`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EBAY ENTERPRISE, INC. and EBAY INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LAWRENCE B. LOCKWOOD
`Patent Owner
`__________________
`
`Case CBM2014-00025
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`____________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, and to the Board’s order
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`
`
`
`of October 3, 2014, 2014 (Paper 40), authorizing this motion, Petitioners eBay
`
`Enterprise, Inc. and eBay Inc. (“eBay”) and Patent Owner Lawrence B. Lockwood
`
`(“Lockwood”) jointly request the termination of this covered business method
`
`review CBM2014-00025 of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508.
`
`The parties have settled their dispute and executed a settlement agreement
`
`(Ex. 2030). The Agreement includes provisions to terminate this CBM and the
`
`parties’ co-pending covered business method review proceeding CBM2014-00026
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951.
`
`As required under 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the parties’
`
`settlement agreement has been made in writing, and a true and correct copy is
`
`being filed concurrently as Exhibit 2030. And pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), the
`
`parties are also filing concurrently herewith a joint request to treat the settlement
`
`agreement as business confidential information and keep it separate from the files
`
`of this CBM and the involved patent.
`
`Termination of this CBM is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a) because the
`
`Board has not yet decided the merits of the proceeding. Indeed, the briefing and
`
`discovery process in this proceeding has not yet been completed. Lockwood has
`
`filed a Patent Owner’s Response to the Petition, but Lockwood’s declarants have
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`not been deposed, and eBay has not filed a Reply or any evidence in Reply.
`
`Lockwood did not file a Motion to Amend and thus no such motion is pending.
`
`There are no motions or other matters outstanding in this CBM.
`
`Landmark submits that maintaining this CBM after settlement would
`
`discourage future settlements by removing a primary motivation for settlement:
`
`eliminating litigation risk by resolving the parties’ disputes and ending the pending
`
`proceedings between them. For patent owners, litigation risks include the potential
`
`for their patents to be invalidated. If a patent owner knows that a covered business
`
`method or inter partes review is likely to continue regardless of settlement, it can
`
`create a strong disincentive for the patent owner to settle.
`
`There is no litigation pending between Lockwood and eBay relating to the
`
`patent that is the subject of this CBM.
`
`There is pending litigation relating to the ’508 patent and U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,576,951 (the subject of the co-pending CBM 2014-00026) between Lockwood
`
`and other parties in the following actions:
`
`1. Landmark Technology LLC v. Tempur-Pedic Int’l Inc., (E.D.Tex. May
`
`22, 2013) (NO. 6:13CV00416);
`
`2. Landmark Technology LLC v. The ADT Corporation, (E.D.Tex. Oct.
`
`10, 2013) (NO. 6:13CV00758);
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`3. Landmark Technology LLC v. The Jones Group, (E.D.Tex. Oct. 10,
`
`2013) (NO. 6:13CV00767);
`
`4. Landmark Technology LLC v. Hugo Boss USA, Inc., (E.D.Tex. Oct.
`
`10, 2013) (NO. 6:13CV00766);
`
`5. Landmark Technology LLC v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation,
`
`(E.D.Tex. Oct. 10, 2013) (NO. 6:13CV00760); and
`
`6. Landmark Technology LLC v. Union Pacific, (E.D.Tex. Jan. 15, 2014)
`
`(NO. 6:14CV00026); and
`
`7. Landmark Technology LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc., (E.D.Tex. May 22,
`
`2013) (NO. 6:13CV00414).
`
`All of these litigations are stayed pending the outcome of this CBM and
`
`CBM2014-00026.
`
`
`
`The following active cases are waiting on a scheduling order/conference.
`
`These cases involve only related U.S. Patent No. 6,289,319 patent (see Patent
`
`Owner’s Updated Mandatory Notices of Nov. 27, 2013, Paper 10, (showing
`
`Lockwood’s patent family tree and the relationship of the ’508 and ’319 patents)):
`
`1. Landmark Technology LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., (E.D.Tex.
`
`Apr. 4, 2014) (NO. 6:14CV00243);
`
`2. Landmark Technology LLC v. Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., (E.D.Tex.
`
`Apr. 4, 2014) (NO. 6:14CV00247);
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`3. Landmark Technology LLC v. Boyd Gaming Corp., (E.D.Tex. Apr. 4,
`
`2014) (NO. 6:14CV00244);
`
`4. Landmark Technology LLC v. Hitachi America Ltd., (E.D.Tex. Apr. 4,
`
`2014) (NO. 6:14CV00249); and
`
`5. Landmark Technology LLC v. Harley-Davidson, (E.D.Tex. Apr. 4,
`
`2014) (NO. 6:14CV00248).
`
`
`
`An ex parte reexamination of the ’508 patent (Control No. 90/012,671;
`
`Appeal No. 2015-000143) is at the Board for oral hearing and is the only other
`
`proceeding pending before the Patent and Trademark Office relating to the patent
`
`at issue in this CBM. Lockwood filed a Reply Brief on September 11, 2014. Oral
`
`argument was requested, but no date has been set.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`Accordingly, eBay and Lockwood respectfully request that this this CBM
`
`proceeding be terminated in its entirety. In any event, eBay respectfully requests
`
`that its involvement in this CBM be terminated. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`is hereby authorized to charge any fee deficiency, or credit any overpayment, to
`
`Deposit Account No. 19-0036.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 9, 2014
`
`
`/Don Daybell________ /
`Don Daybell, Reg. No. 50,877
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`(949) 567-6700
`Counsel for Petitioners
`eBay Enterprise, Inc. and eBay Inc.
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Donald J. Featherstone/
`Donald J. Featherstone, Reg. No. 33,876
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`P.L.L.C.
`1100 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW
`WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Lawrence B. Lockwood
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO
`
`TERMINATE was served electronically via e-mail on October 9, 2014, in its
`
`entirety on the following:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Don Daybell, Reg. No. 50,877
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Main: (949) 567-6700
`Direct: (949) 852-7735
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`Email: ddaybell@orrick.com
`
`Back-up Counsel
`James Maune, Reg. No. 67,187
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Main: (949) 567-6700
`Direct: (949) 852-7721
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`Email: jmaune@orrick.com
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Donald J. Featherstone/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Donald J. Featherstone, Reg. No. 28,912
`Counsel for Patent Owner – Lawrence B.
`Lockwood
`
`
`
`Date: October 9, 2014
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C.20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`1914787_2.DOCX
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`