nostalgia is a highly syndicated format, and
`most stations go out—of—house for program—
`ming material. Because much of the music
`predates stereo processing, AM outlets are
`most apt
`to carry the Nostalgia sound.
`Music is invariably presented in sweeps, and,
`for the most part, deejays maintain a low
`profile. Similar to Easy Listening, Nostalgia
`pushes its music to the forefront and keeps
`other program elements at an unobtrusive
`distance.
`In the 19805, Easy Listening/
`Beautiful Music stations lost some listeners
`
`to this format, which claimed a Viable share
`of the radio audience.
`The Oldies format was first introduced in
`
`the 19605 by programmers Bill Drake and
`Chuck Blore. Although Nostalgia’s audience
`tends to be over the age of 50, most Oldies
`listeners are somewhat younger. Unlike
`Nostalgia, most Oldies outlets originate their
`own programming, and very few are auto—
`mated. In contrast with its vintage music
`cousin,
`the Oldies format allows greater
`deejay presence. At many Oldies stations,
`air personalities play a key role. Music is
`rarely broadcast in sweeps, and commercials,
`rather than being clustered, are inserted in a
`random fashion between songs.
`Consultant Kent Burkhart noted that in
`
`the early 19905, “Oldies stations are scoring
`very big in a nice broad demographic. These
`stations are doing quite well today, and this
`should hold for a while.” That said, in 2008
`Arbitron reported that the Oldies format
`experienced the sharp est decline in audience
`numbers of all the vintage—oriented stations —
`with 30 stations dropping the sound in just
`1 year. At the same time, Nostalgia has not
`been shown as having much growth but
`remains fairly solid in some markets. In the
`1990s, Oldies outlets lost audience ground.
`However, over 700 stations still call them-
`selves Oldies or Nostalgia. Meanwhile, a
`more dance/contemporary approach, called
`“Jammin’ Oldies,” has attracted additional
`listeners.
`Meanwhile Classic Rock and Classic Hit
`
`the biggest winners
`stations emerged as
`in the late 19805 and early 19905, and of
`the Vintage format genres, they can boast
`the biggest audience shares in last part
`of the 2000s These yesteryear music sta-
`tions draw their playlists from the chart
`toppers [primarily in the rock music area)
`
`

`

`84
`CHAPTER 3 PROGRAMMING
`
`
`of the 19705 and 1980s (and early 19905)
`and often appear in the top 10 ratings.
`Classic Rock concentrates on tunes essen-
`
`tially featured by former AOR stations over
`the past two decades, whereas Classic Hit
`stations fill the gap between Oldies and
`CHR outlets with playlists that draw from
`19705, 19805, and 19905 Top 40 charts.
`
`Urban Contemporary
`
`Considered the ”melting pot” format, Urban
`Contemporary [UC], attracts large numbers
`of Hispanic and Black listeners, as well as
`white. As the term suggests, stations employ—
`
`ing this format usually are located in met—
`ropolitan areas with large, heterogeneous
`populations. UC was born in the early 19808,
`the offspring of the short—lived Disco format,
`which burst onto the scene in 1978. What
`
`characterizes UC the most is its upbeat,
`danceable sound and deejays who are hip,
`friendly, and energetic. Although UC outlets
`stress danceable tunes, their playlists gener-
`ally are anything but narrow. However, a
`particular sound may be given preference
`over another, dependin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket