`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AGILYSYS, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`AMERANTH
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00016
`Patent 6,871,325
`____________
`
`Mailed: October 23, 2013
`
`Before Cathy Underwood, Trial Paralegal
`
`NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION
`AND
`TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
`
`The petition for covered business method patent review in the above
`proceeding has been accorded the filing date of October 15, 2013.
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00016
`Patent 6,871,325
`
`
`Administrative Patent Judge Jameson Lee has been designated to
`manage the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.5.
`A review of the petition identified the following defect(s):
` Failure to provide a statement identifying how the
`challenged claims are to be construed. 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.104(b)(3).
`
`
`Petitioner must correct the defect(s) within FIVE BUSINESS DAYS
`from this notice. Failure to correct the defect(s) may result in an order to
`show cause as to why the Board should institute the trial. No substantive
`changes (e.g., new grounds) may be made to the petition.
`Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later
`than three months from the date of this notice. The preliminary response is
`limited to setting forth the reasons why the requested review should not be
`instituted. Patent Owner may also file an election to waive the preliminary
`response to expedite the proceeding. For more information, please consult
`the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012),
`which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory
`notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of
`the petition.
`The parties are encouraged to use the heading on the first page of this
`Notice for all future filings in the proceeding.
`The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of
`counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause. The parties are
`authorized to file motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00016
`Patent 6,871,325
`
`§ 42.10(c). Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order --
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639,
`Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.”
`The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
`Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web
`site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
`If there are any questions pertaining to this notice, please contact
`Cathy Underwood at 571-272-8358 or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at
`571-272-7822.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00016
`Patent 6,871,325
`
`PETITIONER:
`Richard S. Zembek
`Gilbert A. Greene
`FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
`richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com
`bert.greene@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Locke Lorde, LLP
`Attn: IP Docketing
`Three World Financial Center
`New York NY 10281-2101
`and
`William J Caldarelli
`Mazzarella Caldarelli LLP
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`and
`Michael D Fabiano
`Fabiano Law Firm, P.C.
`12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`
`
`4
`
`