`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EBAY ENTERPRISE, INC. and EBAY, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LAWRENCE B. LOCKWOOD
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case CBM2014-00025
`Patent 7,010,508
`____________________
`
`
`LOCKWOOD’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00025 of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`
`LOCKWOOD EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Description
`http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pioneer, (Last visited
`2/17/2014.)
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. § 1.131
`submitted in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`(Control No. 90/012,671) on May 17, 2013 (“Lockwood ’508
`Declaration”)
`“The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions,” Wilfred
`Schoenmakers and Geert Duysters
`“Improving Citation-Based Patent Value Measures,” Dirk
`Czarnitzki, Katrin Hussinger, and Bart Leten
`September 15, 2012, Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S.
`Patent No. 7,010,508 (Control No. 90/012,671)
`December 30, 2013, Appeal Brief in Ex Parte Reexamination of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 (Control No. 90/012,671)
`July 7, 1997, Response to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Patent
`Application No. 08/418,772
`Declaration of Lawrence B. Lockwood under 37 C.F.R. §1.131(b)
`submitted in Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 5,576,951
`(Control No. 90/006,625) on June 22, 2004 (“Lockwood ’951
`Declaration”)
`May 26, 2005, Non-Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination
`of U.S. Patent 5,576,951 (Control No. 90/006,625)
`Declaration of Steve Smoot under 37 C.F.R. §1.132 submitted in Ex
`Parte Reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 (Control No.
`90/012,671) on May 15, 2013 (“Smoot ’508 Declaration”)
`August 30, 2005, Decision on Appeal in U.S. Patent Application
`No. 08/418,772
`May 17, 2013, Patent Owner’s Reply in Ex Parte Reexamination for
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508 (Control No. 90/012,671)
`February 20, 2013, Non-Final Office Action in Ex Parte
`Reexamination of U.S. Patent 7,010,508 to Lockwood (Control No.
`90/012,671)
`Declaration of Jason D. Eisenberg
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`2022
`2023
`
`2024
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00025 of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,508
`
`Description
`April 10, 2014, Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Landmark
`Technology, LLC v. iRobot Corporation, (E.D.Tex. May 22, 2013)
`(NO. 6:13CV00411)
`Transcript of Teleconference with Board, GSI Commerce Solutions,
`Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case CBM2014-00025; eBay, Inc.
`and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case
`CBM2014-00026, dated April 25, 2014
`Transcript of Teleconference with Board, Ebay Enterprises, Inc.,
`and Ebay, Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Case CBM2014-00025 &
`CBM2014-00026, dated July 21, 2014
`April 7, 1995, Specification filed in U.S. Patent Application No.
`08/418,772
`Definition of “interrelate,” Webster’s New World Dictionary,
`Second College Edition
`“Plane Geometry Theorem Proving Using Forward Chaining,”
`Arthur J. Nevins, Massachusetts Institute of Technology A.I.
`Laboratory, January 1974 Memo No. 303
`Definition of “forward chaining,” The Computer Glossary, Fifth
`Edition
`Declaration of Earl Sacerdoti, Ph.D. with Curriculum Vitae
`Transcript of Teleconference with Board, eBay Enterprises, Inc. and
`eBay Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood, Cases CBM2014-00025 and
`CBM2014-00026, dated August 19, 2014
`Declaration of Jason D. Eisenberg
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg (Reg. No. 43,447)
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 29, 2014