throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: March 28, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`PNC BANK, N.A. and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
`and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Cases CBM2014-00038 (Patent 5,940,510)
`CBM2014-00039 (Patent 5,949,880)
`CBM2014-00040 (Patent 6,105,013)
`CBM2014-00041 (Patent 6,237,095) 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and
`MIRIAM L. QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This order addresses a similar issue in the four cases. Therefore, we
`exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this style of heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`Cases CBM2014-00038, -00039, -00040, and -00041
`
`
`On March 27, 2014, a conference call was held including counsel for
`
`the respective parties and Judges Medley, Weatherly, and Quinn. The
`
`purpose of the call was for Petitioner to seek authorization to withdraw PNC
`
`Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) from the proceeding.
`
`
`
`PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) and JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JP
`
`Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan”) are the real parties-in-interest for
`
`Petitioner. See, e.g., CBM2014-00038, Paper 3 at 2. Counsel for Petitioner
`
`explained that PNC, but not JP Morgan, seeks to withdraw from the
`
`proceedings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4). As such, Petitioner
`
`requests authorization to file a motion requesting adverse judgment against
`
`PNC. Counsel for Patent Owner did not oppose the filing of such motion,
`
`but did indicate that Patent Owner would oppose the motion.
`
`
`
`Based on the record before us, Petitioner is authorized to file a motion
`
`requesting adverse judgment against PNC pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.73(b)(4). Patent Owner will have an opportunity to oppose.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file a motion, in each of
`
`the four proceedings, requesting adverse judgment against PNC pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4);
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is limited to five pages and is
`
`due April 1, 2014;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file, in
`
`each of the four proceedings, a five page opposition to the motion due April
`
`4, 2014; and
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file, in each of
`
`the four proceedings, a two page reply due April 7, 2014.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Cases CBM2014-00038, -00039, -00040, and -00041
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Lionel Lavenue
`Lionel.lavenue@finnegnan.com
`
`Timothy May
`Timothy.may@finnegan.com
`
`Joshua Goldberg
`Joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`weatherwax@glwllp.com
`
`Parham Hendifar
`hendifar@glwllp.com
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket