`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION,
`TD AMERITRADE, INC., and
`TD AMERITRADE ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP.
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2014-00131
`
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Board has already scheduled oral hearings for this CBM proceeding
`
`Case No. CBM2014-00131
`Patent No. 7,533,056
`
`
`
`(CBM2014-00131) and the three other pending CBM proceedings between
`
`Petitioners and Patent Owner (CBM2014-00133, CBM2014-00135, and
`
`CBM2014-00137) for July 9, 2015. Paper 20 at 6. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.70(a), Patent Owner requests oral hearing on the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability in each of the proceedings as well as all motions to exclude filed in
`
`the proceedings. Given the overlapping issues in the proceedings, Patent Owner
`
`proposes scheduling argument of the issues as follows:
`
`• 9:00am – Whether U.S. Patent Nos. 6,772,132 and 7,676,411 qualify
`
`for CBM review, whether claims 1-56 of the ’132 patent are
`
`patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101, and whether claims 1-28 of the
`
`’411 are patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (each side gets 90 minutes)
`
`• 12pm – 60 minute lunch break
`
`• 1:00pm – Any motions to exclude filed by Petitioners (each side gets
`
`10 minutes)
`
`• 1:30pm – Any motions to exclude filed by Patent Owner (each side
`
`gets 10 minutes)
`
`• 2pm – Whether U.S. Patent No. 7,685,055 qualifies for CBM review,
`
`whether claims 1-19 of the ’055 patent are patentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 101, whether claims 1, 3, 4, 6-15, and 17-19 of the ’055 patent are
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. CBM2014-00131
`Patent No. 7,533,056
`
`patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over TSE, and whether claims 2 and
`
`5 of the ’055 patent are patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over TSE
`
`and Gutterman (each side gets 60 minutes)
`
`• 4:15pm – Whether U.S. Patent No. 7,533,056 qualifies for CBM
`
`review, whether claims 1-15 of the ’056 patent are patentable under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 101, and whether claims 1-15 of the ’056 patent are
`
`patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over TSE, Togher, and Schott (each
`
`side gets 60 minutes)
`
`Patent Owner requests that, in addition to lead and back-up counsel, eight
`
`spaces be reserved at the oral hearings to accommodate its counsel and corporate
`
`representatives.
`
`Dated: June 12, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Joshua L. Goldberg/
` Joshua L. Goldberg, Reg. No. 59,369
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING was served on June 12, 2015,
`
`via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioners at the following:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Jonathan M. Strang
`jstrang-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Lisa C. Hines/
`Lisa C. Hines
`Litigation Clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP