`Paper No. 10
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`and
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC.
`Real Party-In-Interest
`
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00117
`Patent 7,908,304
`____________
`
`
`CALLIDUS’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`Description
`
`Callidus’s
`Exhibit No.
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,908,304
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,908,304 File History
`
`Complaint, Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software Inc.
`Litigation, Case No. 1:12-cv-00931-SLR (D. Del. July 19,
`2012), D.N. 1
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`
`
`Decision to Institute in SAP v. Versata, CBM2012-00001,
`Paper No. 36 (PTAB Jan. 9, 2013)
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office – Classification
`Definitions, Class 705
`
`Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents—
`Definitions of Covered Business Method Patent and
`Technological Invention, 77 Fed. Reg. 48734 (Aug. 14, 2012)
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in SAP v. Versata,
`CBM2012-00001, Paper No. 29 (PTAB Nov. 30, 2012)
`
`Official Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug.
`14, 2012)
`
`Final Written Decision in SAP v. Versata, CBM2012-00001,
`Paper No. 70 (PTAB June 11, 2013)
`
`Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Post-
`Grant Review Proceedings, and Transitional Program for
`Covered Business Method Patents, 77 Fed. Reg. 48680 (Aug.
`14, 2012)
`
`Declaration of Joseph E. DeHaven in Support of Petition for
`Covered Business Method Patent Review of U.S. Patent No.
`7,908,304
`
`Declaration of Janis McGuffey in Support of Petition for
`Covered Business Method Patent Review of U.S. Patent No.
`7,908,304
`
`Decision to Institute in Callidus v. Versata, CBM2013-00054,
`Paper No. 19 (PTAB March 4, 2014)
`
`Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review in
`Callidus v. Versata, CBM2013-00054, Paper No. 6 (PTAB
`Sept. 17, 2013)
`
`Decision on Request for Rehearing in Callidus v. Versata,
`CBM2013-00054, Paper No. 25 (PTAB Apr. 9, 2014)
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`
`
`
`
`Complaint, Callidus Software Inc. v. Versata Software, Inc.
`Litigation, Case No. 4:12-cv-5337 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2012),
`D.N. 1
`
`Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, Callidus
`Software Inc. v. Versata Software, Inc. Litigation, Case No.
`4:12-cv-5337 (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2013), D.N. 17
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,958,024
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,904,326
`
`Decision to Institute in Callidus v. Versata, CBM2013-00053,
`Paper No. 16 (PTAB March 4, 2014)
`
`Decision to Institute in Callidus v. Versata, CBM2013-00052,
`Paper No. 21 (PTAB March 4, 2014)
`
`Declaration of Assad H. Rajani in support of Motion for Assad
`H. Rajani to appear Pro Hac Vice
`
`Declaration of Michael S. Tonkinson in support of Motion for
`Michael S. Tonkinson to appear Pro Hac Vice
`
`3
`
`
`
`May 16, 2014
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
` /
`
` Deborah E. Fishman /
`Deborah E. Fishman (Reg. No. 48,621)
`Michael S. Tonkinson (pro hac vice pending)
`Assad H. Rajani (pro hac vice pending)
`
`DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
`1841 Page Mill Road, Suite 150
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Phone: (650) 690-9500
`Fax: (650) 690-9501
`Email: fishmand@dicksteinshapiro.com
` tonkinsonm@dicksteinshapiro.com
` rajania@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing CALLIDUS’S EXHIBIT
`
`LIST was served on May 16, 2014, by the methods set forth below at the
`
`following addresses of record for the subject patent:
`
`
`
`
`Terrile, Cannatti, Chambers
` & Holland, LLP
`(P.O. Box 203518)
`8911 North Capital of Texas Hwy.
`Suite 3150
`Austin, TX 78759
`kchambers@tcchlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Via Email (kchambers@tcchlaw.com)
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Deborah E. Fishman /
`Deborah E. Fishman
`Reg. No. 48,621
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`