throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. ______
`Filed: June 5, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION, TD AMERITRADE, INC., and
`TD AMERITRADE ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00133
`Patent 7,676,411
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections to
`
`Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case No. CBM2014-00133
`U.S. Patent No. 7,676,411
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner objects to Exhibit 1027,
`
`
`
`served with Petitioner’s Reply (Paper No. 42). Patent Owner objects to Exhibit
`
`1027 (Supplemental Declaration of Kendyl A. Román in Support of Petitioners’
`
`Reply for Covered Business Method Review of U.S. Patent 7,676,411) because
`
`portions of the Exhibit lack relevance (FRE 402), as they exceed the proper scope
`
`of Petitioner’s Reply. 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b) states “[a] reply may only respond to
`
`arguments raised in the corresponding . . . patent owner response.” As explained in
`
`the Trial Practice Guide, “new evidence necessary to make out a prima facie case
`
`for [] unpatentability” and “new evidence that could have been presented in a prior
`
`filing” are improper. 77 Fed. Reg. 48767. Patent Owner further objects to Exhibit
`
`1027 because of the prejudice resulting from Patent Owner’s inability to respond to
`
`the untimely evidence and arguments therein (FRE 403). For example, at least
`
`paragraphs 3-11 of Exhibit 1027 exceed the proper scope of Petitioner’s Reply and
`
`are thus irrelevant, untimely, prejudicial, and objectionable under FRE 402 and
`
`FRE 403.
`
`Dated: June 5, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joshua L. Goldberg/
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 59,369
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`

`

`Case No. CBM2014-00133
`U.S. Patent No. 7,676,411
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Owner’s Objections to Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64 was served on
`
`June 5, 2015, via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the
`
`following:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Jonathan M. Strang
`jstrang-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bradley J. Moore/
`Bradley J. Moore
`Litigation Clerk
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket