throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 48 (CBM2014-00102)
` Paper 48 (CBM2014-00106)
` Paper 46 (CBM2014-00108)
`Paper 44 (CBM2014-00112)
`Entered: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SMARTFLASH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Cases1
`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)2
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are the same in all four cases. We exercise
`our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`2 Case CBM2014-00103 has been consolidated with CBM2014-00102; case
`CBM2014-00107 has been consolidated with CBM2014-00106; case
`CBM2014-00109 has been consolidated with CBM2014-00108; case
`CBM2014-00113 has been consolidated with CBM2014-00112.
`
`

`

`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`Before JENNIFER S. BISK, RAMA G. ELLURU,
`JEREMY M. PLENZLER, and MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have each requested an oral hearing for
`
`inter partes review proceeding CBM2014-00102, CBM2014-00106,
`
`CBM2014-00108, and CBM2014-00112 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`
`Papers 40 and 443. Upon consideration by the panel, the parties’ requests
`
`are granted. Specifically, the hearing will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern
`
`Standard Time, on June 9, 2015, on the ninth floor of Madison Building
`
`East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`
`Each party will have two hours of total time4 to present arguments on
`
`all four cases. The parties are free to divide the time among the four cases as
`
`they choose, and must make clear at all times for purposes of the transcript,
`
`the case(s) which they are discussing. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden
`
`of proof that Patent Owner’s claims at issue in this review are unpatentable
`
`and has the burden on its motion to exclude evidence. Petitioner will,
`
`therefore, begin by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims and
`
`
`3 Papers numbers refer to papers in CBM2014-00102.
`4 Patent Owner requested two hours per side for all four related cases. Paper
`44. Petitioner’s request did not specify an amount of time for argument.
`
`2
`
`

`

`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`grounds for which the Board instituted trial in the proceeding. Patent Owner
`
`will then respond to Petitioner’s arguments. Petitioner may reserve time to
`
`reply to arguments presented by Patent Owner. There is no motion to amend
`
`pending in any of the subject proceedings.
`
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that
`
`will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Board will
`
`provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will
`
`constitute the official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served
`
`five (5) business days before the hearing. The parties are directed to St. Jude
`
`Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University
`
`of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65),
`
`regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The Board
`
`expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith to resolve any
`
`objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections cannot be
`
`resolved the parties may file any objections to demonstratives with the
`
`Board at least two business days before the hearing. The objections should
`
`identify with particularity which portions of the demonstrative exhibits are
`
`subject to objection, include a copy of the objected-to portions, and include a
`
`one-sentence statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or
`
`further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider any objections and
`
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits
`
`that is not timely presented will be considered waived.
`
`3
`
`

`

`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`
`The parties also shall provide the demonstrative exhibits to the Board
`
`at least two business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`
`this case without prior authorization from the Board. A hard copy of the
`
`demonstratives should be provided to the court reporter at the hearing.
`
`The parties also should note that at least one member of the panel will
`
`be attending the hearing electronically from a remote location, and that if a
`
`demonstrative is not made fully available or visible to the judge participating
`
`in the hearing remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered. If the
`
`parties have questions as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be
`
`sufficiently visible and available to all of the judges, the parties are invited
`
`to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797. The parties are also reminded that
`
`the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative
`
`exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to
`
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and the ability of
`
`the judge participating in the hearing remotely to closely follow the
`
`presenter’s arguments.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, lead or backup counsel may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`
`directed to the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`
`4
`
`

`

`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`equipment are to be made five (5) days in advance of the hearing date. The
`
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received
`
`timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`5
`
`

`

`CBM2014-00102 (Patent 8,118,221 B2)
`CBM2014-00106 (Patent 8,033,458 B2)
`CBM2014-00108 (Patent 8,061,598 B2)
`CBM2014-00112 (Patent 7,942,317 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Ching-Lee Fukuda
`Megan Raymond
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`ching-lee.fukuda@ropesgray.com
`megan.raymond@ropesgray.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael R. Casey
`J. Scott Davidson
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY LLP
`mcasey@dbjg.com
`jsd@dbjg.com
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket