throbber
Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`Master Docket
`)
`Misc. No. 12-244
`)
`MDL No. 2354
`)
`)
`)
`
`CONTI, Chief District Judge
`
`_____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`IN RE: MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS,
`INC., MDL NO. 2354
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This Document Relates to: 12-cv-89
`
`_____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,
`INC., and PNC BANK, NATIONAL
`
`ASSOCIATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`
`Plaintiff and Counter-Defendants,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.,
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff.
`
`_________________________________________ )
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 2:12-cv-89-JFC
`
`
`THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND
`PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS
`INC.’S JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME
`
`The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association
`
`
`
`(collectively “PNC”) and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (“Maxim”) respectfully move this
`
`Court for a two-week extension of time for PNC to file Non-Infringement Contentions and for a
`
`bilateral extension of the discovery period of two weeks. In support hereof, the parties state as
`
`follows:
`
`1.
`
`PNC and Maxim have agreed, in principle, to settle their respective claims
`
`pending in this Action. The parties are currently diligently working to execute a settlement
`
`agreement, which they expect to complete in the near future.
`
`1
`
`PNC-JP MORGAN EXHIBIT 1017
`PNC Bank - JP Morgan v. Maxim
`CBM2014-00039
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114 Filed 04/04/14 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`2.
`
`PNC and Maxim have already agreed to bilateral extensions of time to respond to
`
`currently pending discovery between the parties and have also agreed not to object on the basis
`
`of timeliness in the event of subsequent service of responses.
`
`3.
`
`In view of the parties’ anticipated settlement and to afford the parties time to
`
`complete settlement before the passing of any case deadlines, the parties respectfully request that
`
`the date for PNC to serve Non-Infringement Contentions, which are currently due on April 16,
`
`2014, per D.I. 749, be extended until April 30, 2014. This represents a 2-week extension of time.
`
`4.
`
`As discussed at the April 2, 2014 Hearing before Your Honor, the parties also
`
`respectfully request a bilateral extension of the fact discovery period (to apply to discovery
`
`between PNC and Maxim only), which is currently set to close on May 16, 2014, per D.I. 749,
`
`until May 30, 2014. This represents a 2-week extension of time.
`
`5.
`
`WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for PNC to serve
`
`Non-Infringement Contentions be set for April 30, 2014, and the end of fact discovery be set for
`
`May 30, 2014.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`Date: April 4, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue, Esq.
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`James J. Boyle, Esq.
`james.boyle@finnegan.com
`Michael V. Young, Sr., Esq.
`michael.young@finnegan.com
`Elizabeth A. Laughton, Esq.
`elizabeth.laughton@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114 Filed 04/04/14 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`Reston, VA 20190-5675
`Telephone: (571) 203-2700
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants
`The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and
`PNC Bank, National Association
`
`/s/ William P. Nelson
`Matthew D. Powers (pro hac vice)
`Steven S. Cherensky (pro hac vice)
`Paul T. Ehrlich (pro hac vice)
`William P. Nelson (pro hac vice)
`Aaron M. Nathan (pro hac vice)
`Stefani C. Smith (pro hac vice)
`Sam Y. Kim (pro hac vice)
`Robert L. Gerrity (pro hac vice)
`Palani P. Rathinasamy (pro hac vice)
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 802-6000
`Fax: (650) 802-6001
`Email:
`matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
`steven.cherensky@tensegritylawgroup.com
`paul.ehrlich@tensegritylawgroup.com
`william.nelson@tensegritylawgroup.com
`aaron.nathan@tensegritylawgroup.com
`stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`sam.kim@tensegritylawgroup.com
`robert.gerrity@tensegritylawgroup.com
`palani@tensegritylawgroup.com
`Leland P. Schermer, Esquire
`Pa. ID No. 47283
`Bryan A. Loose, Esquire
`Pa. ID No. 201385
`LELAND SCHERMER & ASSOCIATES, PC
`Henry W. Oliver Building
`535 Smithfield Street, Third Floor
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`Phone: (412) 642-5000
`Fax: (412) 642-5010
`Email:
`lschermer@schermerlaw.com
`bloose@schermerlaw.com
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114 Filed 04/04/14 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`James C. Otteson (pro hac vice)
`Phillip W. Marsh (pro hac vice)
`Michael D.K. Nguyen (pro hac vice)
`
`AGILITY IP LAW LLP
`149 Commonwealth Drive
`Menlo Park, CA 94065
`Phone: (650) 227-4800
`Email:
`jim@agilityiplaw.com
`phil@agilityiplaw.com
`mnguyen@agilityiplaw.com
`Michael North (pro hac vice)
`NORTH WEBER & BAUGH LLP
`2479 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 707
`Palo Alto, CA 94303
`Email: mnorth@northweber.com
`
`Attorneys for Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114 Filed 04/04/14 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lionel M. Lavenue, Esquire, hereby certify that on April 4, 2014, I caused the
`
`
`
`
`foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which
`
`will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`Case 2:12-cv-00089-JFC Document 114-1 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 1
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`_____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`IN RE: MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS,
`INC., MDL NO. 2354
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This Document Relates to: 12-cv-89
`
`_____________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP,
`INC., and PNC BANK, NATIONAL
`
`ASSOCIATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`
`Plaintiff and Counter-Defendants,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.,
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff.
`
`_________________________________________ )
`
`
`
`Master Docket
`)
`Misc. No. 12-244
`)
`MDL No. 2354
`)
`)
`)
`
`CONTI, Chief District Judge
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 2:12-cv-89-JFC
`
`
`ORDER OF COURT
`
`AND NOW, this ____ day of April, 2014 upon consideration of The PNC Financial
`
`
`
`Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association and Maxim Integrated Products,
`
`Inc.,’s Joint Motion for Extensions of Time, it is hereby ORDERED that PNC shall serve Non-
`
`Infringement Contentions by April 30, 2014 and that fact discovery for PNC and Maxim shall
`
`close on May 30, 2014.
`
`GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`_____________________________________
`The Honorable Joy Flowers Conti
`United States Chief District Court Judge
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket