`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Patent 8,033,458
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Attorney Docket No: 39843-0005CP1
`
`Further to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), requiring a separate paper requesting oral
`
`
`
`
`
`hearing and specifying issues to be argued, Petitioner submits this Request for Oral
`
`Hearing on the instituted grounds of unpatentability for claim 11 (all of the instituted
`
`claims) of U.S. Patent No. 8,033,458 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and associated issues.
`
`See Paper 7 at 14-15. The Board has already scheduled the Oral Hearing in this
`
`proceeding (consolidated with CBM2015-00119 involving an additional Petitioner
`
`Apple) for November 9, 2015. See Paper 30 at 2. This Oral Hearing for November
`
`9, 2015 is scheduled along with CBM2014-00199 involving the same Petitioner and
`
`Patent Owner and related patents, and CBM2014-00193 (consolidated with
`
`CBM2015-00120), CBM2014-00194 (consolidated with CBM2015-00117),
`
`CBM2015-00015, CBM2015-00016, and CBM2015-00017 involving related patents
`
`and the additional petitioner Apple. Id. Samsung respectfully suggests that, once
`
`the parties to the foregoing proceedings have had an opportunity to confer following
`
`the filing of all associated Requests for Oral Hearing, the parties and Board may
`
`benefit from a conference call to discuss the logistics for the coordination of
`
`proceedings scheduled for November 9, 2015. To account for the multiple
`
`proceedings taking place on the same day, as well as the expected number of counsel
`
`(including litigation counsel in related district court proceedings) and party
`
`representatives for each party, Petitioner further respectfully requests that, to the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`extent practicable, the Oral Hearings for each above-listed proceeding take place in
`
`Courtroom A.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /Thomas A. Rozylowicz/
`
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`Reg. No. 50,620
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 9/21/2015
`Date:
`
`
`
`
`(Trial No. CBM2014-00192)
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00192
`Attorney Docket No: 39843-0005CP1
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.205(b), the undersigned certifies that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`on September 21, 2015, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for
`
`Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the
`
`correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Michael R. Casey
`J. Scott Davidson
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr., Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`
`Email: mcasey@dbjg.com
`jsd@dbjg.com
` docket@dbjg.com
`
`
`
`/Christine L. Rogers/
`Christine L. Rogers
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(650) 839-5092
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`