throbber
TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2019
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00133
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`the standard order entry screens that were prevalent at the time — screens that displayed
`the market information in a normal order book fashion.
`
`I started using TT’s MD Trader right around the time that TT launched it as a
`8.
`product. Once I started using the product, I knew that this was a great idea. The product
`proved to be a huge improvement over the trading tools that existed at the time. The
`static nature of the prices allowed the trader to see the movements in the market depth
`much easier through a more intuitive screen. This allowed a trader to recognize
`opportunities much quicker. Also, MD Trader provided for the ability to quickly enter
`orders at various price levels without the possibility of error because there was no risk of
`the prices changing while the trader was attempting to enter an order with the mouse.
`The one-click recentering feature of MD Trader was also very valuable because it
`allowed the trader to quickly bring the display of the market to the center of the screen. I
`had never seen any of these features in preexisting electronic trading tools.
`
`Because of the more intuitive trading screen and the improved fast and reliable
`9.
`order entry and management, the MD Trader screen allows for traders to react much
`more quickly to fast changing market conditions than the preexisting systems. Speed is a
`critical issue for electronic traders. Anything that allows a trader to decrease the time it
`takes to recognize an opportunity and send an order to the exchange is invaluable. One
`of the most impressive things about MD Trader is the fact that prior to its release traders
`did not even perceive a problem with the old tools they were using. It was not until
`seeing the benefits of MD Trader, did they realized the shortcomings of the old order
`book type screens.
`
`After TT launched MD Trader, many competitors of TT released screens that
`10.
`duplicated the static price, the improved order entry and the recentering features of MD
`Trader. In fact, most independent software vendors (“ISVs”) have come out with a copy
`of the MD Trader screen. These competitors needed to do this because potential
`customers, such as myself, told them that TT’s MD Trader screen was far superior from
`their traditional order book type screens. In fact, I told representatives from competitors
`of TT, including Patsystems and Eccoware, that they should not even bother trying to
`pitch me their systems until they put a screen like MD Trader into their product.
`
`At the time of the MD Trader launch, I recall being surprised that Harris
`11.
`Brumfield permitted TT to launch MD Trader as a product as opposed to keeping the
`technology for himself.
`I believe that it is likely that if Harris Brumfield had not decided
`to permit TT to put MD Trader out there, we would still be using traditional order book
`type screens today as the standard way of doing order entry.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July
`Z Z , 2004.
`
`Ray a man
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket