throbber
Mlnull! Onltt Form (06/!17) Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 1 of 6
`United States District Court, Northern District ofiUinois
`.
`Suzanne B. Conlon
`04 c 6740
`--
`TRADING TECHNOWGIES INTL vs. KINGSTREE TRADING
`
`N•lllll or Assigned Judge
`or Ma~:lstrate Jud~:e
`
`CASE NUMBER
`
`CASE
`TITLE
`
`Sitting Judge If Other
`than As!lgned Judge
`
`DATE
`
`10/21/2004
`
`-·-
`
`MOTION:
`
`[In Itt~ following bcx (a) indicnlc the party filing the motion, e g., pfnintilf. defendant, Jrd partyplninliff, nnd (b)srntcbricfly thena~
`of the motion being presented ]
`
`DOCKET ENTRY:
`r------------··-·------------------------.
`0
`Filed motion of [ use listing in "Motion" box above"]
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`(6)
`
`{7)
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`D
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Brief in support of motion due ___ .
`
`Answer brief to motion due __ . Reply to answer brief due __ .
`
`Ruling/Hearing on--· set for ___ at __ .
`
`Status hearing[held/continued to] [set for/re·6et for] on ___ set for __ at--··
`
`Pretrial conference[held/continued to] [set for/re-set forJ on __ set for ___ at __ .
`
`Trial[ set for/re-set for] on ___ at __ .
`
`[Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] held/continued to __ at __ .
`
`This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice nnd without costs[by/agreementfpursuant to]
`OFRCP4(m) 0Lo(:a1Rule4II OFRCP4l(a)(l) OFRCP41(a)(2).
`
`(10)
`
`II
`[Other docket entry]
`JUDGMENT.
`
`This action is dismissed pursuant to settlement. ENTER CONSENT
`
`--~·-------.11!'""-~----1
`Poelim~nt
`Ndinb~(
`:'•} . : ' •
`;_:
`
`I >: ~
`
`'
`
`tltunhcr nfmlic=
`
`II
`No notices required, advised in open court
`
`[For further detail see order attached to the original minute order.]
`
`No notices required
`
`Notices mailed by judge's s!llCf,
`
`Notified counsel by telephone
`
`Docketing to mail notices
`
`Mnll AO 450 fonn
`
`Copy to judgdmagistmte judge
`
`CB
`
`courtroom
`deputy's
`initials
`
`(ll)
`
`- 1
`
`---
`1 -
`
`7 ' -
`-
`
`TT0055508
`TTX00055508
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2064
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00135
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed ·1 0/21/2004 Page 2 of 6
`
`UNTI'ED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF H..LJNOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`DU~~(fftD
`OCT 2 2 2004
`
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Kingstree Trading L.L.C.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. 04 C 6740
`
`Judge Conlon
`
`Magistrate Judge Ashman
`
`CONSENT .JUDGMENT
`
`As a result of settlement of this action by virtue of a settlement agreement
`
`between the parties dated October 20, 2004 which shall become effective upon entry of
`
`this Consent Judgment and upon consent of Plaintiff, Trading Technologies Jntemational,
`
`Inc. (''IT') and Defendant, Kingstree Trading L.L.C. e'KJNGSTREE"), judgment is
`
`hereby entered against KINGSTREE upon 'IT's Complaint, and it is hereby ORDERED,
`
`ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:
`
`L
`
`TI commenced this action for patent infringement against KINGSTREE on
`
`October 19, 2004, alleging that KINGSTREE infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304
`
`("'304 patent .. ) and 6,772,132 (.., 132 patent"). KINGSTREE has received and reviewed
`
`a copy of the Complaint filed by TI in this action.
`
`1
`
`TT0055509
`TTX00055509
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 3 of 6
`
`2.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject
`
`matter of the Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`TT is the sole and exclusive owner of the '304 patent and the '132 patent. and has
`
`the right to sue upon, ;md recover damages for past infringement and enjoin future
`
`infringement of the '304 and '132 patents.
`
`4,
`
`5.
`
`All claims of the •304 and '132 patents are valid and enforceable.
`
`KINGSTREE has directly infringed the '304 and '132 patents by making and
`
`using electronic trading software currently referred to as "KINGSTREE's user interface
`
`software developed by Kingstree for Trading," screenshots included in Exhibit A.
`
`6,
`
`Defendant KINGSTREE, its officers, directors, partners, members, affiliates,
`
`subsidiaries, assigns, and successors~in-interest are hereby permanently enjoined during
`
`the terms of the '304 and '132 patents from the making, using, selling, offering for sale,
`
`importing and otherwise distributing in the United States the electronic trading software
`
`products referred to in paragraph 5 above.
`
`7.
`
`Any claims of infringement that TT has against KINGSTREE based on
`
`KJNGSTREE's use and/or distribution of electronic trading software provided by any
`
`third party software provider prior to entry of this judgment are dismissed without
`
`prejudice. The parties have addressed this issue in the Settlement Agreement by TT
`
`granting to KINGSTREE a limited covenant not to sue" TT is not waiving any rights to
`
`assert the '304 and '132 patents against KINGSTREE based on KINGSTREE's use
`
`and/or distribution of such third party software in the future if the limited covenant not to
`
`2
`
`TT0055510
`TTX00055510
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 1 :04-cv-067 40 Document 4 Filed 1 0/21/2004 Page 4 of 6
`
`....
`
`sue is ternrlnated. KINGSTREE is not waiving any rights to assert that such third party
`
`software does not infringe the '304 and '132 patents if the limited covenant not to sue is
`
`terminated.
`
`8.
`
`TI waives its rights to damages from KINGSTREE arising from the manufacture,
`
`use, sale or offers to sell the electronic trading software products referred to in paragraph
`
`5 above prior to entry of this Judgment.
`
`9.
`
`Notwithstanding the terms of this Consent Judgment, KINGSTREE expressly
`
`reserves the right to contest infringement if the KINGSTREE software is modified so as
`
`to not infringe the patents-in-suit. In the event that KINGSTREE contests infringement
`
`based on KINGSTREE software that is modified, TI reserves the right to assert any and
`
`all claims against KINGSTREE including without limitation a claim of contempt of court
`
`based on a violation of this Consent Judgment in the event that the Court finds there is no
`
`colorable difference between the modified K.JNGSTREE software and the software that is
`
`the subject of this Consent Judgment
`
`10.
`
`This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case for purposes of enforcing the
`
`Consent Judgment and the Settlement Agreement between the parties pursuant to which
`
`the Consent Judgment is iiled"
`
`1 L
`
`Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
`
`~i?l.~
`
`. Conlon
`Suzanne
`United States District Court Judge
`
`3
`
`TT0055511
`TTX00055511
`
`SO ORDERED j /o I'/
`
`Dated: L {)
`I
`
`/ '() 1
`I
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`-
`
`Case 1:04Mcv-06740 Document 4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 5 of 6
`
`AGREED TO:
`
`Dated:
`
`I o{'JQ (~ (
`
`Dated:
`
`)
`8
`Paul H. Berghoff (ID No.
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr. (ID No. 6204980)
`Matthew J. Sampson (ID No. 6207606)
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert
`& Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive
`Clricago,EL 60606
`Tel.: (312) 913-0001
`Fax: (312) 913-0002
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES
`INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`KINGSTREE TRADING, L.L.C.
`
`4
`
`TT0055512
`TTX00055512
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`. -
`
`Case 1:04-cv-06740 Document4 Filed 10/21/2004 Page 6 of6
`
`~
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`!-'-
`
`TT0055513
`TTX00055513
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket