throbber
Paper No. ____
`Filed: July 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION,
`TD AMERITRADE, INC., and
`TD AMERITRADE ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP.
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2014-00137
`
`U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Further to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD
`
`Ameritrade Inc., and TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp.
`
`Exhibit 2003
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Communications regarding motion to disqualify
`Exhibit 2002
`PTAB Trail Blog-Drinker Biddle “Denying Leave to File Motion
`for Additional Discovery CBM2014-00131, 133, 135, 136, 137.”
`(August 18, 2014)
`Emails Between Parties Relating to Hilmert Memo
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 963, Memorandum Opinion and
`Order (September 12, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 409,
`Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law In Support Of Joint
`Motion For Summary Judgment That The ‘056 Patent Is Invalid
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1 For Lack Of Written Description
`(October 7, 2011)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Open E Cry, LLC et
`al., Case 2012-1583 (Federal Circuit Appeals), Decision (August
`30, 2013)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. GL Trade Americas,
`Inc., FuturePath Trading, LLC et al., Tutorial Presentation (Feb.
`19, 2014)
`Senate Congressional Record S5402, Leahy-Smith America
`Invents Act (September 8, 2011)
`Senate Congressional Record S1360, Patent Reform Act of 2011
`(March 8, 2011)
`Redacted Second Corrected Expert Report of Christopher
`Thomas, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 12, 2013)
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`2
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2013
`
`Exhibit 2014
`
`Exhibit 2015
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132
`Reserved
`
`Exhibit 2020
`Exhibit 2021
`through 2084
`Exhibit 2085 David Rho LinkedIn Profile
`Exhibit 2086
`David Rho MMG Partners Firm Profile
`Exhibit 2087
`Reserved
`Exhibit 2088
`Served
`Exhibit 2089
`Served
`Exhibit 2090
`Served
`Exhibit 2091
`Served
`Exhibit 2092
`Deposition Transcript of David Rho, dated January 27, 2015
`Exhibit 2093
`Deposition Transcript of Courtney O’Connell, dated February
`13, 2015
`Deposition Transcript of Akiko Rosenberry, dated February 16,
`2015
`Deposition Transcript of Maho Taniguchi-Speller, dated
`February 17, 2015
`Deposition Transcript of Ronald Skidmore, dated February 18,
`
`Exhibit 2094
`
`Exhibit 2095
`
`Exhibit 2096
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`2015
`Declaration of Harold Abilock
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Instruction Form (October 10, 2007)
`Declaration of Richard Hartheimer
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Notification of Docket Entry (January 3, 2008)
`Plas-Pak Indus., Inc. v. Sulzer Mixpac AG, No. 2014-1447, 2015
`WL 328222, *3 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2015)
`Reserved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2097
`Exhibit 2098
`
`Exhibit 2099
`
`Exhibit 2100
`Exhibit 2101
`
`Exhibit 2102
`
`Exhibit 2103
`through 2199
`Exhibit 2200
`
`Exhibit 2201
`Exhibit 2202
`
`Exhibit 2203
`
`Exhibit 2204
`Exhibit 2205
`Exhibit 2206
`Exhibit 2207
`Exhibit 2208
`Exhibit 2209
`Exhibit 2210
`
`Exhibit 2211
`Exhibit 2212
`Exhibit 2213
`Exhibit 2214
`
`Exhibit 2215
`Exhibit 2216
`
`
`
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. CQG, 05-cv-4811 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24,
`2015) (Dkt. 1073)
`Reserved
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. CQG, 05-cv-4811, TT 101 Hearing
`Presentation.
`Video showing an example of a screen that centers the inside
`market compared to a claimed style screen
`Bloomberg Product Documentation
`Reuters Product Documentation
`Thinkorswim thinkManual
`CQG Product Documentation
`ORC Product Documentation
`Reserved
`Case Nos. 6:13-CV-447-JRG-KNM, 448-JRGKNM, Smartflash
`LLC v. Apple, Inc., Dkt. 423 at 18, 20 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2015)
`Reserved
`Served
`Served
`Translation of Excerpts from “Futures/Options Trading System
`Guidelines for Operating the Trading Terminals”
`Served
`Translation of Excerpts from document entitled “Refco Docs”
`4
`
`

`
`
`Exhibit 2217
`
`Exhibit 2218
`
`Exhibit 2219
`through 2271
`Exhibit 2272
`Exhibit 2273
`
`Exhibit 2274 to
`Exhibit 2299
`Exhibit 2300
`
`Exhibit 2301
`
`Exhibit 2302
`
`Exhibit 2303
`
`Exhibit 2304
`
`Served
`Documents
`Exhibit 2088
`Exhibit 2089
`Exhibit 2090
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Translation of Excerpts from “Futures/Options Trading System
`Guidelines for Operating the Trading Terminals”
`Translation of Excerpts from “Futures/Options Trading System
`Guidelines for Operating the Trading Terminals”
`Served
`
`Reserved
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1007-1009,
`served December 16, 2014
`Reserved
`
`Confidential Settlement Agreement between TD AmeriTrade
`Holding Corporation, TD AmeriTrade, Inc., and TD AmeriTrade
`Online Holdings Corp. and Trading Technologies International,
`Inc.
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BBC Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 548, Position
`Statement of the Sungard Defendants Concerning TD
`AmeriTrade’s Motion For Stay (May 29, 2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BBC Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No.553, CQG’s
`Position Statement Regarding TD AmeriTrade’s Motion to Stay
`(June 4, 2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BBC Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 558,
`Tradestation Defendants’ Joinder In an Motion for Stay (June 11,
`2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BBC Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 562, Reply
`Memorandum In Support of the IBG Defendants’ Motion To
`Stay Proceedings Pursuant To Section 18(b) of the America
`Invents Act (June 18, 2014)
`
`
`Description
`
`Investopedia Definition “brand”
`Kenkyusha Online Dictionary Definition “meigara”
`Kenkyusha’s New Japanese-English Dictionary (4th Ed., 1974)
`5
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit 2091
`Exhibit 2212
`Exhibit 2213
`Exhibit 2215
`
`Exhibit 2219
`
`Exhibit 2220
`
`Exhibit 2221
`
`Exhibit 2222
`
`Exhibit 2223
`
`Exhibit 2224
`
`Exhibit 2225
`
`Exhibit 2226
`
`Exhibit 2227
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`“meigara”
`Second Declaration of Ronald E. Skidmore
`Declaration of Jay Q. Knoblock
`Declaration of Cory C. Bell
`Translation of Excerpts from System for Buying and Selling
`Futures and Options Transaction Terminal Operational
`Guidelines
`Responses to Trading Technologies’ First Set of Interrogatories
`to CQG and CQGT, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v.
`CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`Responses to Trading Technologies’ Second Set of
`Interrogatories to CQG and CQGT (No. 14), Trading
`Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-
`CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`Expert Report of Robert Dezmelyk, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed, International, Ltd.,
`and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.,)
`CQG’s Amended Responses and Objections to TT’s Second Set
`of Interrogatories, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v.
`CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`CQG’s Objections and Responses to TT’s Amended
`Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies International,
`Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`CQG’s First Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Second Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Third Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Fifth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`
`6
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit 2228
`
`Exhibit 2229
`
`Exhibit 2230
`
`Exhibit 2231
`
`Exhibit 2232
`
`Exhibit 2233
`
`Exhibit 2234
`
`Exhibit 2235
`
`Exhibit 2236
`
`Exhibit 2237
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Sixth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Seventh Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Eighth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Ninth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Tenth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Eleventh Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Twelfth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Nineteenth Amended Objections and Responses to TT’s
`Amended Interrogatory Nos. 17-21, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D.
`Ill.)
`CQG’s Second Set of Interrogatories to Trading Technologies,
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., Case No.
`1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`Redacted Trading Technologies International, Inc. v CQG, Inc.,
`7
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit 2238
`
`Exhibit 2239
`Exhibit 2240
`
`Exhibit 2241
`
`Exhibit 2242
`Exhibit 2243
`
`Exhibit 2244
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 898, CQG’s
`Opening Brief Regarding the Patent-Ineligibility/Invalidity of the
`TT Patents-in-Suit under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Feb. 2, 2015)
`Declaration of Richard Hartheimer, Trading Technologies
`International, Inc. v. BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 1:10-CV-
`00715 (N.D. Ill.,) (Dkt. No. 396)
`Trading with CQG Integrated Client (Oct. 11, 2010, Version 8.3)
`Directory of Software Solutions for LIFFE CONNECT™ (June
`1999, Issue 3)
`Directory of Software Solutions for LIFFE CONNECT™ (Feb.
`1999, Issue 2)
`LIFFE Directory of Access Solutions (May 2001)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Robert S. Dezmelyk, dated Aug.
`17, 2007, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed,
`Inc., eSpeed, International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No.
`1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Trading Technologies News Release, “TT’s Open Letter to the
`Future Industry” (Jan. 9, 2006)
`Conventional Order Ticket
`Exhibit 2245
`Conventional Working Order Book
`Exhibit 2246
`September 1998 Drawing
`Exhibit 2247
`September 1998 Drawing
`Exhibit 2248
`September 1998 Drawing
`Exhibit 2249
`Screen Space Comparison
`Exhibit 2250
`Screen Space Comparison
`Exhibit 2251
`Chasing the Market vs. Hitting the Inside Market
`Exhibit 2252
`Exhibit 2253 MD Trader’s Inside Market Can Leave the Screen
`Exhibit 2254
`Conventional Electronic Trading Screens
`Exhibit 2255
`Video Deposition Transcript of Richard Ferraro, dated July 28,
`2006, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`eSpeed, International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-
`CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Transcript of Proceedings for EPO 01620183.9
`Steidlmayer, J.P. and Steven B. Hawkings, Steidlmayer on
`markets: Trading with market profile. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley,
`
`Exhibit 2256
`Exhibit 2257
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`
`
`
`Exhibit 2258
`
`Exhibit 2259
`
`Exhibit 2260
`
`Exhibit 2261
`
`Exhibit 2262
`
`Exhibit 2263
`Exhibit 2264
`
`Exhibit 2265
`
`Exhibit 2266
`
`Exhibit 2267
`Exhibit 2268
`Exhibit 2269
`Exhibit 2270
`Exhibit 2271
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2003. 202-213.
`Video Deposition Transcript of Per Hjartoy, dated July 20, 2006,
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Per Hjartoy, dated Dec. 8, 2011,
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. GL Trade SA, et al.,
`Case No. 05-cv-04120 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Scott L. Johnston, dated June 27,
`2006, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.,et
`al.., Case No. 1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Maxim Katin, dated May 23,
`2013, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Maxim Katin, dated Dec. 4,
`2014, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`GL Quicktrade: Internal Product News
`Video Deposition Transcript of David L. Silverman, Aug. 24,
`2007, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`eSpeed, International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-
`CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Anthony J. Stavros, dated Dec.
`12, 2012, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:05-CV-04811 (N.D. Ill.)
`Video Deposition Transcript of Christopher Thomas, dated Aug.
`14, 2007, Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed,
`Inc.,et al., Case No. 1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.)
`Garrow Deposition Testimony Excerpt, p. 3356 - 3357
`Garrow Deposition Testimony Excerpt, p. 3494-3495
`CME Facts and Figures
`Corrected Expert Report of Christopher Thomas
`Second Corrected Expert Report of Christopher Thomas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 5, 2015
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joshua L. Goldberg/
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 59,369
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00137
` U.S. Patent 7,685,055
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibits were served on July 5, 2015, via
`
`email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Jonathan M. Strang
`jstrang-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Ashley F. Cheung/
`Ashley F. Cheung
`Case Manager
`
`
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket