`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 19
`
` Entered: April 25, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EBAY ENTERPRISE, INC. and EBAY, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`LAWRENCE B. LOCKWOOD1
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Cases CBM2014-00025 (Patent 7,010,508)
`CBM2014-00026 (Patent 5,576,951)2
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY and BENJAMIN D. M. WOOD,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`1 Both Petitioner and Patent Owner filed updated notices pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.8 updating real parties-in-interest information. See, e.g.,
`CBM2014-00025, Papers 14, 16 and CBM2014-00026, Papers 15, 17.
`Accordingly, the parties shall use the updated title shown here, reflective of
`the current real parties-in-interest, for any further filings in either
`proceeding.
`
` 2
`
` This order addresses similar issues raised in both cases. We exercise
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025 (Patent 7,010,508)
`CBM2014-00026 (Patent 5,576,951)
`
`
`
`
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`On April 25, 2014, a conference call was held between counsel for the
`
`respective parties and Judges Medley and Wood.
`
`The purpose of the conference call was for Petitioner to seek
`
`authorization to submit briefing, along with a declaration, describing the
`
`relationship between Petitioner and its customer iRobot who was sued for
`
`infringement of the involved patents. Patent Owner opposed the request.
`
`Based on the record before us, Petitioner is authorized to provide
`
`additional briefing to address (1) the facts behind the late request for further
`
`briefing, (2) the relationship between Petitioner and its customer iRobot, and
`
`(3) the dismissal with prejudice of the case styled Landmark Technology,
`
`LLC v. iRobot Corporation (E.D.Tex. May 22, 2013) (NO. 6-13-cv-00411).
`
`In addition, Petitioner may submit a declaration, limited to no more than 5
`
`pages, in support of issues 1 and 2. Patent Owner is authorized to file a
`
`response to Petitioner’s additional briefing. No other briefing is authorized.3
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file, no later than April 29,
`
`2014, a brief limited to 7 pages, along with a declaration limited to 5 pages,
`
`as set forth per this order; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner may file, no later than May
`
`
`3 During the conference call, counsel for Petitioner represented that
`Petitioner has standing for the additional reason that it (eBay Inc.) has been
`charged with infringement. This assertion was raised in CBM2014-00026
`(Paper 1 at 3), but not in CBM2014-00025. Petitioner is not authorized to
`submit additional briefing or evidence regarding this additional standing
`issue.
`
`
`
`CBM2014-00025 (Patent 7,010,508)
`CBM2014-00026 (Patent 5,576,951)
`
`2, 2014, a response limited to 7 pages, as set forth per this order.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Don Daybell
`James Maune
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`ddaybell@orrick.com
`jmaune@orrick.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert Sterne
`Donald Featherstone
`Jason Eisenberg
`Richard Bemben
`Byron Pickard
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC
`rsterne@skgf.com
`donf-PTAB@skgf.com
`jasone-PTAB@skgf.com
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`bpickard-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`