`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EBAY ENTERPRISE, INC. AND EBAY, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LAWRENCE B. LOCKWOOD
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case CBM2014-00026
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`____________________
`
`
`UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00026 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`
`LOCKWOOD EXHIBIT LIST
`
`COVERED BUSINESS METHODS REVIEW OF THE ’951 PATENT
`
`Exhibit
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`DESCRIPTION
`Declaration of Steve Smoot under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 submitted as
`part of In re Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`to Lockwood (Control No. 90/012,671) on May 15, 2013 (“Smoot
`’508 Declaration”)
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. §1.131(b)
`submitted as part of Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No. 90/006,625) on June 22, 2004
`(“Lockwood ’951 Declaration”)
`Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301 (issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951)
`Feb. 10, 1995, Response to the Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office
`Action regarding U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`Affidavit Evidence submitted in support of the Feb. 10, 1995,
`Response to the Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office Action regarding
`U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`Sept. 26, 1995, Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`April 1, 1996, Restriction Requirement regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`April 30, 1996, Response to the April 1, 1996 Restriction
`Requirement regarding U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`July 19, 1996, Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`“The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions,” Wilfred
`Schoenmakers and Geert Duysters
`“Improving Citation-Based Patent Value Measures,” Dirk
`Czarnitzki, Katrin Hussinger, and Bart Leten
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. §1.131
`submitted as part of Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`7,010,508 to Lockwood (Control No. 90/012,671) on May 17, 2013
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00026 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`
`Exhibit
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`DESCRIPTION
`(“Lockwood ’508 Declaration”)
`April 23, 2013, Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Partes Reexamination
`Certificate for U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No.
`90/012,685)
`May 26, 2005, Non-Final Office Action regarding Ex Parte
`Reexamination of U.S. Patent 5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No.
`90/006,625)
`http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pioneer, (Last visited
`2/17/2014.)
`September 15, 2012 Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S.
`Patent No. 5,576,951
`Search results from USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database
`regarding patents that cite U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`Declaration of Jason Eisenberg
`April 10, 2014, Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Landmark
`Technology, LLC v. iRobot Corporation, (E.D.Tex. May 22, 2013)
`(NO. 6:13CV00411)
`Transcript of Teleconference with Board, GSI Commerce Solutions,
`Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case CBM2014-00025; eBay, Inc.
`and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case
`CBM2014-00026, dated April 25, 2014
`Transcript of Teleconference with Board, Ebay Enterprises, Inc.,
`and Ebay, Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case CBM2014-00025 &
`CBM2014-00026, dated July 21, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 1, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg (Reg. No. 43,447)
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
