`United States District Court, Northern District ofiUinois
`.
`Suzanne B. Conlon
`04 c 6740
`--
`TRADING TECHNOWGIES INTL vs. KINGSTREE TRADING
`
`N•lllll or Assigned Judge
`or Ma~:lstrate Jud~:e
`
`CASE NUMBER
`
`CASE
`TITLE
`
`Sitting Judge If Other
`than As!lgned Judge
`
`DATE
`
`10/21/2004
`
`-·-
`
`MOTION:
`
`[In Itt~ following bcx (a) indicnlc the party filing the motion, e g., pfnintilf. defendant, Jrd partyplninliff, nnd (b)srntcbricfly thena~
`of the motion being presented ]
`
`DOCKET ENTRY:
`r------------··-·------------------------.
`0
`Filed motion of [ use listing in "Motion" box above"]
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`(6)
`
`{7)
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`D
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Brief in support of motion due ___ .
`
`Answer brief to motion due __ . Reply to answer brief due __ .
`
`Ruling/Hearing on--· set for ___ at __ .
`
`Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re·6et for] on ___ set for __ at--··
`
`Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set forJ on __ set for ___ at __ .
`
`Trial[ set for/re-set for] on ___ at __ .
`
`[Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to __ at __ .
`
`This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice nnd without costs[by/agreementfpursuant to]
`OFRCP4(m) 0Lo(:a1Rule4II OFRCP4l(a)(l) OFRCP41(a)(2).
`
`(10)
`
`II
`[Other docket entry]
`JUDGMENT.
`
`This action is dismissed pursuant to settlement. ENTER CONSENT
`
`--~·-------.11!'""-~----1
`Poelim~nt
`Ndinb~(
`:'•} . : ' •
`;_:
`
`I >: ~
`
`'
`
`tltunhcr nfmlic=
`
`II
`No notices required, advised in open court
`
`[For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]
`
`No notices required
`
`Notices mailed by judge's s!llCf,
`
`Notified counsel by telephone
`
`Docketing to mail notices
`
`Mnll AO 450 fonn
`
`Copy to judgdmagistmte judge
`
`CB
`
`courtroom
`deputy's
`initials
`
`(ll)
`
`- 1
`
`---
`1 -
`
`7 ' -
`-
`
`TT0055508
`TTX00055508
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2064
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00136
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed ·1 0/21/2004 Page 2 of 6
`
`UNTI'ED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF H..LJNOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`DU~~(fftD
`OCT 2 2 2004
`
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Kingstree Trading L.L.C.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. 04 C 6740
`
`Judge Conlon
`
`Magistrate Judge Ashman
`
`CONSENT .JUDGMENT
`
`As a result of settlement of this action by virtue of a settlement agreement
`
`between the parties dated October 20, 2004 which shall become effective upon entry of
`
`this Consent Judgment and upon consent of Plaintiff, Trading Technologies Jntemational,
`
`Inc. (''IT') and Defendant, Kingstree Trading L.L.C. e'KJNGSTREE"), judgment is
`
`hereby entered against KINGSTREE upon 'IT's Complaint, and it is hereby ORDERED,
`
`ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:
`
`L
`
`TI commenced this action for patent infringement against KINGSTREE on
`
`October 19, 2004, alleging that KINGSTREE infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304
`
`("'304 patent .. ) and 6,772,132 (.., 132 patent"). KINGSTREE has received and reviewed
`
`a copy of the Complaint filed by TI in this action.
`
`1
`
`TT0055509
`TTX00055509
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 3 of 6
`
`2.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject
`
`matter of the Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`TT is the sole and exclusive owner of the '304 patent and the '132 patent. and has
`
`the right to sue upon, ;md recover damages for past infringement and enjoin future
`
`infringement of the '304 and '132 patents.
`
`4,
`
`5.
`
`All claims of the •304 and '132 patents are valid and enforceable.
`
`KINGSTREE has directly infringed the '304 and '132 patents by making and
`
`using electronic trading software currently referred to as "KINGSTREE's user interface
`
`software developed by Kingstree for Trading," screenshots included in Exhibit A.
`
`6,
`
`Defendant KINGSTREE, its officers, directors, partners, members, affiliates,
`
`subsidiaries, assigns, and successors~in-interest are hereby permanently enjoined during
`
`the terms of the '304 and '132 patents from the making, using, selling, offering for sale,
`
`importing and otherwise distributing in the United States the electronic trading software
`
`products referred to in paragraph 5 above.
`
`7.
`
`Any claims of infringement that TT has against KINGSTREE based on
`
`KJNGSTREE's use and/or distribution of electronic trading software provided by any
`
`third party software provider prior to entry of this judgment are dismissed without
`
`prejudice. The parties have addressed this issue in the Settlement Agreement by TT
`
`granting to KINGSTREE a limited covenant not to sue" TT is not waiving any rights to
`
`assert the '304 and '132 patents against KINGSTREE based on KINGSTREE's use
`
`and/or distribution of such third party software in the future if the limited covenant not to
`
`2
`
`TT0055510
`TTX00055510
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed 1 0/21/2004 Page 4 of 6
`
`....
`
`sue is ternrlnated. KINGSTREE is not waiving any rights to assert that such third party
`
`software does not infringe the '304 and '132 patents if the limited covenant not to sue is
`
`terminated.
`
`8.
`
`TI waives its rights to damages from KINGSTREE arising from the manufacture,
`
`use, sale or offers to sell the electronic trading software products referred to in paragraph
`
`5 above prior to entry of this Judgment.
`
`9.
`
`Notwithstanding the terms of this Consent Judgment, KINGSTREE expressly
`
`reserves the right to contest infringement if the KINGSTREE software is modified so as
`
`to not infringe the patents-in-suit. In the event that KINGSTREE contests infringement
`
`based on KINGSTREE software that is modified, TI reserves the right to assert any and
`
`all claims against KINGSTREE including without limitation a claim of contempt of court
`
`based on a violation of this Consent Judgment in the event that the Court finds there is no
`
`colorable difference between the modified K.JNGSTREE software and the software that is
`
`the subject of this Consent Judgment
`
`10.
`
`This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case for purposes of enforcing the
`
`Consent Judgment and the Settlement Agreement between the parties pursuant to which
`
`the Consent Judgment is iiled"
`
`1 L
`
`Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
`
`~i?l.~
`
`. Conlon
`Suzanne
`United States District Court Judge
`
`3
`
`TT0055511
`TTX00055511
`
`SO ORDERED j /o I'/
`
`Dated: L {)
`I
`
`/ '() 1
`I
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`-
`
`Case 1:04Mcv-06740 Document 4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 5 of 6
`
`AGREED TO:
`
`Dated:
`
`I o{'JQ (~ (
`
`Dated:
`
`)
`8
`Paul H. Berghoff (ID No.
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr. (ID No. 6204980)
`Matthew J. Sampson (ID No. 6207606)
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert
`& Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Clricago,EL 60606
`Tel.: (312) 913-0001
`Fax: (312) 913-0002
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES
`INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`KINGSTREE TRADING, L.L.C.
`
`4
`
`TT0055512
`TTX00055512
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`. -
`
`Case 1:04-cv-06740 Document4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 6 of6
`
`~
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`!-'-
`
`TT0055513
`TTX00055513
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`