throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Patent 8,033,458
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`

`
`       
`
`      
`
`      
`
`       
`

`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Attorney Docket No: 39843-0005CP1
`
`Further to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), requiring a separate paper requesting oral
`

`

`
`hearing and specifying issues to be argued, Petitioner submits this Request for Oral
`
`Hearing on the instituted grounds of unpatentability for claim 11 (all of the instituted
`
`claims) of U.S. Patent No. 8,033,458 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and associated issues.
`
`See Paper 7 at 14-15. The Board has already scheduled the Oral Hearing in this
`
`proceeding (consolidated with CBM2015-00119 involving an additional Petitioner
`
`Apple) for November 9, 2015. See Paper 30 at 2. This Oral Hearing for November
`
`9, 2015 is scheduled along with CBM2014-00199 involving the same Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner and related patents, and CBM2014-00193 (consolidated with
`
`CBM2015-00120), CBM2014-00194 (consolidated with CBM2015-00117),
`
`CBM2015-00015, CBM2015-00016, and CBM2015-00017 involving related patents
`
`and the additional petitioner Apple. Id. Samsung respectfully suggests that, once
`
`the parties to the foregoing proceedings have had an opportunity to confer following
`
`the filing of all associated Requests for Oral Hearing, the parties and Board may
`
`benefit from a conference call to discuss the logistics for the coordination of
`
`proceedings scheduled for November 9, 2015. To account for the multiple
`
`proceedings taking place on the same day, as well as the expected number of counsel
`
`(including litigation counsel in related district court proceedings) and party
`
`representatives for each party, Petitioner further respectfully requests that, to the
`

`
`2
`
`

`

`
`extent practicable, the Oral Hearings for each above-listed proceeding take place in
`
`Courtroom A.
`

`
`Respectfully submitted,
`     /Thomas A. Rozylowicz/ 
`
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`Reg. No. 50,620
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Petitioners
`

`
`
`
`
`
`  
`
`       9/21/2015 
`Date:
`
`
`
`
`(Trial No. CBM2014-00192)
`

`
`3
`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Attorney Docket No: 39843-0005CP1
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.205(b), the undersigned certifies that
`

`

`

`
`on September 21, 2015, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for
`
`Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the
`
`correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Michael R. Casey
`J. Scott Davidson
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr., Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`
`Email: mcasey@dbjg.com
`jsd@dbjg.com
` docket@dbjg.com
`
`
`
`/Christine L. Rogers/
`Christine L. Rogers
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(650) 839-5092
`
`
`4
`
`        
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket