Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS,
`INC. MDL No. 2354
`
`This Document Relates to: All Actions
`
`
`
`Master Docket
`Misc. No. 12-244
`MDL No. 2354
`CONTI, District Judge
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
`REGARDING U.S. PATENT NO. 5,949,880
`
`
`Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”), as owner of the entire right and title to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,949,880 (“the ’880 Patent”), having made the following covenants on behalf of
`
`itself and any successor-in-interest that Maxim may have to the’880 Patent:
`
`(a) Maxim unconditionally and irrevocably covenants not to assert patent
`
`infringement (including direct infringement, contributory infringement, and inducing
`
`infringement) in connection with Maxim's ’880 Patent against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and
`
`JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), its customers, end users or distributors, based on
`
`manufacture, having manufactured, importation, distribution, use, sale and/or offering for sale of
`
`any Chase application or website, including any supporting software or server infrastructure
`
`thereof. This covenant extends to past, present, or future activities as to Chase’s past or present
`
`applications or website (and to future versions not materially different functionally from them),
`
`including any supporting software or server infrastructure thereof; and
`
`(b) Maxim unconditionally and irrevocably covenants not to assert patent
`
`infringement (including direct infringement, contributory infringement, and inducing
`
`infringement) in connection with Maxim's ’880 Patent against Branch Banking and Trust
`
`Company (“BB&T”), its customers, end users or distributors, based on manufacture, having
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`-1-
`
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS,
`INC. MDL No. 2354
`
`This Document Relates to: All Actions
`
`
`
`Master Docket
`Misc. No. 12-244
`MDL No. 2354
`CONTI, District Judge
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS
`REGARDING U.S. PATENT NO. 5,949,880
`
`
`Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”), as owner of the entire right and title to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,949,880 (“the ’880 Patent”), having made the following covenants on behalf of
`
`itself and any successor-in-interest that Maxim may have to the’880 Patent:
`
`(a) Maxim unconditionally and irrevocably covenants not to assert patent
`
`infringement (including direct infringement, contributory infringement, and inducing
`
`infringement) in connection with Maxim's ’880 Patent against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and
`
`JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), its customers, end users or distributors, based on
`
`manufacture, having manufactured, importation, distribution, use, sale and/or offering for sale of
`
`any Chase application or website, including any supporting software or server infrastructure
`
`thereof. This covenant extends to past, present, or future activities as to Chase’s past or present
`
`applications or website (and to future versions not materially different functionally from them),
`
`including any supporting software or server infrastructure thereof; and
`
`(b) Maxim unconditionally and irrevocably covenants not to assert patent
`
`infringement (including direct infringement, contributory infringement, and inducing
`
`infringement) in connection with Maxim's ’880 Patent against Branch Banking and Trust
`
`Company (“BB&T”), its customers, end users or distributors, based on manufacture, having
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`-1-
`
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`manufactured, importation, distribution, use, sale and/or offering for sale of any BB&T
`
`application or website, including any supporting software or server infrastructure thereof. This
`
`covenant extends to past, present, or future activities as to BB&T’s past or present applications
`
`or website (and to future versions not materially different functionally from them), including any
`
`supporting software or server infrastructure thereof;
`
`Maxim, Chase, and BB&T hereby stipulate to the following and request, pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), that the Court enter an Order thereon:
`
`1) All claims brought by Maxim against Chase relating to U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880
`
`(“’880 patent”), including Count II of Maxim’s Complaint and the request for relief
`
`associated with Count II are dismissed with prejudice;
`
`2) All claims brought by Maxim against BB&T relating to U.S. Patent No. 5,949,880
`
`(“’880 patent”), including Count II of Maxim’s Counterclaims and the request for
`
`relief associated with Count II are dismissed with prejudice;
`
`3) Chase’s affirmative defenses relating to the ’880 patent are dismissed without
`
`prejudice;
`
`4) BB&T’s claims and affirmative defenses relating to the ’880 patent are dismissed
`
`without prejudice;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`-2-
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 26, 2014
`
` Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ William P. Nelson
`Matthew D. Powers (pro hac vice)
`Steven S. Cherensky (pro hac vice)
`Paul T. Ehrlich (pro hac vice)
`William P. Nelson (pro hac vice)
`Aaron M. Nathan (pro hac vice)
`Stefani C. Smith (pro hac vice)
`Sam Y. Kim (pro hac vice)
`Robert L. Gerrity (pro hac vice)
`Palani P. Rathinasamy (pro hac vice)
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 802-6000
`Fax: (650) 802-6001
`Email:
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
`paul.ehrlich@tensegritylawgroup.com
`william.nelson@tensegritylawgroup.com
`aaron.nathan@tensegritylawgroup.com
`stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`sam.kim@tensegritylawgroup.com
`robert.gerrity@tensegritylawgroup.com
`palani@tensegritylawgroup.com
`
`Leland P. Schermer, Esquire
`Pa. ID No. 47283
`Bryan A. Loose, Esquire
`Pa. ID No. 201385
`LELAND SCHERMER & ASSOCIATES, PC
`Henry W. Oliver Building
`535 Smithfield Street, Third Floor
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`Phone: (412) 642-5000
`Fax: (412) 642-5010
`Email:
`lschermer@schermerlaw.com
`bloose@schermerlaw.com
`James C. Otteson (pro hac vice)
`Phillip W. Marsh (pro hac vice)
`Michael D.K. Nguyen (pro hac vice)
`AGILITY IP LAW LLP
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`-3-
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`149 Commonwealth Drive
`Menlo Park, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 227-4800
`Email:
`jim@agilityiplaw.com
`phil@agilityiplaw.com
`mnguyen@agilityiplaw.com
`
`Michael North (pro hac vice)
`NORTH WEBER & BAUGH LLP
`2479 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 707
`Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Email:
`mnorth@northweber.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Maxim Integrated
`Products, Inc.
`
`
`
`/s/ Bijal V. Vakil
`Samuel W. Braver
`PA I.D. No. 19682
`Ralph G. Fischer
`PA I.D. No. 200793
`BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
`One Oxford Centre
`301 Grant Street, 20th Floor
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1410
`Telephone 412.562.8800
`Facsimile 412.562.1041
`
`Bijal V. Vakil
`CA State Bar No.: 192878
`bvakil@whitecase.com
`Shamita D. Etienne-Cummings
`CA State Bar No.: 202090
`setienne@whitecase.com
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`Five Palo Alto Square 9th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone 650.213.0300
`Facsimile: 650.213.8158
`
`Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and
`JPMORGAN BANK, N.A
`-4-
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Leslie M. Spencer
`Leslie M. Spencer (NY 3927050)
`Jeffrey K. Dicker (NY 4761896)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1211 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 596-9000
`Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
`Leslie.Spencer@ropesgray.com
`Jeffrey.Dicker@ropesgray.com
`
`Kirsten R. Rydstrom (PA 76549)
`REED SMITH LLP
`225 Fifth Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`Telephone: (412) 288-3131
`Facsimile: (412) 288-3063
`krydstrom@reedsmith.com
`
`James R. Myers (DC 231993)
`Sharon Lee (DC 1021539)
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`One Metro Center
`700 12th St., NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 508-4600
`Facsimile: (202) 508-4650
`James.Myers@ropesgray.com
`Sharon.Lee@ropesgray.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
`Branch Banking and Trust Company
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-mc-00244-JFC Document 909 Filed 09/26/14 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on the 26th day of September, 2014 the foregoing
`
`document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which
`
`will issue an electronic notification of filing to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`/s/ William P. Nelson
`William P. Nelson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PALOALTO 161979
`
`
`-6-
`STIPULATION AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS RE USP 5,949,880
`CASE NO. 2:12-MC-00244-JFC
`
`JPMC v. Maxim CBM2014-00180
`CHASE EX. 1017
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
