throbber
TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2008
`TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies
`CBM2014-00133
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`
`9/2/2014
`
`Crain's Eureka Index ranks Chicago's most innovative firms - Focus - Crain's Chicago Business
`
`N
`
`ET-A-POI’-\TER.C.O
`
`M
`
`Chicago-based Trading Technologies pulled off a rare trifecta in Crain's annual look at the most
`innovative companies in Illinois based on patent activity, a ranking that weighs both quantity and
`quality: It was in the top 10 for total patent output among Illinois companies last year and in the
`top 20 for quality of patents issued. It also had the highest patent output per employee among 70
`companies that had at least three patents.
`
`/ i_'' (.1 ]'t}"}"2.-if?
`/5?.-'l'?"t..-E? r)n.I__l;
`
`A
`
`SHOP Now >
`
`I PITEIII PITHEII
`
`Innovation is about quality as well
`as quantity. Ocean Tomo LLC rated
`firms’ patent portfolios based on
`the likelihood they'll be put to use.
`Number
`PAIIEIII 0l|fiL|T’I' SWIIE
`of pate nts
`Cummins Allison Inc.
`
`Alltech Associates Inc.
`
`.h.
`
`6|
`
`6'5
`
`.h.
`
`E"\-D
`
`Groupon Inc.
`
`llosltata Inc.
`
`Hal|Star Co.
`
`I-lidtronics Inc.
`
`Pacliv Cor .
`
`I H
`
`os ira Inc.
`! I6
`North ale-Technolo ies Inc.
`E a
`'Il'ideo‘et Technolo ies Inc.
`T 1»
`Abbott Laboratories
`
`T 50?
`H dro-GearLP
`T 22
`
`Crain's also sought out the most innovative
`individuals, with a look at the most prolific patent
`producers over the past generation. Michael Burns,
`Trading Technologies’ vice president of R&D, is
`among the biggest patent winners in the Chicago
`area, with 100 since 1980, according to data
`gathered for Crain's by Deborah Strumsky, a
`professor at the University of North Carolina at
`Charlotte. (See “Mr.
`|nnovation,” this issue.)
`
`“Trading Technologies has been a catalyst for firms
`like CME and CBOE to have a greater appreciation
`about the importance of patents in their industry,”
`says James Malackowski, CEO of Ocean Tomo,
`which specializing in valuing intellectual property.
`
`Trading Technologies also has used patents to keep
`rivals at bay or make them pay. And now the firm is
`looking for ways to use technology to slow trades
`down and prevent the next flash crash.
`
`“For the first time since electronic trading first
`existed, the innovation is notjust around being
`faster,” says Rick Lane, Trading Technologies’ chief
`technology officer. "Now innovation is in risk-
`helping people trade safer.”
`
`Not all patents are created equal. Ocean Tomo
`evaluates patents based on the likelihood that
`companies will maintain and invest in them.
`
`The company with the highest Eureka Index score for
`patents issued last year was Cummins Allison, a
`Mount Prospect company that makes currency-
`counting equipment. It's followed by laboratory-
`equipment maker Alltech Associates Inc. in Deerfield
`and Chicago's Groupon lnc., which scored high
`largely for patents it acquired from Price|ine.com
`founder Jay Walker.
`
`Two of the top 10 companies are in specialty
`chemicals—Coskata lnc., a Warrenville-based
`Page 2 of 5
`http://vwwv.chi cag o
`usiness.corn/arti cl e/201 30427/ISSU E02/304279995/crains-eurele-index-rants-chicag os-most-innovative-firms
`
`25
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`9/2/2014
`
`Crain's Eureka Index ranks Chicago's most innovative firms - Focus - Crain's Chicago Business
`JPI-Ior an Chase E E0. (Bank Une)
`
`ethanol maker, and Chicago-based Ha||Star.
`Ha||Star's additives are used in everything from cars
`to cosmetics to help products resist breaking down in
`the sun. It operates the world's leading photostability
`center; customers include 3M Co., Procter & Gamble
`Co. and Johnson & Johnson.
`
`“We're working on cool stuff that makes products
`better, doing chemistry-based solutions that matter,”
`CEO John Paro says.
`
`Another sector that stands out is life sciences. Three
`
`of the top 15 companies in the Eureka Index are in
`pharmaceuticals or medical devices and products:
`Abbott, Hospira Inc. and Northgate Technologies Inc.
`
`Elgin-based Northgate, best known for products
`used to deliver gases to surgical patients, is working
`on an aerosol to help reduce scar tissue.
`
`“|t's a $1 billion problem," says Bob Mantell, general
`manager of Northgate, a 38-employee division of
`Trudell Medical International of London, Ontario.
`
`SERIOUS GAMING
`
`Foodf ui mentTe-chnolo ies Co.
`
`Traclin Technolo ies International Inc.
`
`I2
`
`Zebra Techno-Io ies Cor
`.
`fi I3
`CMEGrou Inc.
`T as
`E: erianlnlarltetin Solutions Inc.
`
`6
`
`Schumacher Electric Corp.
`
`To uc hSensor Technologies [LE2
`
`Chicaqo Board Options Exchange Inc.
`
`.hu
`
`BI-
`
`65
`
`36
`
`I2
`
`.hu
`
`Few companies take innovation as seriously as WMS
`Gaming Inc. About one-third of the company's 1,500
`U.S. employees work in research and development.
`About two-thirds of them work in a $40 million tech
`
`center in Chicago's Avondale neighborhood. The
`company spends 16 percent of revenue on R&D.
`
`Cleversafe Inc.
`
`I-Iiddleby Corp.
`
`Tellatis Inc.
`
`WMS, which started out making pinball machines,
`makes slot machines that are as cutting-edge as any
`video games, crammed with networking and mobile
`technologies. Today, its slot machines are
`networked, and the company launched Jackpot Party
`Social Casino, one of the most popular games on
`Facebook. WMS is being acquired by Scientific
`Games Corp.
`
`“We've got one of the largest patent portfolios in the
`industry," says Larry Pacey, chief innovation officer.
`
`With 203 patents, WMS was the fifth-most-active
`Illinois company last year—when more patents were
`awarded than ever. Of the dozen most prolific
`individual patent winners in Illinois, seven were from
`WMS, according to Ocean Tomo.
`
`GRAPHIC: The top 30 patent recipients in
`Illinois
`
`GRAPHIC: Small but mighty innovators
`
`WnI.1I'Jri
`
`Ie Jr. Co. (Mars Inc.)
`
`We-oclhead Industries Inc.
`
`Pol era Corp.
`T a
`Derin er-Ile Inc.
`% a
`I-Iere Healthcare Inc.
`llIl.II
`
`5
`
`Baxter International Inc.
`
`Source: Ocean Tomo LLC
`
`3
`
`“|nnovative companies are coming to realize that innovating is, by itself, not enough,” says
`Jonathan Masur, a professor and patent-law specialist at the University of Chicago Law School.
`“They have to innovate and patent, or they leave themselves vulnerable to competitors who
`obtain patents. Firms have also begun to see patents as an important profit source, rather than
`just a sidelight to their other businesses."
`
`WMS learned those lessons the hard way.
`
`"We had some IP battles in the late "90s and early 2000s that we were on the wrong side of,“ Mr.
`Pacey says. “We learned we needed to be better-equipped with the right portfolio.”
`
`WMS was doing groundbreaking work on touch screens before the iPhone was released. It
`licenses that technology to
`
`Page 3 of 5
`http://vwwv.chi cag 0
`usiness.com/arti cl e/201 30427/ISSU E02/304279995/crains-eurele-index-ranls-chicag os-rnost-innovative-firms
`
`3/5
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`Crain's Eureka Index ranks Chicago's most innovative firms - Focus - Crain's Chicago Business
`
`9/2/2014
`manufacturers in the medical
`and aviation industries.
`
`It's not slowing down. WMS
`already has received as
`many patents this year as it
`did in all of 2012.
`
`“We've been successful at
`
`creating entirely new
`products in this category," Mr.
`Pacey says. “We've got
`artists, designers, Ph.D.
`mathematicians, engineers
`who all work to create games.
`We work with movie studios.
`
`This place reeks of
`creativity.”
`Editor's note: The Eureka Index has
`been updated to correct Ideal
`Industries‘ information. Ideal ranks
`19th, with two patents per 100
`employees.
`
`Larry Pacey, chief innovation officer, WMS Industries
`John R. Boehm
`
`FOCUS
`Crain's 2013 EUREKA INDEX
`
`City of big ideas
`Small or large, public or priwite, Crain's second-annual Eureka Index uses patents to rank Chicago's most
`innoxative companies. In an industry where billions of dollars can be made or lost in the blink of an eye,
`Chicago-based Trading Technologies pulled off a rare trifecta.
`
`Mr. Innovation
`Specializing in everything from chemical catalysts to garage door openers ("lt's surprising how much
`technology is in a garage door"), here are profiles of Chicago's most prolific inventors.
`
`How Groupon bought its way to patent prominence
`ONLINE EXTRA: One of the knocks on Groupon has been that it lacks intellectual property to keep
`competitors at bay. Not anymore.
`
`See how Abbott Labs stacks up
`VIDEO: We take a closer look at a perennial patent powerhouse.
`Issue date:Apri/ 29, 2013
`
`From this week's Focus
`
`145
`
`as
`
`19
`
`39
`
`8+1
`
`5
`
`Whatdo you think?
`
`NOTE: Crain's Chicago Business has changed commenting platforms. Readers maycontinue to post
`comments iflogged in using their e>dsting ChicagoBusiness.com credentials. But now, readers mayalso log
`Pa e 4 of 5
`http://vwwv.chicagc§zusiness.corn/article/201 30427/ISSU E02/304279995/crains-eurele-index-ranls-chicagos-rnost-innovative-firms
`
`4/5
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`9/2/2014
`
`Crain's Eureka Index ranks Chicago's most innoxative firms - Focus - Crain's Chicago Business
`in using their social media credentials and electto share their ChicagoBusiness.com comments with friends
`on their designated social media pages.
`
`The commenter section of Crain's Chicago Business is an opportunity for our readers to start a dialog on our
`content. While we don't require you to use your real name, we do ask that you participate as though you were —
`that is, keep the conversation civil, stay on topic, avoid profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks, and please don't
`post commercial or self-promotional material. We will remove comments that violate these standards.
`
`0 Comments
`
`Sort "my Br: rat
`
`. ;‘r‘.|.;:'r|_ |."“r:
`
`:‘.7s;:';'..Is;s;‘:3i'i
`
`.
`
`S|1arr_~. B
`
`Be the first to comment.
`
`A.
`
`.
`
`............-.....-.........................
`
`Save lives — build an airport
`'.
`-. .ill'
`:1.
`11-
`2.-
`:.
`
`
`' — wait what? Chicago will
`ll-.~. -._:_=:;.
`L-‘.
`not stand for other towns and county's
`getting revenue? what a
`
`Old Town to get spinning gym
`._
`__ M.
`IL 1.,
`,__
`..
`
`at z. — In bankruptcy, I've always
`found the margin in estimated assets and
`liabilities very interesting.
`
`WHATS THI S’?
`
`Gov. Quinn loses ‘reformer’ cred with
`
`patronage hiring scandal
`.2‘ .'-.."l||l
`..i'.'-'. -
`'-
`
`: 1.:-.|;«. — Like Blago, Quinn grants
`'-.i
`money the State doesn't have to worthy
`projects. is that a good thing? Admit
`
`Hey, seat-back recliner, stay outta my
`space
`
`
`
`-. — The commenter's viewpoint
`.-.
`:-_«‘.i-
`|- '-l --
`is really warped! If you are long of leg,
`you should pay a few
`
`Useful Links
`
`Reviews
`
`Autow eek
`
`Chicago Restaurant Review s
`
`Partners
`
`Crain Publications
`
`Business Tools
`
`Services
`
`Traffic
`
`Weather
`Big Dates
`Bankruptcies
`
`Classified
`2014 Book of Lists
`
`About Us
`Events
`Crain's Events
`
`Terrrs of Site Use
`Cardiac Care
`
`Advertise with Us
`Contact Us
`
`Subscription Center
`Add Your Event
`Crain's in Social Media
`
`Giving Guide
`Wealth lvbnagement
`
`Also in Crain's
`
`Daily Business News
`This Week's Crain's
`Lists
`
`People
`
`Industry New 5
`Snell Business
`
`Society
`Real Estate
`
`Privacy Policy | About Us| Contact Us| Backto Top
`Copyright©2014 Crain Communications, Inc.
`
`Pa%e 5 of 5
`http://vvvvw.chi cag o
`usiness.com/arti cl e/201 30427/ISSU E02/304279995/crains-eureka-index-rants-chicag os-most-innovative-firms
`
`5/5
`
`Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket