throbber
DECLARATION OF DAVID ELLIS
`
`I, David Elli~, declare that:
`
`I am personally familiar with the facts set forth herein, and, if called as a witness,
`1.
`I could avd would testify thereto of my own personal knowledge.
`
`I started my career as a professional trader over 27 years ago. In 1977, I started
`2.
`trading on the open-outcry floor of the Mi.dAmerica exchange in Chicago, where I t:aded
`mini contracts on hogs, cattle and grain. From around 1978n9 until 1996, I traded at
`various times on the floors of the Chicago Board of Trade ("CBOT") and the Chicago
`Mercantile Exchange (''CME''). In the mid 1990s I started trading electronically on
`Globex, the C!\.1E' s electronic trading platform.
`
`3.
`Near the end of 1996, I founded DE Trading, a proprietary trading firm, and also
`started trading e1ectronically on Eurex. At that time, I became a customer of Trading
`Technologies ("TI"). The firm started with 3 traders, all trading electronically on Eurex.
`Today, DE Trading has around 90 traders trading electronically. I am President of DE
`Trading and International Trading Group, both of which are located in Glenview, lliino]s.
`
`I saw TT's MD Tradet· product when it was first released in around the fall of
`4.
`2000. Prior to seeing MD Trader, I was aware of a wide variety of electronic trading
`software platforms, including TT's previous software, the Burex green screen, the Globex
`front-end, and software sold by GL, EasyScreen, Yes Trader and other vendors.
`
`MD Trader provided for a fast one-click order entry mechanism that was accurate
`5.
`in that the trader could be confident in the order going in at the intended price. This was
`accomplished by allowing the trader to click to send orders in cells aligned with prices
`that remained static on the screen. In previous systems of which I was aware, the prices
`would move on the screen wher, the market changed. If this happened at the moment a
`trader entered a click, the order would be sent in at an unintended price. MD Trader also
`provided a visual format in which market data was displayed against the static prices such
`that the data wonld move up and down the screen. I had never seen these features before
`MD Trader.
`
`The improved order entry reduces mistakes. Also, the visual fotmat of MD
`6.
`Trader allows traders to easily see relative movements of multiple products when
`multiple MD Trader windows are displayed side-by-side (for example, when spreading
`two or more products). In my opinion, these features provide an important benefit to the
`trader. Relatively quickly after MD Trader was first available, the vast majority of the
`traders at DE Trading were using MD Trader a.s their primary order entry and
`
`1
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2021
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00136
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`•
`
`management tool. In my experience, it is very rare for a trader to start using MD Trader
`and then go back to using an older styJe trading screen.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
`September JL. 2004.
`
`fjy{fl);
`
`David Ellis
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket