throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EBAY INC. AND GSI COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`LANDMARK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case CBM2014-00026
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`____________________
`
`
`LANDMARK’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00026 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`
`EBAY AND GSI’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`COVERED BUSINESS METHODS REVIEW OF THE ’951 PATENT
`
`Exhibit
`1001
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`1009
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`DESCRIPTION
`U.S. Patent No. 4,359,631 to Lockwood (“Lockwood ’631”)
`“A Model of an Audit Judgment in the Form of an Expert
`System,” Dungan, Chris W., Ph. D. dissertation (“Dungan”)
`“Oncocin: An Expert System for Oncology Protocol
`Management,” Edward H. Shortliffe, et al. (“Shortliffe”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,241,671 to Reed, et al. (“Reed”)
`“Expert System for Diesel Electric Locomotive Repair,”
`Harold E. Johnson, et al., Journal of Forth Application and
`Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-16 (“Johnson”)
`“An Interactive Video Information Terminal,”
`Ronald D. Gordon, Globecom ’82, IEEE Global
`Telecommunications Conference, Conference Record vol. 3 of
`3 (“Gordon”)
`“The EMYCIN Manual,” William van Melle, et al.
`(“EMYCIN”)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 to Lockwood (“the ’951 Patent”)
`Declaration of Dr. Sandra Newton, Ph.D.
`Complaint Landmark Tech., LLC v. iRobot Corp., Civil Action
`No. 6:13-cv-411 United States District Court for the Eastern
`District of Texas, dated May 22, 2013 (“iRobot Complaint”)
`Complaint Landmark Tech., LLC v. Burberry Ltd., Civil Action
`No. 6:12-cv-932 United States District Court for the Eastern
`District of Texas, dated December 11, 2012 (“Burberry
`Complaint”)
`Complaint Landmark Tech., LLC v. Airgas, Inc., Civil Action
`No. 6:13-cv-930 United States District Court for the Eastern
`District of Texas, dated December 11, 2012 (“Airgas
`Complaint”)
`May 3, 2013, Informational Letter to eBay from Landmark
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00026 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`
`LANDMARK EXHIBIT LIST
`
`COVERED BUSINESS METHODS REVIEW OF THE ’951 PATENT
`
`Exhibit
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`DESCRIPTION
`Declaration of Steve Smoot under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 submitted as
`part of In re Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`to Lockwood (Control No. 90/012,671) on May 15, 2013 (“Smoot
`’508 Declaration”)
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. §1.131(b)
`submitted as part of Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No. 90/006,625) on June 22, 2004
`(“Lockwood ’951 Declaration”)
`Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301 (issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951)
`Feb. 10, 1995, Response to the Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office
`Action regarding U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`Affidavit Evidence submitted in support of the Feb. 10, 1995,
`Response to the Nov. 28, 1994, Non-Final Office Action regarding
`U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`Sept. 26, 1995, Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`April 1, 1996, Restriction Requirement regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`April 30, 1996, Response to the April 1, 1996 Restriction
`Requirement regarding U.S. Patent Application No. 08/210,301
`July 19, 1996, Notice of Allowance regarding U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/210,301
`“The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions,” Wilfred
`Schoenmakers and Geert Duysters
`“Improving Citation-Based Patent Value Measures,” Dirk
`Czarnitzki, Katrin Hussinger, and Bart Leten
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. §1.131
`submitted as part of Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No.
`7,010,508 to Lockwood (Control No. 90/012,671) on May 17, 2013
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00026 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`
`DESCRIPTION
`(“Lockwood ’508 Declaration”)
`April 23, 2013, Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Partes Reexamination
`Certificate for U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No.
`90/012,685)
`May 26, 2005, Non-Final Office Action regarding Ex Parte
`Reexamination of U.S. Patent 5,576,951 to Lockwood (Control No.
`90/006,625)
`http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pioneer, (Last visited
`2/17/2014.)
`September 15, 2012 Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S.
`Patent No. 5,576,951
`Search results from USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database
`regarding patents that cite U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`Declaration of Jason Eisenberg
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg (Reg. No. 43,447)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 18, 2014

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket