Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-004USCBM
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
`AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`____________
`PATENT OWNER MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S
`MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-004USCBM
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
`AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`____________
`PATENT OWNER MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S
`MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, in response to the Petition for Post-Grant
`
`Review on U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880 (“the ’880 Patent”), Patent Owner Maxim
`
`Integrated Products, Inc. submits the following Mandatory Notices.
`
`1. Real Party-In-Interest
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), Patent Owner identifies the real
`
`party-in-interest as Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
`
`2. Related Matters
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2), Patent Owner identifies the
`
`following related proceedings. As noted in connection with the individual
`
`proceedings, several of the identified proceedings have been dismissed.
`
`I. Proceedings Involving The ’880 Patent.
`
`a. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2013-00059, of US
`5,949,880 (petition for institution of review denied March 20, 2014,
`paper 12);
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
`b. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00039, of US 5,949,880
`(petition for review denied June 3, 2014, paper 20);
`c. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 2013-
`1495 (Fed. Cir.) (judgment affirmed March 10, 2014, Dkt. 51);
`d. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 4:12-cv-
`00369-RAS (E.D. Tex) (judgment affirmed March 10, 2014, Dkt. 33);
`e. In re Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., MDL No. 2354, No. 2:12-mc-
`00244;
`f. As transferred for MDL purposes:
`
` PNC Fin. Servs. Grp., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-
`cv-00089-JFC (dismissed May 29, 2014, Dkt. 844)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 2:12-
`cv- 01641-JFC
` KeyCorp v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00860-JFC
`(dismissed August 20, 2013, Dkt. 648)
` Vanguard Grp., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`00862-JFC (dismissed February 19, 2014, Dkt. 773)
` Jack Henry & Assocs., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00863-JFC (dismissed February 20, 2014, Dkt. 775)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Comerica Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00869-
`JFC (dismissed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 887)
` Fidelity Brokerage Servs. LLC v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00871-JFC (dismissed May 16, 2014, Dkt. 840)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. First United Bank & Trust Co., No.
`2:12-cv-00876-JFC (dismissed February 19, 2014, Dkt. 774)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Starbucks Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00877-
`JFC (dismissed April 7, 2014, Dkt. 798)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Expedia, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00878-
`JFC (dismissed July 10, 2014, Dkt. 873)
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Capital One Fin. Corp., No. 2:12-cv-
`00879-JFC (dismissed December 12, 2013, Dkt. 738)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Bank of the West, No. 2:12-cv-
`00880-JFC (motion to dismiss filed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 893)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Groupon, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00881-
`JFC (dismissed without prejudice August 20, 2014, Dkt. 886)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Union Bank, N.A., No. 2:12-cv-
`00882-JFC (dismissed February 6, 2014, Dkt. 763)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co., No. 2:12-
`cv-00883-JFC (dismissed May 5, 2014, Dkt. 836)
` Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00887-JFC (dismissed August 5, 2014, Dkt. 882)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. QVC, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00891-JFC
`(dismissed March 14, 2014, Dkt. 789)
` Clairmail Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00923-
`NBF (dismissed August 31, 2012, Dkt. 146)
` Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00945-JFC
` BMO Harris Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-01538-JFC
` Deutsche Bank AG v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`01604-JFC
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-01628-
`JFC (dismissed May 22, 2014, Dkt. 800)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Target Corp., No. 2:12-cv-01629-
`JFC (dismissed April 23, 2014, Dkt. 821)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 2:12-cv-
`01639-JFC (dismissed May 1, 2014, Dkt. 831)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 2:12-cv-
`01640-JFC (dismissed June 19, 2014, Dkt. 861)
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp, No. 2:12-cv-01642-
`JFC (dismissed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 888)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Walmart Stores, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`01643-JFC (dismissed February 6, 2014, Dkt. 764)
`II. Proceedings Involving Other US Patents.
`
`US Patent No. 5,949,880 is a divisional from application no. 08/594,975,
`
`from which US 5,940,510 issued. US Patent No. 5,940,510 contains related
`
`subject matter to and incorporates by reference application No. 08/595,014, from
`
`which the application issuing as US Patent No. 6,237,095 was a divisional. US
`
`Patent No. 6,105,013 is a continuation of application No. 08/594,983, which claims
`
`priority to provisional application No. 60/004,510, to which US 6,237,095 also
`
`claims priority. US 6,237,095 is a divisional from application No. 08/595,014,
`
`from which the US Patent No. 5,805,702 issued. Numerous related proceedings
`
`identified above involving the ’880 Patent also involve one or all of these patents.
`
`Patent Owner identifies below the following additional proceedings not
`
`directly involving the ’880 Patent but relating to one or more of US 5,805,702, US
`
`5,940,510, US 6,105,013, and US 6,237,095. As noted in connection with the
`
`individual proceedings, several of the identified proceedings have been dismissed.
`
`a. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00038, of US 5,940,510
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
`b. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00040, of US 6,105,013
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`c. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00041, of US 6,237,095
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`d. Ex Parte Reexamination, Control No. 90/013,063, of USP 5,940,510
`(request accorded filing date of December 16, 2013);
`e. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00177, of US
`6,237,095 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`f. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00178, of US
`6,105,013 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`g. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00179, of US
`5,940,510 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`h. Groupon Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00090, of US 5,805,702
`(terminated August 20, 2014, paper 12).
`
`
`
`
`
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Lead and Back-Up Counsel
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3), Patent Owner identifies Kenneth
`
`J. Weatherwax as lead counsel and Parham Hendifar as back-up counsel:
`
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Lead Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 54,528
`
`GOLDBERG, LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`11400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, California 90064
`Telephone: (310) 307-4503
`Facsimile: (310) 307-4509
`Email: weatherwax@glwllp.com
`
`Parham Hendifar, Back-Up Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 71,470
`
`GOLDBERG, LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`11400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, California 90064
`Telephone: (310) 307-4510
`Facsimile: (310) 307-4509
`Email: hendifar@glwllp.com
`
`6
`
`
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. Service Information
`
`Case CBM2014-00180
`Patent 5,949,880
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-001USCBM
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(4), Patent Owner identifies the
`
`following service information:
`
`Stefani Smith, Esq.
`Tensegrity Law Group, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`
`Email: stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`Telephone: 650-802-6050
`Facsimile: 650-802-6001
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`____/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax /_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Goldberg, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`Date: September 11, 2014
`
`7
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re: Covered Business Method Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880
`Case No. CBM2014-00180
`Filed: September 11, 2014
`For: TRANSFER OF VALUABLE
`INFORMATION BETWEEN A SECURE
`MODULE AND ANOTHER MODULE
`Certificate of Service
`
`
`
`Administrative Patent Judge: Mitchell
`Weatherly
`Atty. Docket: 140828-004USCBM
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`September 11, 2014
`Sir:
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned, on behalf of the Patent Owner,
`hereby certifies that a copy of the following document is being served on the Petitioner by
`Express Mail and electronic mail on September 11, 2014.
`
`PATENT OWNER MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S
`MANDATORY NOTICES
`POWER OF ATTORNEY
`The names and addresses of the parties being served are as follows:
`
`Andrea G. Reister
`Jay I. Alexander
`Gregory S. Discher
`Covington & Burling LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`
`
`Very truly yours,
`____/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax /_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Goldberg, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
