throbber
DECLARATION OF PAUL R.T. JOHNSON, JR.
`
`I, Paul R.T. Johnson, Jr., declare that:
`
`I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a witness,
`1.
`I could and would testify thereto of my own personal knowledge.
`
`I have over 20 years experience in the trading world. In 1985, I began an
`2.
`execution group trading and filling institutional customer orders on the Chicago Board of
`Trade ("CBOT") until I sold the business to ING in approximately 1998.
`
`In 2001, I became CEO ofBoston Cabot LLC. Boston Cabot is a futures trading
`3.
`firm and a broker/dealer. In 2003, I became CEO ofBC Trading LLC, a hedge fund that
`focuses on trading certain stock index futures and the 1 0 year treasury futures. I am
`currently the CEO and majority shareholder ofboth Boston Cabot and BC Trading. Both
`Boston Cabot and BC Trading are located in Chicago, Illinois.
`
`I was formerly on the board of directors of the CBOT and was Chairman of
`4.
`Floors and Chairman of Market and Product Development for the CBOT. In this role, I
`helped create the Dow Jones futures products, rewrote the treasury complex contracts and
`helped launch the Fed Funds futures.
`
`I saw an early demonstration ofTT's MD Trader product around the time that the
`5.
`product was launched. I remember that the product looked much different than the
`standard order entry screens in existence at the time. In particular, market information
`was displayed relative to a fixed or static column of prices such that the trader could
`visualize movement of the market. Also, it provided for simple and accurate order entry.
`
`I started using TT's MD Trader to trade electronically near the end of2001. Once
`6.
`I started using the product, I saw how much better it was than the preexisting order entry
`screens. In particular, it provided for the ability to enter orders quickly without the same
`error problems that existed in the previous screens. This was so because the prices
`remained fixed and there was no risk of the prices changing while attempting to enter an
`order like there was in the preexisting screens. Also, the static nature of the prices
`allowed the trader to see the flow of the market depth much easier through a more
`intuitive screen. The one-click recentering feature of MD Trader was also very valuable
`because it allowed the trader to quickly bring the display of the market to the center of
`the screen. I had never seen any of these features in preexisting electronic trading tools.
`
`Because of the more intuitive trading screen and the improved fast and accurate
`7.
`order entry and management, the MD Trader screen increases the speed in which traders
`
`1
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2028
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00136
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`can react to opportunities and enter trades. Such speed is a critical issue for electronic
`traders. Anything that allows a trader to decrease the time it takes to recognize an
`opportunity and send an order to the exchange is invaluable.
`
`After TT launched MD Trader, I am aware that competitors ofTT released
`8.
`screens that duplicated the static price, the improved order entry and the recentering
`features of MD Trader. One such competitor, Patsystems, attempted to sell me its
`product by pitching the fact that it had a product (called the Dome screen) that functioned
`like MD Trader.
`
`I declare under penalty of peijury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July
`___2B_, 2004.
`
`..
`
`p
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket