throbber
ADVENT or MAIL—ORDER PHARMACY
`
`CAUSES CONCERN AMONG SOME PHARMACISTS
`
`David Spurgeon
`
` “B“Effiibffil
`
` major; mmhorde piiar»> ,
` 3 MEQlTruas;
`ca mtg :
`
`:um. magma; gamma
`“mac's. grammes Elatiw. drug prim and '
`Spar: correspondaarce MEDlTruss,’
`”disparaging: rm. for peopfe who: order : ::
`
`
`:gidmgsma mar.
`:le arrwai has araareri
`
`;
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`
`
`oflauxvdepmmou-WL
`.
`>
`..
`5%: la: vantages da'
`
`
`eis’,anpaused:
`[modernist
`
`i 'mdscamaiifii maifima
`_
`_
`
`
`:zsiagsam‘ eria persaanela aux patients. ,
`
`
`
`.
`
`:
`
`.
`
`:
`
`.
`
`Toronto mail—order pharmacy
`called MEDlTrust, which is pro-
`moting its services within the medical
`profession and to businesses, is receiv-
`ing mixed reactions from doctors and
`pharmacists.
`In its promotional literature,
`MEDlTrust emphasizes cost savings.
`It claims that both patients and the
`government health system could
`benefit — patients by as much as
`50% on medication costs and the
`
`Ontario government, for example,
`by up to $100 million annually un-
`der its drug-benefit program.
`
`David Spurgean is a freelance writer living in Mont—Tremblant,
`Que.
`
`To doctors it offers a telephone
`hot line, customized fax sheets for
`patients' prescriptions, an informa-
`tion and ordering kit for waiting
`rooms, centralized patient profiles,
`consultation with its pharmacists
`and other services.
`
`To business, it suggests that
`clients can be made happy through
`cost savings. "You become a hero —
`increased service!" says one of its
`brochures.
`
`Patients are charged a $5 dispens-
`ing fee, compared with the Ontario
`government formulary charge of
`$6.47 and what MEDlTrust calls
`”usual and customary fees" of $7 to
`How does it get business? A
`$14. A 90—day supply of medication
`is provided where appropriate for
`MEDlTrust account manager will
`call a company to promote its
`the same $5 fee. The mark-up is
`“cost-containment pharmacy ser—
`10% on all prescription medications.
`vice." The company,
`in search of
`Generic drugs are promoted, but
`doctor and patient may request
`lower drug costs, advises its em-
`
`
`CAN MED ASSOC] - MAY 1, 1995; 152 (9)
`
`1485
`
`ployees or clients to use the ser-
`vice.
`
`First established in Toronto,
`MEDITrust now also operates in
`.New Brunswick. lts two “superphar-
`macies" are accredited under the reg-
`ulations of the Ontario College of
`Pharmacists and the New Brunswick
`
`Pharmaceutical Society.
`“These facilities are in excess of
`20 000 square feet and are devoted
`exclusively to medication distribu-
`tion," says the company’s Physician
`Information Kit. "Through leading-
`edge technology, MEDlTrust is ca-
`pable of delivering over 20 000 pre-
`scriptions per day. Although [we
`provide] patients with predomi-
`nantly chronic or maintenance med-
`ication, MEDlTrust carries and de-
`livers all
`types of medication,
`including acute-care products. To
`order, patients can mail us their pre-
`scriptions or physicians can phone
`or fax in their prescriptions. [The
`company] is owned and operated by
`pharmacists dedicated to improving
`the service and cost of medication."
`
`
`
`PAR1010
`
`CBM of US. Patent No. 7,668,730
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`brand-name products. Delivery to
`home or workplace is usually made
`'within 2 business days.
`"We are not always the suitable
`choice for an emergency drug and
`our pharmaCists counsel customers
`accordingly," the company advises.
`Leroy Fevang, executive director
`of the Canadian Pharmaceutical As-
`
`sociation (CPA), says the association
`”looks upon mail order as another
`type of pharmacy-delivery service."
`However, MEDITrust has had prob—
`lems
`in Quebec, where
`the
`province's Order of Pharmacists has
`asked at least two Ontario-based
`
`businesses to stop telling their Que-
`bec employees to use its services.
`Quebec pharmacists obtained a
`temporary injunction against the
`company in 1993, when customers
`in the province were being served ‘
`through the firm's New Brunswick
`centre. They claim that MEDITrust
`is not a pharmacy as defined in the
`Quebec Pharmacy Act and, there-
`fore, not entitled to practise in the
`province.
`The injunction was lifted in Janu-
`ary 1994 by the Quebec Superior
`
`Court, but subsequently reinstated
`by the Quebec Court of Appeal. Af—
`ter the reinstatement, the Order of
`Pharmacists wrote to the Canadian
`
`Tire Corporation and Klockner
`Moeller Ltd., asking them to cease
`using MEDITrust. Both companies
`refused.
`
`Last year, the Toronto-Dominion
`Bank withdrew a recommendation
`
`that its employees use MEDITrust,
`saying it had underestimated the im-
`pact the recommendation might
`have on local pharmacists who are
`bank customers.
`
`When a Montreal pharmacist,
`Marcel Dubuc, was licensed by
`MEDITrust to use the company's
`computer system to fill Quebec pre-
`scriptions, officials from the Order
`of Pharmacists made repeated visits,
`seizing prescriptions relating to the
`company. They were later returned.
`MEDITrust's president, Norman
`
`Paul, characterizes actions like that
`as an attempt to limit competition.
`He told the Globe and Mail his com-
`
`the doctor might not even be aware
`of that had been prescribed by an-
`other doctor.”
`
`pany plans to seek leave to appeal to
`the Supreme Court of Canada.
`Fevang qualifies the CPA's accep-
`tance of mail-order pharmacies with
`a caveat: "We do believe that phar—
`macists should provide drug-related
`information to their patients on a
`face-to-face consultation basis rather
`
`than more anonymously or imper-
`sonall‘y over the telephone or
`through written records“ — both
`of which are methods used by
`MEDITrust.
`
`Fevang thinks pharmacists will be
`in a better position to draw conclu-
`sions about customers in a face-to-
`
`face meeting. "This can often play a
`very important part in their respon»
`sible and effective use of the medica-
`tions. We do have that concern .
`.
`.
`
`and anybody who uses the services
`should be aware of that limitation."
`
`Dr. Anne Carter, the CMAs asso-
`ciate director of health care and pro-
`motion, says MEDITrust does pro—
`vide "a certain form of counselling”
`and ”I don't think it matters terribly
`much to the physician whether
`pharmacists are in the community or
`on the end of a phone line some-
`where as long as they are reachable
`and they can be communicated with
`and as long as they perform their
`functions.”
`
`Speaking from the physician’s
`perspective, Carter said “physicians
`need certain functions from the
`
`pharmacist as another health care
`provider, as a member of the team.”
`Those roles are to stock, store and
`dispense medication, provide med-
`ication-related information to pa-
`tients and provide a safety check on
`prescriptions to make sure they pose
`no danger,
`'fDoctors are not infallible," she
`said.
`'They can make errors and it's
`really nice to know that there's an-
`other pair of eyes going over [the
`prescription] and checking it, and
`also looking at other medication that
`
`This drug might be incompatible
`with the new prescription, and a
`pharmacist with a complete record
`pf» the patient's medication could
`spot that immediately.
`.
`”Those are the roles that doctors
`
`I think
`really need pharmacists for.
`MEDITrust could fulfil those roles,
`from what l have seen of how they
`operate, but there are other roles —
`nonprescription drugs, patient coun-
`selling — and I'm not sure they can
`fulfil them. Certainly I know they
`can’t provide medication on very
`short notice."
`Carter said this means the com-
`
`munity pharmacist will still be
`needed, for example, for urgent de-
`livery within an hour or so, and for
`short-term, single prescriptions such
`as an antibiotic.
`
`As for nonprescription drugs,
`Carter said she knows that MEDITrust
`
`stocks them, but this form of medica-
`tion is sold in tremendous volume and
`
`requires a lot of counselling.
`“Patients who think they have a
`minor, self~limiting ailment that
`they're not willing to go see their
`doctor about will very often wander -
`into a pharmacy and discuss .it with
`the pharmacist. It’s a common sce-
`nario, and I don't really know if
`MEDITrust is prepared to fill that
`need.
`I think they stock nonpre-
`scription medication mostly for peo-
`ple who already know what they
`need —— for example, 2225 for ten-
`sion headaches about which they've
`already seen a doctor."
`Fevang said mail-order houses
`hold few implications for the phar-
`maceutical industry, but for the
`pharmacist they provide an opportu-
`nity "to market themselves more ag—
`gressively on the advantages that are
`inherent in the local, face-to-face
`environment, and provide that type
`of tangible service that may have
`been taken for granted in the
`past."-
`
`
`
`
`1406
`CAN MED ASSOC J - 19' MAI 1995; 152 (9)
`
`PAR101O
`
`CBM of US. Patent No. 7,668,730
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket